6👍
- HB77

Ahh sorry, so he’s worth it!

Oh good one!!
- Clyde334

😂🤛

Hurts your draft position tho.
Oh wait....😉
- HB77

We know how much you guys like the draft.

Ahh sorry, so he’s worth it!
- Clyde334

That one hook to tanners dome was worth at least 3 mil. The two to smith’s were good for a mil each. Almost got that deal paid off this season !

We know how much you guys like the draft.
- Clyde334

It’s our one skill

Hurts your draft position tho.
Oh wait....😉
- HB77

We draft better in the late rounds
Johnny 4th round
Brodie 4th round
Ferland 5th round
Kulak 4th round
See where I'm going with this?

It’s our one skill
- HB77

We draft better in the late rounds
Johnny 4th round
Brodie 4th round
Ferland 5th round
Kulak 4th round
See where I'm going with this?
- K-man25

Yup. That you’re a (frank)ing braggart.

We know how much you guys like the draft.
- Clyde334

I prefer it over Christmas honestly.

I prefer it over Christmas honestly.
- Wildschwein

You’re a moron and no one gives a shyt about fenwick.

Nurse has more major mistakes on chances against than major contributions to scoring chances. Guess who is still positive? Yup Klef.

http://edmontonjournal.co...-develop-jesse-puljujarvi
- Iggysbff

We are talking about defense here, not offense. Therefore we are strictly looking at Major mistakes & mistakes on scoring chances against. Therefore, I broke down each category down and normalized them according to time by the minute and correlated the relative team data. Here is what I got.



Now, I assume major mistakes refers to ones made in your own zone that lead to the goal against, not a major mistake on a chance for. Just making 100% sure.
For M-/T rel (mistakes against/time), above 1 is bad, below 1 is good.
For MM/T rel(major mistakes/time), same thing
MM/M- shows how many of the mistakes made are major.

Nurse seems to hold his own defensively in comparison to the team.

Klefbom has more major mistakes per minute of hockey compared to Nurse btw.
Also, if you want to use that stat (major mistakes), it means that Kris Russell is a defensive god that doesn't freak out (or starfish), plays calm, collective, defensive hockey in big moments against.

Come at me. (ง'̀-'́)ง

We are talking about defense here, not offense. Therefore we are strictly looking at Major mistakes & mistakes on scoring chances against. Therefore, I broke down each category and normalized them according to time. Here is what I got.



Now, I assume major mistakes refers to ones made in your own zone that lead to the goal against, not a major mistake on a chance for. Just making 100% sure.
For M-/T (mistakes against/time), above 1 is bad, below 1 is good.
For MM/T(major mistakes/time), same thing
MM/M- shows how many of the mistakes made are major.

Nurse seems to fare well defensively in comparison to the team, especially with respect to M-/T rel.

Klefbom has more major mistakes per minute of hockey compared to Nurse btw.
Also, if you want to use that stat (major mistakes), it means that Kris Russell is a defensive god that doesn't freak out (or starfish), plays calm, collective, defensive hockey in big moments against.

Come at me. (ง'̀-'́)ง
- EdmHockeyMan

Drink bleach!

Sometimes a simple "(frank) you" can say more than a novel ever could.
- Wildschwein

True, but hey, I like to argue and break down the other person's argument if I can or see their point of view and counter it. Kinda fun honestly.

Plus, I'm too polite to say that lol. Not much of a potty mouth either, unless you pass my breaking point.

You’re a moron and no one gives a shyt about fenwick.

Nurse has more major mistakes on chances against than major contributions to scoring chances. Guess who is still positive? Yup Klef.

http://edmontonjournal.co...-develop-jesse-puljujarvi
- Iggysbff

The very same charts that you've called me out for using because what constitutes scoring chances is pretty subjective are now the basis of your argument attempting to discredit someone using Fenwick (a FAR less subjective statistic). Interesting.

Also, Klefbom actually tracks worse than Nurse on the major contributions Vs major mistakes chart you're quoting (-0.78/15 for Nurse Vs -1.00/15 for Klefbom). He grades positively on the overall EV scoring chance +/- chart that's featured further down the (-0.15/15 for Nurse Vs +0.05/15 for Klefbom).

Not only changing your mind but also misquoting data? For shame, Iggy

True, but hey, I like to argue and break down the other person's argument if I can or see their point of view and counter it. Kinda fun honestly.

Plus, I'm too polite to say that lol. Not much of a potty mouth either, unless you pass my breaking point.
- EdmHockeyMan

(frank) you, ya filthy, socially-maladjusted, (frank)witted mongoloid twat-sack! Go eat the most egregiously large and slimy bag of severed zebra Richards that you can find.

If you're at a loss for where to find such a bag, try Laughs' closet. He's working on a big project to unveil a zebra Richard inspired dildo as well as a fleshlight designed for zebra Richards in order to take advantage of the massive market for zebra fleshlights. Its a burgeoning market that he's REALLY ahead of the curb on.

(frank) you, ya filthy, socially-maladjusted, (frank)witted mongoloid twat-sack! Go eat the most egregiously large and slimy bag of severed zebra Richards that you can find.

If you're at a loss for where to find such a bag, try Laughs' closet. He's working on a big project to unveil a zebra Richard inspired dildo as well as a fleshlight designed for zebra Richards in order to take advantage of the massive market for zebra fleshlights. Its a burgeoning market that he's REALLY ahead of the curb on.
- MaximumBone

- EdmHockeyMan

(frank) your "breaking point"

(frank) your "breaking point"
- MaximumBone

The very same charts that you've called me out for using because what constitutes scoring chances is pretty subjective are now the basis of your argument attempting to discredit someone using Fenwick (a FAR less subjective statistic). Interesting.

Also, Klefbom actually tracks worse than Nurse on the major contributions Vs major mistakes chart you're quoting (-0.78/15 for Nurse Vs -1.00/15 for Klefbom). He grades positively on the overall EV scoring chance +/- chart that's featured further down the (-0.15/15 for Nurse Vs +0.05/15 for Klefbom).

Not only changing your mind but also misquoting data? For shame, Iggy
- MaximumBone

This. Noticed the same things as well. Glad to see you did too.

Yup. That you’re a (frank)ing braggart.
- Wildschwein

True, but hey, I like to argue and break down the other person's argument if I can or see their point of view and counter it. Kinda fun honestly.

Plus, I'm too polite to say that lol. Not much of a potty mouth either, unless you pass my breaking point.
- EdmHockeyMan

Ĺook who you're arguing with originally. Facts are not a point it's about opinion or one person's perception of knowledge. Everyone else is a JB. Stop bringing facts and long winded replies to a window licking fight.

Bigger bust Yakupov or Bennett?

Gotta respect Glass for that. Glad Lucic kicked his ass because if you remember Glass made Kassian bleed.
- Jailbait

A)

B) Quit lowering the HB communities IQ. We need to see EK's blogs. That's bad enough.

We are talking about defense here, not offense. Therefore we are strictly looking at Major mistakes & mistakes on scoring chances against. Therefore, I broke down each category down and normalized them according to time by the minute and correlated the relative team data. Here is what I got.



Now, I assume major mistakes refers to ones made in your own zone that lead to the goal against, not a major mistake on a chance for. Just making 100% sure.
For M-/T rel (mistakes against/time), above 1 is bad, below 1 is good.
For MM/T rel(major mistakes/time), same thing
MM/M- shows how many of the mistakes made are major.

Nurse seems to hold his own defensively in comparison to the team.

Klefbom has more major mistakes per minute of hockey compared to Nurse btw.
Also, if you want to use that stat (major mistakes), it means that Kris Russell is a defensive god that doesn't freak out (or starfish), plays calm, collective, defensive hockey in big moments against.

Come at me. (ง'̀-'́)ง
- EdmHockeyMan

Jesus Christ you like to make shyt up to try to look smart. But all I does is make you look even dumber if that's possible. Get a life. Write a novel with a bunch of made up bs much Hallfan? Happy Easter edmhockeyfan

The very same charts that you've called me out for using because what constitutes scoring chances is pretty subjective are now the basis of your argument attempting to discredit someone using Fenwick (a FAR less subjective statistic). Interesting.

Also, Klefbom actually tracks worse than Nurse on the major contributions Vs major mistakes chart you're quoting (-0.78/15 for Nurse Vs -1.00/15 for Klefbom). He grades positively on the overall EV scoring chance +/- chart that's featured further down the (-0.15/15 for Nurse Vs +0.05/15 for Klefbom).

Not only changing your mind but also misquoting data? For shame, Iggy
- MaximumBone

What the (frank) are you talking about changing my mind?

Never have called you out for using chances. But yes there is some subjectivity in that and all of these so called stats. And not saying Klef hasn't made a lot of mistakes this year. But over all Nurse has made far more and yet some how edmhockeyfan says he's made huge strides defensively?

Happy Easter