Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Thomas Vanek's worth and key points on the line in Arizona for the Canucks
Author Message
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 25 @ 3:41 PM ET
No complaints about anyone that sticks up for the team NH
- VANTEL



Its been a long haul doing it also 😂

I’m of the proactive mind set in most things & that leads me to projections. I see us strong down the middle at C. On the wing i like the combinations of assets. In goal Demko looks like a beacon. Its D like most teams face that luck & drafting are the answer & difficult to do at that. The Preds model has been in full gear for a long long time & Poile does it wherever he has been. Most teams simply don’t copycat him enough & its most difficult to do. Picking D high takes patience & its risky too. Still it means avoiding picking them results in ling rebuilds to be contenders. Rare that instant fixes for a Crosby or McDavid come along & they alone are not enough to win it all.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 25 @ 3:41 PM ET
There's been loads of change in on-ice personnel but the organization's philosophy and approach really hasn't.
- bloatedmosquito

And I don't think it will, we have idiots running this organization from the owner on down.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 25 @ 3:42 PM ET
Won't happen, Domi's a former first round pick. Hutton is a bench warmer.

ARI sells high on Domi. NYR have the assets/smarts to pull a deal like that off.

- VanHockeyGuy



What assets? Picks excuded
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 25 @ 3:44 PM ET
There's been loads of change in on-ice personnel but the organization's philosophy and approach really hasn't.
- bloatedmosquito



True & the pain of waiting out loyal playets who served us well for years to retire. Talent depth is the huge hurdle & its only been a few drafts to get it replenished.
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Feb 25 @ 3:47 PM ET
If Vanek is moved are the negative nancies placated?
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 25 @ 3:48 PM ET
And I don't think it will, we have idiots running this organization from the owner on down.
- A_SteamingLombardi



Empty seats & lost revenue is their problem. On the ice once prospects are ready & TG has the pieces to use the Owner & TL won’t matter. FA hires hockey ppl & should let hockey ppl do their job.
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Feb 25 @ 3:48 PM ET
If Vanek is moved are the negative nancies placated?
- dbot


If vanek isnt moved, will the pom pom wavers finally clue in this team sucks with who we have on it?
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 25 @ 3:50 PM ET
If Vanek is moved are the negative nancies placated?
- dbot

No
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 25 @ 3:50 PM ET
If Vanek is moved are the negative nancies placated?
- dbot



Nothing placates them lol
If things brighten up their go to is reference to the past or female dogin about management.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 25 @ 3:50 PM ET
If vanek isnt moved, will the pom pom wavers finally clue in this team sucks with who we have on it?
- Codes1087

No

Even Pompom wavers don't spend money on this team.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Feb 25 @ 3:51 PM ET
If vanek isnt moved, will the pom pom wavers finally clue in this team sucks with who we have on it?
- Codes1087



First name one of these pom pommers who said we don’t suck? I know of none.
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Feb 25 @ 3:51 PM ET
If vanek isnt moved, will the pom pom wavers finally clue in this team sucks with who we have on it?
- Codes1087



wait wait wait.
You find more than one person on here that seriously don't think this team sucks and i'll eat my hat.

1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 25 @ 3:51 PM ET
If Vanek is moved are the negative nancies placated?
- dbot


I prefer bitter Barry, and not even a little
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Feb 25 @ 3:52 PM ET
No
- A_SteamingLombardi


I guess i knew that
Whiskey-Tango
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Classification: Bipolar-Tanker, QC
Joined: 12.10.2011

Feb 25 @ 3:53 PM ET
If Vanek is moved are the negative nancies placated?
- dbot


NO!
NEVER!
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Feb 25 @ 3:54 PM ET
I prefer bitter Barry, and not even a little
- 1970vintage




via GIPHY

Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Feb 25 @ 3:54 PM ET
wait wait wait.
You find more than one person on here that seriously don't think this team sucks and i'll eat my hat.


- dbot


Do Benning and Linden count?
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 25 @ 3:56 PM ET
Do Benning and Linden count?
- Nucker101

Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Feb 25 @ 3:56 PM ET
First name one of these pom pommers who said we don’t suck? I know of none.
- Nighthawk


Anyone who believes we are 3 years away from being competitive, or a few pieces away from competitive. Anyone who thinks trevor has the slightest clue into anything management related. Anyone who thinks we should keep vanek past 12:01 tomorrow. Anyone who is ok with mediocrity. Any of the above. Fair?
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Feb 25 @ 3:56 PM ET
Do Benning and Linden count?
- Nucker101


Clearly not.
Only the sharpest hockey minds are on here and qualify.
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Feb 25 @ 3:58 PM ET
wait wait wait.
You find more than one person on here that seriously don't think this team sucks and i'll eat my hat.


- dbot


People like gudbransons signing. People like green. People like linden and benning. People have said they are ok with vanek past TDL. People are ok the sedins being re-signed a year or two longer. If you are ok with any of the above, you are a pom pom waver. Cause no change = constant path of not only mediocrity, but failure, as we have seen.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 25 @ 3:58 PM ET
Anyone who believes we are 3 years away from being competitive, or a few pieces away from competitive. Anyone who thinks trevor has the slightest clue into anything management related. Anyone who thinks we should keep vanek past 12:01 tomorrow. Anyone who is ok with mediocrity. Any of the above. Fair?
- Codes1087

dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Feb 25 @ 3:58 PM ET
Anyone who believes we are 3 years away from being competitive, or a few pieces away from competitive. Anyone who thinks trevor has the slightest clue into anything management related. Anyone who thinks we should keep vanek past 12:01 tomorrow. Anyone who is ok with mediocrity. Any of the above. Fair?
- Codes1087




via GIPHY

Bettmanhatesus
Joined: 08.10.2016

Feb 25 @ 3:59 PM ET
Friends that are oiler fans were rubbing it in on me when lucic picked the oilers over the nucks and I laughed and said he will play himself out of the league in 2 to 3 years and they all said I was nuts
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 25 @ 3:59 PM ET
Anyone who believes we are 3 years away from being competitive, or a few pieces away from competitive. Anyone who thinks trevor has the slightest clue into anything management related. Anyone who thinks we should keep vanek past 12:01 tomorrow. Anyone who is ok with mediocrity. Any of the above. Fair?
- Codes1087


I believe any team can be three years away from being competitive as long as idiots aren't running the show
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29  Next