Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Penalty kill crushes Canucks against Avs and make your best deadline deal
Author Message
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Clit Whisperer
Joined: 10.22.2011

Feb 21 @ 8:10 PM ET
But he’s a Clint, I was talking Chucks. You could have said Charlie Brown, or Charles Manson, Charlton Heston even.
- 1970vintage


Oh, didn't understand the rules.

How about Chuck Liddell? He was pretty tough at one point.

canucker4life
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 02.21.2018

Feb 21 @ 8:11 PM ET
Aha, I see, a clint man eh. No need for a big D when you have a clint patrolling the slot.
- 1970vintage


You bet.
canucker4life
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 02.21.2018

Feb 21 @ 8:13 PM ET
Oh, didn't understand the rules.

How about Chuck Liddell? He was pretty tough at one point.

- bloatedmosquito


Do you see Liddell with a cigar preparing to kick the crap out of people?
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Feb 21 @ 8:18 PM ET
Rick Dhaliwal;

"I still think 70% chance Tanev goes"
canucker4life
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 02.21.2018

Feb 21 @ 8:21 PM ET
Rick Dhaliwal;

"I still think 70% chance Tanev goes"

- VanHockeyGuy


Well now that Ottawa is supposedly listening to offers for Karlsson, I think Tanev has a better chance getting moved in the summer.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 21 @ 8:21 PM ET
Carcone from Cassels and Bocher 2-2
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Feb 21 @ 8:22 PM ET
Well now that Ottawa is supposedly listening to offers for Karlsson, I think Tanev has a better chance getting moved in the summer.
- canucker4life


He thinks at TDL
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 21 @ 8:23 PM ET
Well now that Ottawa is supposedly listening to offers for Karlsson, I think Tanev has a better chance getting moved in the summer.
- canucker4life


Ottawa is going to want that 4 first round pick type of return, could make Tanev at half the price look reasonable
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 21 @ 8:24 PM ET
Rick Dhaliwal;

"I still think 70% chance Tanev goes"

- VanHockeyGuy


Bellows Vande Sopel and a second
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 21 @ 8:29 PM ET
If you came here to wave your pom-poms you can f*ck off.
- Marwood

VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 21 @ 8:29 PM ET
Rick Dhaliwal@DhaliwalSports
43m43 minutes ago

Utica coach Trent Cull on Sportsnet 650 says he does not think Thatcher Demko is ready for the NHL, "If you ask me, I say no, That is my opinion. "You can't rush a goaltender. He's only in his second year right now, very few make the jump quicker than that."
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Clit Whisperer
Joined: 10.22.2011

Feb 21 @ 8:30 PM ET
Rick Dhaliwal;

"I still think 70% chance Tanev goes"

- VanHockeyGuy


So Rick thinks he's going to be traded.

I don't understand the whole X% thing.
canucker4life
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 02.21.2018

Feb 21 @ 8:30 PM ET
He thinks at TDL
- VanHockeyGuy


Yep - tossup but who would want Tanev the most Tampa because their defence is a little suspect after 1st pair. Sergachev was even benched because he's inconsistent like most rookies. Tam could also want Karlsson but have a big prospect pipeline almost ready to play in the NHL plus young pieces Ott might want in a cap dump for them.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 21 @ 8:32 PM ET
Carcone 2 nd from Boucher and Chapput 3-2 Comets
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Feb 21 @ 8:32 PM ET
So Rick thinks he's going to be traded.

I don't understand the whole X% thing.

- bloatedmosquito


I don't know, he said "Just gut feeling, Let’s see where it goes"
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 21 @ 8:33 PM ET
So Rick thinks he's going to be traded.

I don't understand the whole X% thing.

- bloatedmosquito

Dhaliwal only posts things that he has researched
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 21 @ 8:34 PM ET
So Rick thinks he's going to be traded.

I don't understand the whole X% thing.

- bloatedmosquito


Ask Ek to explain it to you.
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Feb 21 @ 8:35 PM ET
Dhaliwal only posts things that he has researched
- VANTEL


he sent that in a text message
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 21 @ 8:41 PM ET
So Rick thinks he's going to be traded.

I don't understand the whole X% thing.

- bloatedmosquito

E4, is that better?
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Feb 21 @ 8:42 PM ET
E4, is that better?
- A_SteamingLombardi

Eldebrink
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Port Compton, BC
Joined: 08.18.2016

Feb 21 @ 8:43 PM ET
If the season were to end today we would be picking in the 8 -9 spot with our luck.
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Clit Whisperer
Joined: 10.22.2011

Feb 21 @ 8:44 PM ET
Ask Ek to explain it to you.
- 1970vintage


The whole percentage thing is totally misused.

You give something a 'percentage of likelihood' only if it happens numerous times. Like, a rocket has a 75% chance of misfiring on takeoff. Meaning 3 out of 4 times the rocket will not take off.

How the (frank) can you apply that rule to something that only happens once?
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Feb 21 @ 8:44 PM ET
E4, is that better?
- A_SteamingLombardi

That means hearing it from at least 2 sober sources?
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Clit Whisperer
Joined: 10.22.2011

Feb 21 @ 8:45 PM ET
E4, is that better?
- A_SteamingLombardi


Actually, yes. It has about the same significance.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 21 @ 8:47 PM ET
The whole percentage think is totally misused.

You give something a 'percentage of likelihood' only if it happens numerous times. Like, a rocket has a 75% chance of misfiring on takeoff. Meaning 3 out of 4 times the rocket will not take off.

How the (frank) can you apply that rule to something that only happens once?

- bloatedmosquito


But HOW likely is it to occur once? Very likely, somewhat likely or not very likely at all?

JK, it’s all a crock to get hits or likes or swipes or whatever...
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45  Next