LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
To be fair, if Gydbranson was only making $3,500,000 those goals wouldn’t have been scored - CanuckDon
|
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
If Tanev agrees. - manvanfan
He's from TO, that's one team interested. If there's any truth to this he would/will have given JB a list right? |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
so get a 4th? get anything for him at this point. Vanek has absolutely no reason to be a Canuck after the TDL, and the Canucks have absolutely no reason for him after the TDL. It benefits the club, and player, to move him. If they want to talk in the summer about another year, so be it, but it doesn't make sense to keep him out of good will for an extension. Take the best offer Benning - Codes1087
They may want to re-sign him like...
|
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Dhaliwal
Text this morning;
"Been told 2 teams are very aggressive after Tanev - he could get moved"
- VanHockeyGuy
TO or WPG? |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
He's from TO, that's one team interested. If there's any truth to this he would/will have given JB a list right? - VanHockeyGuy
He has a 10 team trade list i believe but they arent shopping him. Just taking calls. If a team comes with a deal then he could just ask if he would waive. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
TO or WPG? - LordHumungous
He only confirmed TO interest, didn't elaborate on the other. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
TO or WPG? - LordHumungous
TB has been kicking tires on a lot of D ive read. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
He has a 10 team trade list i believe but they arent shopping him. Just taking calls. If a team comes with a deal then he could just ask if he would waive. - manvanfan
Ten teams is better than we had with Kesler. I don't think Tanev's in love with VAN as much as Edler is. |
|
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.24.2014
|
|
|
They may want to re-sign him like...
- VanHockeyGuy
re-signing him before the season is over, before, or after the TDL would be the TRUE pom pom way |
|
|
|
so get a 4th? get anything for him at this point. Vanek has absolutely no reason to be a Canuck after the TDL, and the Canucks have absolutely no reason for him after the TDL. It benefits the club, and player, to move him. If they want to talk in the summer about another year, so be it, but it doesn't make sense to keep him out of good will for an extension. Take the best offer Benning - Codes1087
Thats ridiculous - If JB accepts a 4th for Vanek then everyone gets pissed he got fleeced. He's worth more than that. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Thats ridiculous - If JB accepts a 4th for Vanek then everyone gets pissed he got fleeced. He's worth more than that. - Brooks_Light
Therein lies the problem. The chance JB stands pat on Vanek. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Therein lies the problem. The chance JB stands pat on Vanek. - VanHockeyGuy
Should have just re-signed Hamhuis way back when. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Should have just re-signed Hamhuis way back when. - manvanfan
That and Vrbata sticks in peoples minds right? |
|
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.24.2014
|
|
|
Thats ridiculous - If JB accepts a 4th for Vanek then everyone gets pissed he got fleeced. He's worth more than that. - Brooks_Light
I wasn't quite being literal, but at the same time, I would take the absolute best offer thrown at Benning for Vanek and call it a win. I just see absolutely no point in keeping him this season. |
|
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.24.2014
|
|
|
That and Vrbata sticks in peoples minds right? - VanHockeyGuy
those are both viewed as missed opportunities by Benning though... |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
I wasn't quite being literal, but at the same time, I would take the absolute best offer thrown at Benning for Vanek and call it a win. I just see absolutely no point in keeping him this season. - Codes1087
JB want's him to "teach" BB, mentor him. His agent may give him a discount so Vanek doesn't go to UFA.
It didn't work out to good for him last year |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
No worries JB's a shrewd negotiator, he won't leave anything on the table, or miss any opportunities. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Thats ridiculous - If JB accepts a 4th for Vanek then everyone gets pissed he got fleeced. He's worth more than that. - Brooks_Light
A 3rd or tell other teams to frank off. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
those are both viewed as missed opportunities by Benning though... - Codes1087
How? He had zero offers on Vrbata? how did he mess that up? Vrbata also got zero offers last season. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
That and Vrbata sticks in peoples minds right? - VanHockeyGuy
Yup. People wanted value for them, it wasnt there. Calgary got basically a mid second for russell and two scrubs.
In the end if JB has no plan on keeping them. You take what you can get. If it came down to it. Id ask a 4th and 6th for Vanek. Anything past round 3 is a shot in the dark. Might as while maximise. |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
so get a 4th? get anything for him at this point. Vanek has absolutely no reason to be a Canuck after the TDL, and the Canucks have absolutely no reason for him after the TDL. It benefits the club, and player, to move him. If they want to talk in the summer about another year, so be it, but it doesn't make sense to keep him out of good will for an extension. Take the best offer Benning - Codes1087
|
|
Eldebrink
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Port Compton, BC Joined: 08.18.2016
|
|
|
Rick Dhaliwal
@DhaliwalSports
Following Following @DhaliwalSports
More
Source on Vanek, "Teams kicking tires on Vanek, if right deal #Canucks will move him but it's not definite that he will be moved, could be 50-50."
7:24 AM - 21 Feb 2018 - VanHockeyGuy
Brilliant reporting Mr. Dahiwal.
|
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
A 3rd or tell other teams to frank off. - CanuckDon
And he does, Vanek stays with us post TDL. Sorted. |
|
anavar
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 02.29.2008
|
|
|
those are both viewed as missed opportunities by Benning though... - Codes1087
I think this is a damned if you do damned if you don't. No matter what happens with Vanek it won't be the right call. I can't see us getting a 2nd or 3rd so fans won't be happy with less. If we keep him lots of people will be like we should have gotten anything for him. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Brilliant reporting Mr. Dahiwal. - Eldebrink
He's the best local guy. |
|