Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks celebrate Chinese New Year with blowout win over Bruins
Author Message
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Feb 20 @ 1:47 PM ET

- RealityChecker

Pres.cup
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Making the most of the worst situation... Canuck fan 4life , BC
Joined: 12.23.2014

Feb 20 @ 1:47 PM ET
.... ....
- RealityChecker

boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Feb 20 @ 1:49 PM ET
His play is a NTC in and of itself
- 1970vintage



1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 20 @ 1:51 PM ET
???

I'm happy

- Nucker101


Three more seasons should even out with the start of the upswing. Make the playoffs in the 4th year, after Guddy is gone and Benning is gone.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Feb 20 @ 1:53 PM ET
say it with me: PLAYOFFS 2019

It's happening!

- neem55

Fixed.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 20 @ 1:53 PM ET
I wonder if Benning has been given clear instructions that no player contract can run longer than his GM term?
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Feb 20 @ 1:53 PM ET
The way the contract is structured makes it seem like they'd be open to moving him in year 3, unless they want to re-sign him again.

I'm cool with stopgaps, but this team needs extra draft picks. I'd much rather have an extra 2nd rounder in this draft and then go out and sign a stopgap bottom pairing vet dman this summer, even if it's an older guy.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Feb 20 @ 1:54 PM ET
Fixed.
- manvanfan

Ok ok, we both know I would never say that
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Feb 20 @ 1:55 PM ET
I wonder if Benning has been given clear instructions that no player contract can run longer than his GM term?
- 1970vintage

I know you're joking, but some of these ownership conspiracy theories are getting out of control.

boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Feb 20 @ 1:55 PM ET

- RealityChecker


Not burning very clean. I'd talk to your guy.
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Feb 20 @ 1:59 PM ET
The way the contract is structured makes it seem like they'd be open to moving him in year 3, unless they want to re-sign him again.

I'm cool with stopgaps, but this team needs extra draft picks. I'd much rather have an extra 2nd rounder in this draft and then go out and sign a stopgap bottom pairing vet dman this summer, even if it's an older guy.

- Nucker101

πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Feb 20 @ 2:01 PM ET
The way the contract is structured makes it seem like they'd be open to moving him in year 3, unless they want to re-sign him again.

I'm cool with stopgaps, but this team needs extra draft picks. I'd much rather have an extra 2nd rounder in this draft and then go out and sign a stopgap bottom pairing vet dman this summer, even if it's an older guy.

- Nucker101


stop gaps are fine. stop gaps in year 4 or 5 of a rebuild is not ideal, but ok that's fine. What is lost a bit amongst the signing is the fact that the organization refuses to address the glaring issues on D. Our D has been one of the worst in the league for the last 3 years, both defensively, and offensive contributions. This deal kind of just says " we will continue with what we have and hope for better results". Edler is back next year, Tanev isn't getting traded, Hutton is back next year. DP + Stecher + Biega are the RFA's. I just want to see a sign of improvement, and this signing doesn't do that.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 20 @ 2:03 PM ET
Now we just need the Sedins to sign a two year extension and Vanek for another year
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Feb 20 @ 2:05 PM ET
Ok ok, we both know I would never say that
- neem55

πŸ˜‚

LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Feb 20 @ 2:05 PM ET
Thinking is hard
- Canada Cup

Thanks CC!!
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Feb 20 @ 2:06 PM ET
Now we just need the Sedins to sign a two year extension and Vanek for another year
- A_SteamingLombardi

That’ll definitely help our draft position next year!!!
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Feb 20 @ 2:06 PM ET
stop gaps are fine. stop gaps in year 4 or 5 of a rebuild is not ideal, but ok that's fine. What is lost a bit amongst the signing is the fact that the organization refuses to address the glaring issues on D. Our D has been one of the worst in the league for the last 3 years, both defensively, and offensive contributions. This deal kind of just says " we will continue with what we have and hope for better results". Edler is back next year, Tanev isn't getting traded, Hutton is back next year. DP + Stecher + Biega are the RFA's. I just want to see a sign of improvement, and this signing doesn't do that.
- Codes1087


I missed trade deadline I guess.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Feb 20 @ 2:06 PM ET
Carol has obviously been waiting for the news to break.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Feb 20 @ 2:08 PM ET
stop gaps are fine. stop gaps in year 4 or 5 of a rebuild is not ideal, but ok that's fine. What is lost a bit amongst the signing is the fact that the organization refuses to address the glaring issues on D. Our D has been one of the worst in the league for the last 3 years, both defensively, and offensive contributions. This deal kind of just says " we will continue with what we have and hope for better results". Edler is back next year, Tanev isn't getting traded, Hutton is back next year. DP + Stecher + Biega are the RFA's. I just want to see a sign of improvement, and this signing doesn't do that.
- Codes1087

The deal says we could get rid of everyone like the TML and then once we have really good forwards. We can suck because we dont have a defence. Lets over pay for one now.

I agree finding even decent serviceable defence runs a cost of at least a 3rd round pick for trash ones.
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Feb 20 @ 2:08 PM ET
everything is fine
- Nucker101

CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Feb 20 @ 2:09 PM ET
Now we just need the Sedins to sign a two year extension and Vanek for another year
- A_SteamingLombardi

That would be amazing
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Feb 20 @ 2:09 PM ET
I missed trade deadline I guess.

- boonerbuck


I will have a box of tissues ready for you on feb 27th booner
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Feb 20 @ 2:09 PM ET

- LordHumungous

LOL 🀣
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Feb 20 @ 2:10 PM ET

- LordHumungous

Most in here quit paddling all together. Drowning is worse then jumping off a cliff.
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Feb 20 @ 2:11 PM ET
The deal says we could get rid of everyone like the TML and then once we have really good forwards. We can suck because we dont have a defence. Lets over pay for one now.

I agree finding even decent serviceable defence runs a cost of at least a 3rd round pick for trash ones.

- manvanfan


another silver lining,
One of the canucks bloggers said that Gudbransons deal ends the year that a bunch of our prospects will be exiting their ELC's. (Gaudette, Dahlen, EP, Gadjovich, Lind, all probable) If Benning see's this as a rebuild, maybe 2022/2023 is the date he thinks we will be competitive
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45  Next