His last few games since the scratch he’s been better defensively. But of course since I said that now u will all say he’s been terrible. I see what’s going on here.
- nyrangers9479

Jim??

The Preds game had me sweating the parlay
- rangerdanger94

Ha I had them too at -205. Between them and the Rangers I was laying like 590 to win 250

Wasn't that easy.

- Pete V

After Buffalo tied it late I figured I was done

His last few games since the scratch he’s been better defensively. But of course since I said that now u will all say he’s been terrible. I see what’s going on here.
- nyrangers9479

Yes. Thats what I do.. You have a serious complex.

I have agreed with several of your posts including looking at options of trading McDonagh, so if you think I would be as childish just to disagree with you, so be it.

After Buffalo tied it late I figured I was done
- Vukota

Kind of wish they lost now.

Kind of wish they lost now.
- mdw7413

fack you

Yes. Thats what I do.. You have a serious complex.

I have agreed with several of your posts including looking at options of trading McDonagh, so if you think I would be as childish just to disagree with you, so be it.
- mdw7413

You are my spirit animal right now.

You are my spirit animal right now.
- tomburton99

Don't think we'll be selling. Two big wins against formidable opponents.
I for one like our chances out west... Mark my words, we will be buyers at the deadline and have a deep run, at least to the ECF.....

- mdw7413

Ha I had them too at -205. Between them and the Rangers I was laying like 590 to win 250
- Vukota

I risked 100 to win 121 on a Rangers/Preds parlay ha

- tomburton99

I risked 100 to win 121 on a Rangers/Preds parlay ha
- rangerdanger94

Ok i'm not up on the whole betting thing but basically you won 21 bucks?

I risked 100 to win 121 on a Rangers/Preds parlay ha
- rangerdanger94

Nice I went back and checked I was laying 495 to win 250. I lost my 3 team parlay. It was 25 to win 319. Rangers - 1 1/2 Caps - 1 1/2 and Preds

Ok i'm not up on the whole betting thing but basically you won 21 bucks?
- mdw7413

No dack he won 121. He was gambling 100 to win 121. Go back to bed

- tomburton99

No dack he won 121. He was gambling 100 to win 121. Go back to bed
- Vukota

Yeah, so he already had a 100, he won 21 bucks

Yeah, so he already had a 100, he won 21 bucks
- mdw7413

That's not how it works. If he lost he would owe 100. He won so he gets 121

Ok i'm not up on the whole betting thing but basically you won 21 bucks?
- mdw7413

Yeah. Basically he got 1/5 odds. Terrible return wise, but almost impossible to lose

That's not how it works
- Vukota

Thats why I'm asking.

Only thing I ever real bet was horses. Pretty cut and dry

Thats why I'm asking.

Only thing I ever real bet was horses. Pretty cut and dry
- mdw7413

You're right in thinking that. A horse that goes off and 1/5 nets a 20 cent return on the minimum 2 dollar bet.

Thats why I'm asking.

Only thing I ever real bet was horses. Pretty cut and dry
- mdw7413

If he was in Vegas he would have to pay the 100 up front and he would have gotten back 221. Since he didn't have to lay it out he gets back what he won which is 121

You're right in thinking that. A horse that goes off and 1/5 nets a 20 cent return on the minimum 2 dollar bet.
- tomburton99

Is that NHL math or AHL math?

You're right in thinking that. A horse that goes off and 1/5 nets a 20 cent return on the minimum 2 dollar bet.
- tomburton99

A friend of mine in HS his dad was a harness racing jockey. We would go to Freehold and bet all the time. Got some good tips.

Is that NHL math or AHL math?
- climbdenali12

No, that's the law when gambling a sactioned track. As the odds go up, hence the return on the best also rise.