LeftyFU = Confirmation bias. Using a couple past examples from a system that no linger exists under the modern lotto while ignoring the many failures.
- Nuck4U

So you can use revisionary history to say it doesn't work, even though you say it was a different system, but I can't say it does work

It's ok, I got your back
- LeftCoaster

It was obvious by your private thread exchanges and PM's it went beyond being leaders of team tank and team unrealistic into being kinderbuzz provocateurs.

https://www.google.ca/img...j_AigoMCg&iact=mrc&uact=8

I think this might help, i would have posted as an image but... coc.

It was obvious by your private thread exchanges and PM's it went beyond being leaders of team tank and team unrealistic into being kinderbuzz provocateurs.
- Nuck4U

Private thread exchanges? Pms? I want in...

8-2 for the DeadWings....a real thumping!! Eddie Lack .667 Sv %

Matthew Tkachuk: 10 Minute Misconduct

Matthew Tkachuk: 5 Minute Major for Spearing

So you can use revisionary history to say it doesn't work, even though you say it was a different system, but I can't say it does work
- LeftCoaster

That's pretzel twisting logic. Facts are new system doesn't reward failure. Like getting the can't miss generational talent. Designing and setting your team for failure to not get rewarded is not smart. Not to mention the damage effects.

Plus having high draft picks are great. But that doesn't mean they work out to expectations or there aren't any busts.

Key is quality drafting from 1st to 7th round. Keeping your top picks. Development both of the prospects and youth into top team and system. Plus savvy moves. That is smart and less reckless rebuilding.

8-2 for the DeadWings....a real thumping!! Eddie Lack .667 Sv %

Matthew Tkachuk: 10 Minute Misconduct

Matthew Tkachuk: 5 Minute Major for Spearing
- LeftCoaster

Wow, tchunck is a real winner

That's pretzel twisting logic. Facts are new system doesn't reward failure. That is getting the can't miss generational talent. Designing and setting your team for failure to not get rewarded is not smart. Not to mention the damage effects.

Plus having high draft picks are great. But that doesn't mean they work out to expectations or there aren't any busts.

Key is quality drafting from 1st to 7th round. Keeping your top picks. Development both of the prospects and youth into top team and system. Plus savvy moves. That is smart and less reckless rebuilding.
- Nuck4U

Butt being bottom 3 sure helped Toronto and Edmonton

Butt being bottom 3 sure helped Toronto and Edmonton
- Pres.cup

They became more entertaining but have not accomplished anything. Plus Toronto was exception not the rule. Oilers were under previous set up and why they changed things so new set up doesn't reward.

Private thread exchanges? Pms? I want in...
- Pres.cup

They didn't think you qualified... but it was entertaining following it all.

trade is showing very early signs of being on the same win scale as Granlund vs Shink as Jim Bennings better trades

#silverlinings

trade is showing very early signs of being on the same win scale as Granlund vs Shink as Jim Bennings better trades

#silverlinings
- Codes1087

- A_SteamingLombardi

trade is showing very early signs of being on the same win scale as Granlund vs Shink as Jim Bennings better trades

#silverlinings
- Codes1087

Liked the trade at the time because of thin D depth of young players and it's working out great.

Liked the trade at the time because of thin D depth of young players and it's working out great.
- Nuck4U

I liked the trade at the time, didn't care for the thrown in 4th round pick, but had no clue that Pouliout would be this good/surprising.

I liked the trade at the time, didn't care for the thrown in 4th round pick, but had no clue that Pouliout would be this good/surprising.
- Codes1087

So, what you're saying is that you were wrong?

trade is showing very early signs of being on the same win scale as Granlund vs Shink as Jim Bennings better trades

#silverlinings
- Codes1087

I can't find Erikssons corsi data for this year and last, could you find and post it or send me a link.

Thanks

So, what you're saying is that you were wrong?
- Marwood

Lol

I wanted to trade Kessler for Sutter and pullout.

We got way more, and saved guance by sacrificing sbisa, so I'm super happy with Benning and his trading.

I liked the trade at the time, didn't care for the thrown in 4th round pick, but had no clue that Pouliout would be this good/surprising.
- Codes1087

Uhm the trade was based on the pick the AHL plug was the throw in to keep contract room this season for prospect signings.

Asset management wise Canucks gave up a 3rd and 4th round for an 8th overall. Not bad.

So, what you're saying is that you were wrong?
- Marwood

Absolutely. I liked pedan for pouliot but criticised including more picks. I must admit the 4th round pick is essentially null now

Uhm the trade was based on the pick the AHL plug was the throw in to keep contract room this season for prospect signings.

Asset management wise Canucks gave up a 3rd and 4th round for an 8th overall. Not bad.
- Nuck4U

Once a player is drafted, his draft position isnt really important. Guddy was a 3rd overall.... Sutter 11th overall. It doesnt mean anything other than expectations before that player plays in the show

Once a player is drafted, his draft position isnt really important. Guddy was a 3rd overall.... Sutter 11th overall. It doesnt mean anything other than expectations before that player plays in the show
- Codes1087

I think that we have the most high picks on a team or close to it. Boo number ones but lots of top ten .

Once a player is drafted, his draft position isnt really important. Guddy was a 3rd overall.... Sutter 11th overall. It doesnt mean anything other than expectations before that player plays in the show
- Codes1087

Still has relevance when they are not established NHL players and prospects trying to make it.

Why Sutter and Guddy trades are not comparisons. Much like missing that the Pouliot trade was based on the 4th round pick.

Still has relevance when they are not established NHL players and prospects trying to make it.

Why Sutter and Guddy trades are not comparisons. Much like missing that the Pouliot trade was based on the 4th round pick.
- Nuck4U

Uhmmm.... sorry, but, how old were Sutter and gudbranson when we traded for them?

Can you provide what measure makes the Wings better then the Canucks

Further the unrealistic statement that Stecher is an all world pro confirms the spewing of hyperbole over thoughtful opinion or factual discussion.
- Nuck4U

Thanks for confirmation of my my post, I tried several times to engage with thoughtful engagements only to see you ignore all those posts to continue with a one track thought. So hyperbole it is, Detroit is heads and shoulders better, but I can’t seem to penetrate the Pom Pom Nuck4U bias.

Carry on