Apparently not
- Dkos

what the (frank)

Welcome to the NHL Sanheim , pick up your jock as just got absolutely walked around, mind you Ghost wasn't much help.
- Skinner

Plind, welcome back

HAHA...Good job NHL

Well thanks for that loss Neuvirth!!!! brutal goaltending, after we were within a goal late, he lets a shot from behind centre ice hit the post

I can't say anything bad. That should be a 6-5 win.

(frank) those refs.

what the (frank)
- feelingkettle

No idea

That's a tough one. Well at least they can bounce back........against Toronto

I can't say anything bad. That should be a 6-5 win.

(frank) those refs.
- hereticpride

We had a horrible game and still should of won.

Cant wait to see how annoying this is going to be if they lose by 1.
- opeth_pa

The puck was still moving. When it comes to a stop, its in his glove, behind the line. This completes the play.

NHL, Youre COMPLETE trash

Nope, no conclusive evidence it crossed the line
- Buzzo

It was obviously in lol... He said play was complete so I'm assuming it just didn't go in until after the whistle or as he was blowing the whistle. Who know. (frank) them

That's a tough one. Well at least they can bounce back........against Toronto
- Pelle31Forever

HaXstall in goal

The puck was still moving. When it comes to a stop, its in his glove, behind the line. This completes the play.

NHL, Youre COMPLETE trash
- KINGKENZO

It's all about the intent to blow the whistle there. I can live with that. The previous disallowed goal bothers me.

The puck was still moving. When it comes to a stop, its in his glove, behind the line. This completes the play.

NHL, Youre COMPLETE trash
- KINGKENZO

It doesn't matter if he blew the whistle already or he rules he was in the act of blowing the whistle. It's horse poop

Bill Meltzer
@billmeltzer
The "play was complete" was nonsense. Anderson didn't have it until it was in his glove... which was inside the net.

I know you want to sit there with a unbuttoned shirt Morganti

It's all about the intent to blow the whistle there. I can live with that. The previous disallowed goal bothers me.
- MJL

its weak. intent to blow the whistle means he lost sight of the puck, which means he blew the play.....incompetence and its rampant among NHL officals

hahahah...Morganti just pointed out the puck was still moving, hes reading my posts

Bill Meltzer
@billmeltzer
The "play was complete" was nonsense. Anderson didn't have it until it was in his glove... which was inside the net.
- opeth_pa

bills reading my posts, too

its weak. intent to blow the whistle means he lost sight of the puck, which means he blew the play.....incompetence and its rampant among NHL officals

hahahah...Morganti just pointed out the puck was still moving, hes reading my posts
- KINGKENZO

its weak. intent to blow the whistle means he lost sight of the puck, which means he blew the play.....incompetence and its rampant among NHL officals

hahahah...Morganti just pointed out the puck was still moving, hes reading my posts
- KINGKENZO

By rule the ref is supposed to blow the whistle when he loses sight of the puck. I don't know how you say he blew the play. Pretty much impossible from the ice to know where the puck was in that situation. If we didn't have the overhead view we wouldn't even know where it was. The puck moving doesn't matter if the ref lost sight of the puck. It sucks because it was in the net. I have more issue with the other disallowed goal even though that was very close.

By rule the ref is supposed to blow the whistle when he loses sight of the puck. I don't know how you say he blew the play. Pretty much impossible from the ice to know where the puck was in that situation. If we didn't have the overhead view we wouldn't even know where it was. The puck moving doesn't matter if the ref lost sight of the puck. It sucks because it was in the net. I have more issue with the other disallowed goal even though that was very close.
- MJL

Very easily, he did

Very easily, he did
- KINGKENZO

In my opinion there is no basis for that.

Looking at the 2 no goals and the Gudas Major..

The Gudas Major I just dont see ..Maybe a 2 min charge but I know they are trying to take physical play out of the game in favor of skill.

The "play was complete" no goal..If you go by the rules then it makes sense that the ref lost site of the puck and blew it dead. HEll we needed a special view to see it.

The goalie interference is one of the worst calls I have seen. Honestly..I get tryhing to protect the goalies but joke is league is a joke.

Sam Carchidi
@BroadStBull
Flyers did not play well in 1st period, but deserved at least a point tonight. NHL took it away from them. Somewhere, Ed Snider is boiling.

By rule the ref is supposed to blow the whistle when he loses sight of the puck. I don't know how you say he blew the play. Pretty much impossible from the ice to know where the puck was in that situation. If we didn't have the overhead view we wouldn't even know where it was. The puck moving doesn't matter if the ref lost sight of the puck. It sucks because it was in the net. I have more issue with the other disallowed goal even though that was very close.
- MJL

I have to agree with Haxstol on the disallowed goals. The first one was a judgement call. The flyer player was in the crease. He did bump the goalie. I can understand that call The second went in the net clearly. The play was not complete. It was a goal.