Maybe Ferland can make McDavid look like Steve Moore!?!
- InSutterWeTrust

Is this you asking for help???
- Clyde334

Why win 10-2 when you can win 18-0?

Go Flames!!!!!!

Although with your goaltending you're gonna need more help then my kind words to help our tank....

Smith pulled again tonight

Smith pulled again tonight
- time2produce

LOL, It's going to be a reoccurring theme.

Definition of reoccurring posted below for those fans to dim to understand the nuances of the English language.

re·oc·cur
ˌrēəˈkər/
verb
gerund or present participle: reoccurring
occur again or repeatedly.
"ulcers tend to reoccur after treatment has stopped"

reoccur [ˌriːəˈkɜː] vb -curs, -curring, -curred (intr) to happen, take place, or come about again reoccurrence n Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003

LOL, It's going to be a reoccurring theme
- Pres.cup

That is not a word.

That is not a word.
- FLflames34

Those two Goalies that you have playing net, are not NHL caliber goalies.



And, just to be a grammar Nazi...

Actually "that" is a word.

T͟Hat,T͟Hət/
pronoun
pronoun: that; pronoun: those
1.
used to identify a specific person or thing observed by the speaker.
"that's his wife over there"
referring to the more distant of two things near to the speaker (the other, if specified, being identified by “this”).
"this is stronger than that"

If that was not what you were trying to say, perhaps the use of punctuation and/or complete sentence structure would help to clarify.

Those two Goalies that you have playing net, are not NHL caliber goalies.



And, just to be a grammar Nazi...

Actually "that" is a word.

T͟Hat,T͟Hət/
pronoun
pronoun: that; pronoun: those
1.
used to identify a specific person or thing observed by the speaker.
"that's his wife over there"
referring to the more distant of two things near to the speaker (the other, if specified, being identified by “this”).
"this is stronger than that"
2.
referring to a specific thing previously mentioned, known, or understood.
"that's a good idea"
3.
used in singling out someone or something and ascribing a distinctive feature to them.
"it is part of human nature to be attracted to that which is aesthetically pleasing"
4.
used to introduce a defining or restrictive clause, especially one essential to identification.
instead of “which,” “who,” or “whom”.
"the book that I've just written"
instead of “when” after an expression of time.
"the year that Anna was born"
determiner
determiner: that; determiner: those
1.
used to identify a specific person or thing observed or heard by the speaker.
"look at that man there"
referring to the more distant of two things near to the speaker (the other, if specified, being identified by “this”).
2.
referring to a specific thing previously mentioned, known, or understood.
"he lived in Mysore at that time"
3.
used in singling out someone or something and ascribing a distinctive feature to them.
"I have always envied those people who make their own bread"
4.
referring to a specific person or thing assumed as understood or familiar to the person being addressed.
"where is that son of yours?"
adverb
adverb: that
1.
to such a degree; so.
"I would not go that far"
used with a gesture to indicate size.
"it was that big, perhaps even bigger"
informal
very.
"he wasn't that far away"
conjunction
conjunction: that
1.
introducing a subordinate clause expressing a statement or hypothesis.
"she said that she was satisfied"
expressing a reason or cause.
"he seemed pleased that I wanted to continue"
expressing a result.
"she was so tired that she couldn't think"
expressing a purpose, hope, or intention.
"we pray that the coming year may be a year of peace"
2.
literary
expressing a wish or regret.
"oh that he could be restored to health"

If that was not what you were trying to say, perhaps the use of punctuation and/or complete sentence structure would help to clarify.
- Pres.cup

Well then...

Why win 10-2 when you can win 18-0?
- Larsson_fan

Well then...


- Wildschwein

Yep. Sooner rather than later. Dude should be in the NHL, can't be worse than the zero line some years ago.

Good news. Give him a bounceback against an easier opponent and let Lack play the next 1-2 games.
- FLflames34

Janitor opens the scoring tonight. Bring him up FFS !

- Pres.cup

Janitor opens the scoring tonight. Bring him up FFS !
- tincup

He’s not ready!

He’s not ready!
- Clyde334

(frank). WaaaaY more ready than that little poop Yamamoto.

(frank). WaaaaY more ready than that little poop Yamamoto.
- Larsson_fan

I love you dude!!

Wtf was Backlund doing? He better be buying Smith dinner!

hey so Freddie and Glass were in tonight

they sat Stajan and Ferland?
Any news on them or was it just time to try something new?

Maybe Ferland needs a wake up call, he has been pretty ineffective so far

hey so Freddie and Glass were in tonight

they sat Stajan and Ferland?
Any news on them or was it just time to try something new?

Maybe Ferland needs a wake up call, he has been pretty ineffective so far
- cpltanto

They just wanted to see if Tchuck could keep his head from being caved in if Ferland wasn't around to protect him.... turns out he couldn't.

They just wanted to see if Tchuck could keep his head from being caved in if Ferland wasn't around to protect him.... turns out he couldn't.
- Pres.cup

Well, Gudbranson is good a face punching anyway. I guess that along with the goal he scored last year makes the trade a win.

Well, Gudbranson is good a face punching anyway. I guess that along with the goal he scored last year makes the trade a win.
- tincup

When you just want a high draft pick and to protect the kids... yes.

Speaking of draft picks, welcome to the canucks world, era of 09-12 ... where you trade them all away and don't win a cup

When you just want a high draft pick and to protect the kids... yes.

Speaking of draft picks, welcome to the canucks world, era of 09-12 ... where you trade them all away and don't win a cup
- Pres.cup

Bullpoop. The arrogance and pride your fan base exhibited , how your team was above criticism from the laughing stocks of the league ( which, btw, seemed to be fans of anywhere from 15-22 teams).
You loved it. You were sky high. Now you say you would trade back all that time in the sun to get those picks back?

Bullpoop.

When you just want a high draft pick and to protect the kids... yes.

Speaking of draft picks, welcome to the canucks world, era of 09-12 ... where you trade them all away and don't win a cup
- Pres.cup

But if you'd won game 7, it would have all been worth it.