Hayes
- mdw7413

They didn't draft him you ignoramus.

You see Brooks article this morning?
- tomburton99

Nope, I only read his crap if it ends up in here. Guess I need to go look.

3-2 Rangers

Zib, Nash, Kreider

Tarasenko, Schwartz

They didn't draft him you ignoramus.
- JRR1285

I was talking about his future son

You see Brooks article this morning?
- tomburton99

http://nypost.com/2017/10...r-they-already-recruited/

I was talking about his future son
- mdw7413

😂
- tomburton99

I just saw the thumbnail. Guess you are just about fully radicalized at this point?

http://nypost.com/2017/10/09/rangers-ideal-reinforcement-is-center-they-already-recruited/
- airjan23

Thank you Jan.

I was talking about his future son
- mdw7413

Can you imagine how ugly that kid will be? Yikes.

I just saw the thumbnail. Guess you are just about fully radicalized at this point?
- JRR1285

Gonna try to internalize now instead of speak out.

Gonna try to internalize now instead of speak out.
- tomburton99

Larry Brooks is a moron. If it does come to fruition I can't say I hate it, but I don't particularly like it either.

Hilarious scenario would be them acquiring him, you jumping ship to Vegas and the Rangers hoisting the cup.

Can you imagine how ugly that kid will be? Yikes.


- tomburton99

- mdw7413

Looks about the same as Ovi.

You see Brooks article this morning?
- tomburton99

Say what you want about Brooks but this is true, even if its Ruff making the calls on D

If it is Marc Staal with McDonagh, which entails the captain switching to his off-side at the age of 28 after having played the right for only 15 games before this season, then a second pairing of Brady Skjei with Shattenkirk means that Skjei becomes the stay-back guy even though he is at his best and most valuable as a puck-mover capable of joining/leading the rush.

It means the end of the Skjei-Brendan Smith tandem that played so well in the playoffs. And if Skjei-Shattenkirk is the second pair, then Smith becomes a third-pair guy on the first year of a four-year contract worth $4.35 million per? And with whom, Nick Holden on his left or Tony DeAngelo on his right? Or is DeAngelo already marked for the AHL under this type of alignment?

Say what you want about Brooks but this is true, even if its Ruff making the calls on D

If it is Marc Staal with McDonagh, which entails the captain switching to his off-side at the age of 28 after having played the right for only 15 games before this season, then a second pairing of Brady Skjei with Shattenkirk means that Skjei becomes the stay-back guy even though he is at his best and most valuable as a puck-mover capable of joining/leading the rush.

It means the end of the Skjei-Brendan Smith tandem that played so well in the playoffs. And if Skjei-Shattenkirk is the second pair, then Smith becomes a third-pair guy on the first year of a four-year contract worth $4.35 million per? And with whom, Nick Holden on his left or Tony DeAngelo on his right? Or is DeAngelo already marked for the AHL under this type of alignment?
- mrn22

While all that is somewhat true, it was one game, and I don't think those are going to be set pairings.

Looks about the same as Ovi.
- JRR1285

Ovi looks like the giant from Happy Gilmore

Ovi looks like the giant from Happy Gilmore
- mdw7413

Say what you want about Brooks but this is true, even if its Ruff making the calls on D

If it is Marc Staal with McDonagh, which entails the captain switching to his off-side at the age of 28 after having played the right for only 15 games before this season, then a second pairing of Brady Skjei with Shattenkirk means that Skjei becomes the stay-back guy even though he is at his best and most valuable as a puck-mover capable of joining/leading the rush.

It means the end of the Skjei-Brendan Smith tandem that played so well in the playoffs. And if Skjei-Shattenkirk is the second pair, then Smith becomes a third-pair guy on the first year of a four-year contract worth $4.35 million per? And with whom, Nick Holden on his left or Tony DeAngelo on his right? Or is DeAngelo already marked for the AHL under this type of alignment?
- mrn22

Its 3 games in. I wouldn't expect the lines to be 100% solidified and not change for the rest of the year.

Also not sure if anyone considered that smith could be banged up already and be given a rest to heal up.

http://www.espn.com/nhl/s...nrik-lundqvist-cam-talbot


Enjoy.

Its 3 games in. I wouldn't expect the lines to be 100% solidified and not change for the rest of the year.

Also not sure if anyone considered that smith could be banged up already and be given a rest to heal up.
- rangerdanger94

Exactly its three games in let Mcd and Shatty gel!

Its 3 games in. I wouldn't expect the lines to be 100% solidified and not change for the rest of the year.

Also not sure if anyone considered that smith could be banged up already and be given a rest to heal up.
- rangerdanger94

I heard someone say exactly that!

I heard someone say exactly that!
- 21peter

http://www.espn.com/nhl/s...nrik-lundqvist-cam-talbot


Enjoy.
- JRR1285

He could have just deleted the whole thing and just left this sentence. "His contract comes with a no-move clause..."

Chytil doesnt bother me near as much as Kampfer and Holden both playing. Is Ruff/AV's plan to play them this year?
- mrn22

Holden was NYR's best dman for 3/4 of season. Had a rough finish, and much of that could be attributed w/ Staal's shotty play as his partner. Give the guy a chance.

He could have just deleted the whole thing and just left this sentence. "His contract comes with a no-move clause..."
- mdw7413

Pretty much. Really scraping the bottom of the barrel with writers over at ESPN.