Someone in the Toronto thread wants Miller tossed. Unsure why.
- JRR1285

I think he meant from the face off circle on the tying goal

I think he meant from the face off circle on the tying goal
- rangerdanger94

Your Caps winning tonight?

Nope it was poop 1st period by everyone, except Hayes
- mdw7413

Enough with the Hayes love

I think he meant from the face off circle on the tying goal
- rangerdanger94

That makes a lot more sense

For the first time in a long time I expect the Rangers to score every time they have a powerplay

Shat Deuces going bananas

Crazy game, I rarely rant negatively, especially during games but I had to tonight, glad they shut me up here.

OVI 4 goals thus far in game vs. Montreal tonight.

Crazy game, I rarely rant negatively, especially during games but I had to tonight, glad they shut me up here.
- B2B76

All they need to do is find a center to replace Chytill and they will be ok.

Once Chytill was benched Zucc goes wild

OVI 4 goals thus far in game vs. Montreal tonight.
- RangerSaver

7 in 5 periods

Your Caps winning tonight?
- mdw7413

6-1 Caps, and OVI with 4 goals thus far in the game.

Your Caps winning tonight?
- mdw7413

5 goals and only 1 point for Hayes

All they need to do is find a center to replace Chytill and they will be ok.

Once Chytill was benched Zucc goes wild
- TPC

Isn't Miller at center now?

Isn't Miller at center now?
- rangerdanger94

Yes

All they need to do is find a center to replace Chytill and they will be ok.

Once Chytill was benched Zucc goes wild
- TPC

Time to get the guy in my avatar.

All they need to do is find a center to replace Chytill and they will be ok.

Once Chytill was benched Zucc goes wild
- TPC

Whats he doing, or not doing? Im working only half able to pay attention. I never see him on the ice to know what hes doing so bad.

Whats he doing, or not doing? Im working only half able to pay attention. I never see him on the ice to know what hes doing so bad.
- AmazingSav

He didn't touch the ice all 2nd period.

He is burnt toast

He didn't touch the ice all 2nd period.

He is burnt toast
- TPC

He drew a penalty that we scored on in the 2nd

He didn't touch the ice all 2nd period.

He is burnt toast
- TPC

AV doesn't trust him yet I guess. Might as well send him back to Europe and keep Miller as a center

Don't try to think for a second that the same Leafs team in the first period played the same in period two!
That's a worse comment pinning ALL the blame SOLEY on Hank, and none on the defense in key, than that "we could have traded Stepan for Dumba and Coyle before the start of last season" repetitive comment, by you know who.
- RangerSaver

These periods are night and day, crediting Pavalec with far less work is as dumb as killing Hank

He didn't touch the ice all 2nd period.

He is burnt toast
- TPC

Ok but why? You can say he's burnt toast, but how do we know if he doesnt play. Has he been that bad?

Crazy game, I rarely rant negatively, especially during games but I had to tonight, glad they shut me up here.
- B2B76

I rarely do either, and never against you in a mild way as a 40 year goalie and coach as well for a lesser period. I'm sorry buddy if it appeared that way. I just felt that not only you, but others also were solely mentioning Hank as the culprit in the first period. Pavelec had a 11 for 11 second period. But that was light years from the pressure and quality of close in shot attempts and deflected shots that Hank had faced, due to the Rangers pressuring the Leafs defense much more, which is far from light years from the strength of its team.
The question I had posed earlier was that A.V. should have used his timeout call after that 3rd Leafs goal to try and disrupt the pace, and give his team a mouth fill. At least he gave that mouth fill to them after that first period disaster.

Haven't seen a goalie hung out like Hank was since Roy's last game in Montreal

These periods are night and day, crediting Pavalec with far less work is as dumb as killing Hank
- KreiderBomb

You're RIGHT ON 100% Kreidebomb!

I rarely do either, and never against you in a mild way as a 40 year goalie and coach as well for a lesser period. I'm sorry buddy if it appeared that way. I just felt that not only you, but others also were solely mentioning Hank as the culprit in the first period. Pavelec had a 11 for 11 second period. But that was light years from the pressure and quality of close in shot attempts and deflected shots that Hank had faced, due to the Rangers pressuring the Leafs defense much more, which is far from light years from the strength of its team.
The question I had posed earlier was that A.V. should have used his timeout call after that 3rd Leafs goal to try and disrupt the pace, and give his team a mouth fill. At least he gave that mouth fill to them after that first period disaster.
- RangerSaver

back to the small bricks, Saver...