Last year, Raanta had 16 wins, while Hank had probably the worst year of his career. Why does Pavelec have to have 20-25?
And with the competitor Hank is, don't count out the idea of him having one of his best. Especially with an improved D.
- Tonybere
You did not read & comprehend properly what I had mentioned.
I said the Rangers are relying on Pavelec TO PLAY in 20 to 25 games with success, (i.e., MORE THAN UNSUCCESSFULLY, Tony), so Hank will be fresher at a then age 36 for a possible long playoff run. I NEVER SAID "Pavelec has to have 20 to 25" wins, like you insinuated here. But he must win about 60% of those starts (a 12 to 15 wins ratio), for the Rangers to make the postseason in the tough Eastern Conference, especially with the MAJORITY of them being against WEAKER teams. Raanta's very well play & 16 wins were only just good enough to reach the 2nd & last, East Wild Card spot, despite 102 points earned.
At 35 going on 36, it's physically impossible for Hank to practice nearly daily in Hank like style to remain sharp & fit, plus play a Hank like style wise game for 70 or more regular season games, PLUS last through an extended playoff run. Also, how many playoff series since the days of Torts have the Rangers swept with deeper rosters & a YOUNGER Hank, or won in just 5 games only?
But Hank must improve his play as well, despite how better OVERALL the defense appears with Smith here from game one, along with Shatty offensively in promoting more offensive zone puck control, and lesser defensive zone strain. However, after the top four core, Staal, Deangelo, Holden (if still here, holding up well for a full season this time), &/or a top prospect (likely Pionk or Bereglazov), are all only a big hope right now, until hopefully proven positive so later.
been drinking? 
