Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks add UFA Thomas Vanek to crowded forward ranks
Author Message
storm88
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Surrey, BC
Joined: 09.29.2011

Sep 3 @ 7:23 PM ET
Then let's keep our fingers crossed and hope we can get back what we gave up for EG.
- Kaynine


Rasmus Asplund was picked by Buffalo with what would have been our 2nd rd pick (via EG-McCann trade). Buffalo got the pick from Florida in the Pysyk deal. As much as I like EG, I think he is more valuable in the room than on the ice. If he is moved, JB better hit a home run. Going to be such and interesting year.
Danny Bomber
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.01.2017

Sep 3 @ 7:56 PM ET
I'm going to come out of hiding.

Isn't this what we wanted?

1- Sign players that can be moved at the TDL for more picks and or prospects
2- Let the kids "bake" in Utica.

There will be injuries thats for sure. Players like Goldobin and Virtanen may not play 82, but they'll get their games.

This works for me. The Canucks won't make the playoffs. Another bottom 5 pick would be welcoming and that is likely what we will get.

- storm88

I thought this was exactly what most wanted.
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Sep 3 @ 8:13 PM ET
I thought this was exactly what most wanted.
- Danny Bomber


Their is no we in HB.

via GIPHY

thundachunk
Location: Help
Joined: 12.31.2011

Sep 3 @ 8:19 PM ET
brother, we still suck. No worries
- CanuckDon

I doubt it. I bet we are a bubble team if this roster has chemistry. On paper we are looking a ton better than Vegas, Detoilet, Colorado, Arizona, Carolina and New jersey. So in a way Vantel is right we are in a good spot to get a good many more wins that would set us picking at 10-15 that is not ideal for a rebuild.

Linden said "rebuild" to appease, nothing has changed on what they are doing that is why he and many are pi$$ed off. Smoke and mirrors.
thundachunk
Location: Help
Joined: 12.31.2011

Sep 3 @ 8:19 PM ET
Their is no we in HB.

via GIPHY


- dbot

There. For Lefty.
Danny Bomber
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.01.2017

Sep 3 @ 8:23 PM ET
Their is no we in HB.

via GIPHY


- dbot

Did I say 'we' ?
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Sep 3 @ 8:24 PM ET
I doubt it. I bet we are a bubble team if this roster has chemistry. On paper we are looking a ton better than Vegas, Detoilet, Colorado, Arizona, Carolina and New jersey. So in a way Vantel is right we are in a good spot to get a good many more wins that would set us picking at 10-15 that is not ideal for a rebuild.

Linden said "rebuild" to appease, nothing has changed on what they are doing that is why he and many are pi$$ed off. Smoke and mirrors.

- thundachunk

You are way too optimistic. We SUCK. Top 5 pick for sure.
Crazybagoham
Joined: 06.27.2014

Sep 3 @ 8:25 PM ET
I like the Vanek pickup, 1 year deal so we can flip him/no risk. We have so few right handed wingers in the system I think he might end up in the top 6 if Boeser needs more time in Utica. Vanek is heavier than I thought, I'm glad we aren't one of the teams that actually gave up assets for this guy though.

Dank Hank Granlund
LE Bo Vanek
Bartschi Sutter Gagner
Dorsett Chaput Virtanen

How I see the forward lines going, I'm sure it won't be exactly like that, but those are the players I think will get the spots, with Gaunce/Boucher/Goldy/burmistrov as depth guys
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Sep 3 @ 8:26 PM ET
Did I say 'we' ?
- Danny Bomber

phyllee
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 06.24.2014

Sep 3 @ 8:26 PM ET
It's Linden and his whole "we owe the Sedins to try and be competitive" thing. As much as people assume Aquilini is pushing for this, It's starting to look more and more like it's Linden's personal relationship with 2 players on the team that's really steering the ship. Not to excuse Benning of all blame since his execution of this bad plan could've been way better but the hiring of Linden as president set this team back a few years.
- Nucker101


I honestly think Sedins are gone at the deadline. They talk like they want to stay Canucks but seriously who wouldnt want to try for a cup. My top guesses on where they do 1.Nashville (strong contender) 2.Ottawa (Burrows) 3.Tampa Bay (Hedman) and if they make it 4.NYR.

Also if Gudbranson doesnt sign by deadline hopefully hes gone, or canucks lose him for nothing
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Sep 3 @ 8:27 PM ET
I honestly think Sedins are gone at the deadline. They talk like they want to stay Canucks but seriously who wouldnt want to try for a cup. My top guesses on where they do 1.Nashville (strong contender) 2.Ottawa (Burrows) 3.Tampa Bay (Hedman) and if they make it 4.NYR.

Also if Gudbranson doesnt sign by deadline hopefully hes gone, or canucks lose him for nothing

- phyllee

phyllee
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 06.24.2014

Sep 3 @ 8:28 PM ET
You are way too optimistic. We SUCK. Top 5 pick for sure.
- CanuckDon


Miss Dahlin but still either get Merkley or Boqvist. Would be a dream to get 2/3 of these guys
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Sep 3 @ 8:28 PM ET
I like the Vanek pickup, 1 year deal so we can flip him/no risk. We have so few right handed wingers in the system I think he might end up in the top 6 if Boeser needs more time in Utica. Vanek is heavier than I thought, I'm glad we aren't one of the teams that actually gave up assets for this guy though.

Dank Hank Granlund
LE Bo Vanek
Bartschi Sutter Gagner
Dorsett Chaput Virtanen

How I see the forward lines going, I'm sure it won't be exactly like that, but those are the players I think will get the spots, with Gaunce/Boucher/Goldy/burmistrov as depth guys

- Crazybagoham



No prospects . Nice rebuild

Chaput over Boeser
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Sep 3 @ 8:29 PM ET
I honestly think Sedins are gone at the deadline. They talk like they want to stay Canucks but seriously who wouldnt want to try for a cup. My top guesses on where they do 1.Nashville (strong contender) 2.Ottawa (Burrows) 3.Tampa Bay (Hedman) and if they make it 4.NYR.

Also if Gudbranson doesnt sign by deadline hopefully hes gone, or canucks lose him for nothing

- phyllee

Crazybagoham
Joined: 06.27.2014

Sep 3 @ 8:29 PM ET
No prospects . Nice rebuild
- VANTEL



what prospects?
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Sep 3 @ 8:30 PM ET
I honestly think Sedins are gone at the deadline. They talk like they want to stay Canucks but seriously who wouldnt want to try for a cup. My top guesses on where they do 1.Nashville (strong contender) 2.Ottawa (Burrows) 3.Tampa Bay (Hedman) and if they make it 4.NYR.

Also if Gudbranson doesnt sign by deadline hopefully hes gone, or canucks lose him for nothing

- phyllee

Dude. You are a good guy, but this is one flag that's warranted
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Sep 3 @ 8:30 PM ET
what prospects?
- Crazybagoham


Boeser
Crazybagoham
Joined: 06.27.2014

Sep 3 @ 8:31 PM ET
No prospects . Nice rebuild
- VANTEL



what prospects?

and someone has to play 4c.... hence his new contract. Read the post, I said "if Boeser needs time in Utica -.-
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Sep 3 @ 8:31 PM ET
Dude. You are a good guy, but this is one flag that's warranted
- CanuckDon

Crazybagoham
Joined: 06.27.2014

Sep 3 @ 8:32 PM ET
Boeser
- VANTEL


read my post fully before ruining your panties
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Sep 3 @ 8:32 PM ET
what prospects?

and someone has to play 4c.... hence his new contract. Read the post, I said "if Boeser needs time in Utica -.-

- Crazybagoham


The roster you posted I would not watch one game
Crazybagoham
Joined: 06.27.2014

Sep 3 @ 8:33 PM ET
The roster you posted I would not watch one game
- VANTEL


I'm sure the several bottom line players you swap out will really make a difference
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Sep 3 @ 8:34 PM ET
read my post fully before ruining your panties
- Crazybagoham



Chapoo will not make this team Boeser will
thundachunk
Location: Help
Joined: 12.31.2011

Sep 3 @ 8:35 PM ET
You are way too optimistic. We SUCK. Top 5 pick for sure.
- CanuckDon
I might be optimistic but this team isn't horrible on paper. If they have chemistry things could go well. I like to win. Players are in to win.

Sure we could suck but we could also not suck.
thundachunk
Location: Help
Joined: 12.31.2011

Sep 3 @ 8:37 PM ET
Chapoo will not make this team Boeser will
- VANTEL

You're right.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29  Next