walshyleafsfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita Joined: 07.14.2011
|
|
|
50 games u don't get last year either.
When u have a top 2 minute muncher facing the best in the tough minutes ok
His offence is crap but offense is the last thing the Leafs need.
Just curious....
Who out there is available or could be pried away at what cost? - Nighthawk
Not many out there, you are correct. However, just because supply is limited, doesn't mean you made a trade for the sake if making a trade. Lou's alluded to this many times. You don't trade for a guy who can only give you 50 or 60 games a year. You need a guy, if you're trading for a perceived top pairing dman, to play on the top pair 82 + games a year.
I think they'll see how Dermott, Lillybust, Rosen and Borgman are at come camp time.
A trade for Tanev could've easily happened by now. Nothing standing in the way. I don't think management is looking at Chris as a solution |
|
ClarksonDavid
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Rielly wouldn't, crack top 4 on the sens team -PtotheY, SK Joined: 03.15.2014
|
|
|
Way overpay - no deal. Marchenko, Timoshov a fifth and a turd for Tanev and he can be the 7th d and keep the mascot company. - winsix
Tanev easily becomes leafs best d on the right side and third best dman. Doubt it would happen though |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Not many out there, you are correct. However, just because supply is limited, doesn't mean you made a trade for the sake if making a trade. Lou's alluded to this many times. You don't trade for a guy who can only give you 50 or 60 games a year. You need a guy, if you're trading for a perceived top pairing dman, to play on the top pair 82 + games a year.
I think they'll see how Dermott, Lillybust, Rosen and Borgman are at come camp time.
A trade for Tanev could've easily happened by now. Nothing standing in the way. I don't think management is looking at Chris as a solution - walshyleafsfan
No arguments here. As for prospects none r projected as top 2.
As for the TOTAL solution no but like u say supply is limited & that never changes either.
It is in the right direction though but i don't see a deal there.
LL will keep trying cuz not much choice IMO.
Its the most difficult trades to make. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Tanev easily becomes leafs best d on the right side and third best dman. Doubt it would happen though - ClarksonDavid
Thats about right but it helps Reilly out a ton is what counts.
Develop that other top 4 D in the system & groom Liljegrin.
That IMO would make sense then LL has the cap to deal with soon on ELC's. |
|
winsix
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Henry Hudson's Fairchild 24 South Porcupine Joined: 04.03.2016
|
|
|
Come on back when u can be taken seriously. I'll be here when u do so.
Suggest u don't quit your day job cuz comedy won't pay your bills. - Nighthawk
Keep trying to sell Tanev, no sale here. Come back with something that we need not a ten point a year guy that has never played a full season in the NHL. Would love to make a decent trade for a d-man. Unfortunately Vancouver does not have any currently. |
|
winsix
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Henry Hudson's Fairchild 24 South Porcupine Joined: 04.03.2016
|
|
|
Tanev easily becomes leafs best d on the right side and third best dman. Doubt it would happen though - ClarksonDavid
Injuries and being injury prone is a serious consideration when talking about a players' value. Lupul was a very talented player with solid skill. Unfortunately, he was a walking injury. Tanev has never in seven years in the NHL played a full season. Pretty convincing evidence - to depend on such a player would be a giant folly.
|
|
walshyleafsfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita Joined: 07.14.2011
|
|
|
No arguments here. As for prospects none r projected as top 2.
As for the TOTAL solution no but like u say supply is limited & that never changes either.
It is in the right direction though but i don't see a deal there.
LL will keep trying cuz not much choice IMO.
Its the most difficult trades to make. - Nighthawk
I agree. I think it's best for now to play until the deadline as is, and if we're in a position where it looks like we can win a round or two, pick up some rental dmen. Nothing fancy, just your usual deadline fodder.
Continue to be patient and wait for situations to change. A day before the Schenn for JVR trade, no one would've said it was possible. But, for some reason, Philly soured on JVR and there you go. Gotta think Anaheim would like more scoring at some point. Can't keep going with 2 or 3 forwards every playoffs |
|
Santo_44
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Joined: 10.20.2014
|
|
|
Injuries and being injury prone is a serious consideration when talking about a players' value. Lupul was a very talented player with solid skill. Unfortunately, he was a walking injury. Tanev has never in seven years in the NHL played a full season. Pretty convincing evidence - to depend on such a player would be a giant folly. - winsix
(frank) Tanev...with Bennings asking price no team will get him |
|
Santo_44
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Joined: 10.20.2014
|
|
|
I agree. I think it's best for now to play until the deadline as is, and if we're in a position where it looks like we can win a round or two, pick up some rental dmen. Nothing fancy, just your usual deadline fodder.
Continue to be patient and wait for situations to change. A day before the Schenn for JVR trade, no one would've said it was possible. But, for some reason, Philly soured on JVR and there you go. Gotta think Anaheim would like more scoring at some point. Can't keep going with 2 or 3 forwards every playoffs - walshyleafsfan
I don't like going into the year with both JVR/Bozak
I don't want to lose them for nothing. I can't see either dealt at the deadline. |
|
winsix
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Henry Hudson's Fairchild 24 South Porcupine Joined: 04.03.2016
|
|
|
(frank) Tanev...with Bennings asking price no team will get him - Santo_44
Exactly and when Benning calls Lou to talk a deal, Lou can ask : " can I speak with your boss?" |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I agree. I think it's best for now to play until the deadline as is, and if we're in a position where it looks like we can win a round or two, pick up some rental dmen. Nothing fancy, just your usual deadline fodder.
Continue to be patient and wait for situations to change. A day before the Schenn for JVR trade, no one would've said it was possible. But, for some reason, Philly soured on JVR and there you go. Gotta think Anaheim would like more scoring at some point. Can't keep going with 2 or 3 forwards every playoffs - walshyleafsfan
Thats a good route to take with todays market & cap.
|
|
walshyleafsfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita Joined: 07.14.2011
|
|
|
I don't like going into the year with both JVR/Bozak
I don't want to lose them for nothing. I can't see either dealt at the deadline. - Santo_44
I think it's possible Bozak gets an extension. Dunno about JVR. I think he's definitely a guy they'll look to trade during the year. If they allow JVR to talk about an extension with the other team before trading him, it might suit both parties. |
|
winsix
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Henry Hudson's Fairchild 24 South Porcupine Joined: 04.03.2016
|
|
|
I don't like going into the year with both JVR/Bozak
I don't want to lose them for nothing. I can't see either dealt at the deadline. - Santo_44
It really will depend on the situation. The Leafs may trade them for an area of need rather than prospects or keep them for a playoff run if that is the situation. There will be deals before camp almost certainly. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
(frank) Tanev...with Bennings asking price no team will get him - Santo_44
Most likely true but then again he is not being shopped. |
|
MR.Hunter
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.22.2016
|
|
|
This doesnt really mean much though.. - ClarksonDavid
True goals were easier then! |
|
winsix
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Henry Hudson's Fairchild 24 South Porcupine Joined: 04.03.2016
|
|
|
I think it's possible Bozak gets an extension. Dunno about JVR. I think he's definitely a guy they'll look to trade during the year. If they allow JVR to talk about an extension with the other team before trading him, it might suit both parties. - walshyleafsfan
I agree. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
No secret JVR is the most likely asset to trade.
Luv to hear who Winsix thinks he fetches for need? |
|
winsix
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Henry Hudson's Fairchild 24 South Porcupine Joined: 04.03.2016
|
|
|
Tanev easily becomes leafs best d on the right side and third best dman. Doubt it would happen though - ClarksonDavid
Not sure how you rate Tanev higher than Zaitsev - I respectfully disagree.
|
|
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON Joined: 02.28.2011
|
|
|
I don't like going into the year with both JVR/Bozak
I don't want to lose them for nothing. I can't see either dealt at the deadline. - Santo_44
You don't lose them for nothing, you get cap space back. |
|
winsix
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Henry Hudson's Fairchild 24 South Porcupine Joined: 04.03.2016
|
|
|
No secret JVR is the most likely asset to trade.
Luv to hear who Winsix thinks he fetches for need? - Nighthawk
He's a rental at this point, a high scoring left winger, and rentals are hard to move in the offseason because of the cap. Duchene - hasn't moved because even though he has 2 years left, he is also considered a rental. JVR would get a mid range prospect and a 1st rounder at the the deadline, probably in the 20th to 30th pick range maybe a little more.
|
|
winsix
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Henry Hudson's Fairchild 24 South Porcupine Joined: 04.03.2016
|
|
|
You don't lose them for nothing, you get cap space back. - Zezel
Not great shakes with JVR, a 29 goal and 62 point LW that is a $4.25 Mil cap hit was great while it lasted.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
It really will depend on the situation. The Leafs may trade them for an area of need rather than prospects or keep them for a playoff run if that is the situation. There will be deals before camp almost certainly. - winsix
1st u post this...
He's a rental at this point, a high scoring left winger, and rentals are hard to move in the offseason because of the cap. Duchene - hasn't moved because even though he has 2 years left, he is also considered a rental. JVR would get a mid range prospect and a 1st rounder at the the deadline, probably in the 20th to 30th pick range maybe a little more. - winsix
Then this...
So is it need or picks/prospects?
U do like to dance but going off on tangents also. |
|
winsix
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Henry Hudson's Fairchild 24 South Porcupine Joined: 04.03.2016
|
|
|
1st u post this...
Then this...
So is it need or picks/prospects?
U do like to dance but going off on tangents also. - Nighthawk
I think Leafs would trade JVR, but the area of need is a d-man and he would not be enough to get a player like Manson for example. You asked what his value was, and I gave an honest answer. Area of need is a RHD. To get Manson it would be more like JVR, a very good prospect and a pick probably. My thinking on JVR is that he is of more value if the Leafs were to sign him to a 4 or 5 year deal - if at all possible and then trade him. His value increases significantly. As was suggested earlier by Walshy - trading and letting the other team negotiate a contract might also increase his value.
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I think Leafs would trade JVR, but the area of need is a d-man and he would not be enough to get a player like Manson for example. You asked what his value was, and I gave an honest answer. Area of need is a RHD. To get Manson it would be more like JVR, a very good prospect and a pick probably. My thinking on JVR is that he is of more value if the Leafs were to sign him to a 4 or 5 year deal - if at all possible and then trade him. His value increases significantly. As was suggested earlier by Walshy - trading and letting the other team negotiate a contract might also increase his value. - winsix
Ok gotcha its Manson.
A RHD is the top need & Tanev i see no deal there tbh.
Personally the Ducks r not positioned to move him til D is healthy.
IMO the Preds r a better team to trade with.
That said Poile is stingy when moving D.
|
|
MR.Hunter
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.22.2016
|
|
|
No secret JVR is the most likely asset to trade.
Luv to hear who Winsix thinks he fetches for need? - Nighthawk
Horvat, Boeser, and 5 1sts |
|