Why give up a kings ransom in assets when we can just sign Shatty?
- rangerdanger94
I have been proposing for that all along, using the words, "free of giving up any assets". But a few here are against the move, due to the $7 years at $6M per year rumored that he will demand, in feeling that the contract would be Girardi or Staal like, hurting us in 3 years. To that I have also stated that if he so badly wanted to play for his one time rooting interest where he was raised, then the Rangers could at least try & start at 4 or 5 years for slightly less money, provided that there would be no bidding war for him. But I began stating that prior to both Girardi's buyout and the Stepan trade. So now there is even more available cap space to first re-sign Smith, followed then with Shatty, if Trouba is indeed out of the picture.
The #1 critic of Shatty doesn't like him because of his weak defensive game. I don't see any Bobby Orr equivalents available to satisfy that same #1 Stepan hater, who is celebrating his departure in LA LA LAND tonight, likely while preparing for who to be his next whipping boy will be here, if it's not the +17 career regular season rated Shatty. I suppose he would rather instead trade for Justin Faulk's -83 rating, and give up either Zucc or Miller as per their demand for a top forward, in doing so. It won't be Dumba, if rumors again tonight have the Wild trading either Brodin (to BOS. or MTL., possibly for Galcheynuk), & if not, try to move Scandella by the weekend's end.