Posted this in the rumor thread but I should have put it here:
sure, if you ignore the fact that claessen was better in literally EVERY tracked stat (other than hits and BS, largely based on games played) and his minutes were not sheltered at all (DZFO% was almost identical to methot's)....then yes, it's not close.
i mean who needs things like points and possession out of a top pairing dman when you can have INTANGIBLES.....
- sensarmy_11
Methot averaged 20 mins/game.
Claesson averaged 13 mins per game this season....the lowest of any Senator Dman (including Boro, Wideman and Ben Harpur). He was also not trusted on the pk, averaging a whopping 25secs per game.
But noooo..he didn't play sheltered mins!
Give your head a shake man.
It's one thing to claim that losing Methot isn't a huge deal. I can at least entertain that discussion. But to try to convince people that Freddy freaking Claesson, who averaged 13 mins a game, is the answer to fix the giant hole left in our top 4 is absolutely ridiculous.
I am not trying to rip Claesson. I like the kid and it's definitely possible the guy becomes a great Dman, but right now, he is nothing more than a prospect who has played sheltered mins for half a season. It's absolutely crazy to think some people in this fanbase think he is more valuable to this team's playoff success over the next few years than Methot.