Dallas is looking for D as well, that's why people have suggested Tanev + for the 3rd pick and keep our 5th pick
- NorthNuck

Tanev and Van's 2nd might get a 3OA. As seen by Sergachev and a 2nd for Drouin.

Just to be clear, the trade was.....

Tanev and 5ov
For
3ov, 29ov and an A prospect (d1ckson)
- Pres.cup

If this was the trade, I would be fine with it. Dont love the 29th pick, wish it was a bit higher, but a first round pick and a prospect is enough for me to move on from Tanev

Just to be clear, the trade was.....

Tanev and 5ov
For
3ov, 29ov and an A prospect (d1ckson)
- Pres.cup

So who would VAN take 3OA in this scenario?

So who would VAN take 3OA in this scenario?
- As_I_See_It

same player they could probably get a 5OA

Just to be clear, the trade was.....

Tanev and 5ov
For
3ov, 29ov and an A prospect (d1ckson)
- Pres.cup

that's good value for the nucks. benning should be all over that.

There were other ridiculous trade scenarios that didn't involve VAN's 5OA. Just look at some of the garbage Dragon was pitching. Totally out to lunch. That's what I was referring to.

What you have posted above is actually somewhat reasonable.
- As_I_See_It

Well.... that's your problem... right there...
Im sure you've got your own posters in leaf land that... sometimes... get a little... over zealous

If this was the trade, I would be fine with it. Dont love the 29th pick, wish it was a bit higher, but a first round pick and a prospect is enough for me to move on from Tanev
- WhiteLie

I don't love the idea of using Tanev to move up two spots... If it was to move into the top 2, I'd be more open to it. I don't see a lot of value in moving up from 5 to 3 unless you absolutely LOVE one of the two top ranked defencemen.

Obviously, there are other pieces involved here, but I don't think Dallas would be offering up as much as people think

So who would VAN take 3OA in this scenario?
- As_I_See_It

Nobody... we trade it to Jersey with granlund and 55ov for their first...

I don't love the idea of using Tanev to move up two spots... If it was to move into the top 2, I'd be more open to it. I don't see a lot of value in moving up from 5 to 3 unless you absolutely LOVE one of the two top ranked defencemen.

Obviously, there are other pieces involved here, but I don't think Dallas would be offering up as much as people think
- nucks_94

Agreed, the moving up outside the top 2 spots isnt desired. It gets worse when you realize that 29th pick was straight up for Eaves, and the Dickinson is also a 29th overall pick. Neither of those seem like excellent value, but I am not one who likes to sit/wait out for better deals. VAN has a habit of doing so and it not working out well

Makar is high risk high reward pick.

Something which Benning is against, otherwise he would have picked Keller last year.
- classic321

Benning is a HUGE Makar fan. There is very real chance we take him if he slips past Colorado

Dallas is looking for D as well, that's why people have suggested Tanev + for the 3rd pick and keep our 5th pick
- NorthNuck

the whole Tanev to Dallas for the 3rd was made up by Kuzma. It never had legs.

If this was the trade, I would be fine with it. Dont love the 29th pick, wish it was a bit higher, but a first round pick and a prospect is enough for me to move on from Tanev
- WhiteLie

I just wanted Doan's rights but this is way better

Benning is a HUGE Makar fan. There is very real chance we take him if he slips past Colorado
- CanuckDon

Yeah, I just heard an interview with Benning and he gave a pretty direct comparison to Karlsson

If he honestly believes that Makar could be the next Karlsson, he'll need to trade up to 3rd overall cause Makar won't fall past Colorado

the whole Tanev to Dallas for the 3rd was made up by Kuzma. It never had legs.
- CanuckDon

I'm not saying it's going to happen. But it is a fact they are looking for help on D, and that they are willing to trade the 3OA and it is a fact that JB would move Tanev for a good enough deal.

There were other ridiculous trade scenarios that didn't involve VAN's 5OA. Just look at some of the garbage Dragon was pitching. Totally out to lunch. That's what I was referring to.

What you have posted above is actually somewhat reasonable.
- As_I_See_It

I must have missed the memo...when exactly did someone anoint you as the individual that decides what a person can value a Vancouver player at.

In this draft, in my opinion, Tanev is worth the 3rd overall, I certainly don't need your approval or validation of how I view things, and either doesn't Dragon

I just wanted Doan's rights but this is way better
- CanuckDon

Constantly undervaluing Canuck players...

the whole Tanev to Dallas for the 3rd was made up by Kuzma. It never had legs.
- CanuckDon

I guess Kuzma forgot to run it by Toronto fans for approval.

I guess Kuzma forgot to run it by Toronto fans for approval.
- Makita

Constantly undervaluing Canuck players...
- WhiteLie

I am the poster that said Burrows wasn't worth a bag of pretzels so you may be on to something

I must have missed the memo...when exactly did someone anoint you as the individual that decides what a person can value a Vancouver player at.

In this draft, in my opinion, Tanev is worth the 3rd overall, I certainly don't need your approval or validation of how I view things, and either doesn't Dragon
- Makita

Even if it is fair value, for the same reason TB didn’t trade Drouin for Tanev, Dallas won’t trade the 3OA straight up for tanev.

A straight up trade like that is just terrible in the long-term.

Even if it is fair value, for the same reason TB didn’t trade Drouin for Tanev, Dallas won’t trade the 3OA straight up for tanev.

A straight up trade like that is just terrible in the long-term.
- Tumbleweed

you are correct, but I still don't like you

Even if it is fair value, for the same reason TB didn’t trade Drouin for Tanev, Dallas won’t trade the 3OA straight up for tanev.

A straight up trade like that is just terrible in the long-term.
- Tumbleweed

Maybe, maybe not, in a weak draft with a particular team requiring a shut down defense man, you never know.

Drouin was traded for a very good defense prospect that plays a different style from Tanev, not all D play the same, not all forwards play the same.

Did we pass on Glass and/or Vilardi yet?

you are correct, but I still don't like you
- CanuckDon

Maybe, maybe not, in a weak draft with a particular team requiring a shut down defense man, you never know.

Drouin was traded for a very good defense prospect that plays a different style from Tanev, not all D play the same, not all forwards play the same.
- Makita

to me, if benning is looking to move up, then:

Tanev and 5ov
For
3ov, 29ov and an A prospect

is a really good deal for the nucks.