MR.Hunter
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.22.2016
|
|
|
canucks were disappointed in sliding down to 5oa so Im sure it does matter to them.
Yes dallas wants to deal the pick outright but the bonus here is that dallas would still have a 1st rd pick only losing 2 spaces on the board to 5oa and gets a good prospect. - SMBDragon
Who would you take at three? And if not who do you take at 5? How about Tanev or Edler plus a 2nd or 3rd? For the 14th from Tampa! That way you could draft a center at 5 and maybe get Foote at 14 ?..just spit balling |
|
MR.Hunter
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.22.2016
|
|
|
I know your a leaves fan but ...DUDE , i just gave them the Enforcer and the Cerebral Assassin , 2 top d in the league - onesmallleap
Oh ok |
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
Who would you take at three? And if not who do you take at 5? How about Tanev or Edler plus a 2nd or 3rd? For the 14th from Tampa! That way you could draft a center at 5 and maybe get Foote at 14 ?..just spit balling - MR.Hunter
not bad but i want Petterson and i don't think he goes that late 3 i would go Vilardi , Heiskenan(sp) then at 5 Petterson or Tippett |
|
Nuck4U
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: NY Joined: 10.12.2016
|
|
|
canucks were disappointed in sliding down to 5oa so Im sure it does matter to them.
Yes dallas wants to deal the pick outright but the bonus here is that dallas would still have a 1st rd pick only losing 2 spaces on the board to 5oa and gets a good prospect. - SMBDragon
Yes Nucks hoped they got a better lotto draw. But don't see the gain for them to give up a propect, pick and take on bad contract for 3OA. Who's so superior at 3 that they can't find at 5? They are happy with any of the top C that don't get picked up like Glass and Mittlestadt. But if they are gone then they go D. So don't see motive for trade up on Canucks.
Plus Stars motive isn't to get more futures in trading 3OA. They want a win now deal in an NHL player if they were to deal. |
|
|
|
I would.
But i think that's a stretch.
I think Dallas could do better.
Tanev for Wpg's 8oa seems more realistic, and even then it's unlikely. - dbot
Again I think we are getting caught in the hype of a mediocre draft. Better deals to be had . Get an established top 6 for Tanev |
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
Again I think we are getting caught in the hype of a mediocre draft. Better deals to be had . Get an established top 6 for Tanev - VANTEL
Drouin
|
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Who would you take at three? And if not who do you take at 5? How about Tanev or Edler plus a 2nd or 3rd? For the 14th from Tampa! That way you could draft a center at 5 and maybe get Foote at 14 ?..just spit balling - MR.Hunter
Id have to say mittelstadt. But it could other way too....makar/heiskanen/liljegren w 3oa and glass with 5oa. Depends on what JB values more D or C |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Yes Nucks hoped they got a better lotto draw. But don't see the gain for them to give up a propect, pick and take on bad contract for 3OA. Who's so superior at 3 that they can't find at 5? They are happy with any of the top C that don't get picked up like Glass and Mittlestadt. But if they are gone then they go D. So don't see motive for trade up on Canucks.
Plus Stars motive isn't to get more futures in trading 3OA. They want a win now deal in an NHL player if they were to deal. - Nuck4U
as I said there is possibility that 1oa or 2oa does a surprise pick or leaves 1 of nico or nolan available. Some rankings have had nolan at 5oa after all. with kovalchuck coming back NJ may pick a D? Maybe nucker knows what flyers need |
|
|
|
Drouin
- onesmallleap
Minny are looking at moving Granlund and Neiderrieter . I would look up that alley for some kind of a trade.
They are screwed and up against the cap . Both are RFAs and the expansion draft may force them to make a deal. This is where you look at taking back a bad contract.
Granlund and Pomminville for Hutton |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Drouin
- onesmallleap
wonder what itd take to get it done |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
Again I think we are getting caught in the hype of a mediocre draft. Better deals to be had . Get an established top 6 for Tanev - VANTEL
although the term 'rebuild' has been used, I think the club would still love to make the playoffs. they want to bring back Miller...
part of me thinks, as long as they don't trade for vets and ice an entertaining team, I'm okay with it.
while the other part says it will likely backfire and the club will just miss the playoffs and be unbearable to watch
but hey, we move Tanev for someone with some offense... |
|
Nuck4U
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: NY Joined: 10.12.2016
|
|
|
Again I think we are getting caught in the hype of a mediocre draft. Better deals to be had . Get an established top 6 for Tanev - VANTEL
Sure as long as that doesn't involve giving up draft picks and prospects.
Plus there are a lot of teams between 3-17 willing to give up their pick for an established NHL player. So other then top pick Tanev. JB should be looking to convince Edler, Sutter and LE to waive. If there is a taker JB can retain salary. Plus take on a Cap dump contract too. |
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
wonder what itd take to get it done - SMBDragon
Edler and Baerschi , and Florida has real country clubs Edler could join
then Tanev to TO for Kapanen and a pick or 2 and lookout world here we come |
|
Nuck4U
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: NY Joined: 10.12.2016
|
|
|
as I said there is possibility that 1oa or 2oa does a surprise pick or leaves 1 of nico or nolan available. Some rankings have had nolan at 5oa after all. with kovalchuck coming back NJ may pick a D? Maybe nucker knows what flyers need - SMBDragon
I saw what you posted earlier. While anything is possible it doesn't seem likely IMO. Devils don't want or need old man Kovi. He's coming back to get traded. They need a long term 1st line center. The lotto win was a huge gift for them. Then even more for of a gift for Flyers. Who have great prospects on D but need offense and Center. So don't see them passing on Nico or Nolan either. The major rankings have been pretty consistent with those two either 1 or 2. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
lol
what a sh*t show |
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
lol
what a sh*t show - VanHockeyGuy
welcome to the machine |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
I saw what you posted earlier. While anything is possible it doesn't seem likely IMO. Devils don't want or need old man Kovi. He's coming back to get traded. They need a long term 1st line center. The lotto win was a huge gift for them. Then even more for of a gift for Flyers. Who have great prospects on D but need offense and Center. So don't see them passing on Nico or Nolan either. The major rankings have been pretty consistent with those two either 1 or 2. - Nuck4U
probably not likely yes, but possible.
Yes the flyers were the true winners of the draft lottery. |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Wow.....busy day taking care of our property. Too much lawn
What's up fellas? |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
PK |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Wow.....busy day taking care of our property. Too much lawn
What's up fellas? - LeftCoaster
go have a burger |
|
onesmallleap
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Be Calm n Swede On, BC Joined: 09.23.2015
|
|
|
^^^somebody does not approve of the hockey talk |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Edler and Baerschi , and Florida has real country clubs Edler could join
then Tanev to TO for Kapanen and a pick or 2 and lookout world here we come - onesmallleap
edler will not waive.
Id like to see sven and drouin playing together as well.
So it'd have to be tanev + ? (perhaps cbj 2nd?) |
|
|
|
Like I said We have the perfect scenario to swoop in and grab an elite center from a team with cap problems and expansion draft problems.
Minny need to take back a protected player ( Hutton ) and get rid of a bad contract for cap space Pomminville . Granlund Glass and Bo would be pretty solid down the middle |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
go have a burger - VanHockeyGuy
Marinated pork tenderloin and a salad for dinner |
|
|
|
Like I said We have the perfect scenario to swoop in and grab an elite center from a team with cap problems and expansion draft problems.
Minny need to take back a protected player ( Hutton ) and get rid of a bad contract for cap space Pomminville . Granlund Glass and Bo would be pretty solid down the middle - VANTEL
I don't think your getting mikeal ....or were you referring to Markus as your 1C ? |
|