So, what's this year's draft look like?

I'd put patches on the market and trade whatever else to acquire a top line centre. I like danault but he is a 3rd line centre idealy
- cburgess

the problem I have with putting Patch on the market is that they can't score goals, and you would trade their only player who can!
I'd rather trade Price for a center. but that's just me.

Nice the dregs show up with their "ifs, buts, candies, and nuts"..

glad to see Emelin and Benn back in their chairs.
let's push this to a 7th game boys and girls.
GHG!
- fidopro

Sorry Charlie.

It depends on the draft year. Hawks got teows at 3rd overall. Habs got Galchenyuk.
- cburgess

yikes!

It depends on the draft year. Hawks got teows at 3rd overall. Habs got Galchenyuk.
- cburgess

Like you said last time we spoke, our development sucks. We rushed Galchenyuk, the kid was better in 2014 vs the rangers than he was in this series. Personally I wanted them to get Forsberg at the time, glad to see I wasn't wrong. And Kopitar over Price back in the day

the problem I have with putting Patch on the market is that they can't score goals, and you would trade their only player who can!
I'd rather trade Price for a center. but that's just me.
- fidopro

I'd have to see the stats, but it seems he cant score in the playoffs. I couldn't give a poop really what he does in the regular season.

ok, the random assault at the blogger wasn't needed.
- cburgess

you read that?

Like you said last time we spoke, our development sucks. We rushed Galchenyuk, the kid was better in 2014 vs the rangers than he was in this series. Personally I wanted them to get Forsberg at the time, glad to see I wasn't wrong. And Kopitar over Price back in the day
- J-P

I agree with the bad development. Habs can't develop a good player to save their lives now.

I'd have to see the stats, but it seems he cant score in the playoffs. I couldn't give a poop really what he does in the regular season.
- cburgess

meh. Kane didn't score either and Hawks are out.
it just seems odd to trade your best scorer when you're looking to improve your offense

you read that?
- Gramps28

I'm bored

you read that?
- Gramps28

yeah, that's one of the good news tonight.
we shouldn't have to skip his posts for a few months.

meh. Kane didn't score either and Hawks are out.
it just seems odd to trade your best scorer when you're looking to improve your offense
- fidopro

Well, you don't trade him for peanuts. You ask for a good player back obviosly. Like go to the NYI and say patches and 2 1st rd picks for taveres.

Well, you don't trade him for peanuts. You ask for a good player back obviosly. Like go to the NYI and say patches and 2 1st rd picks for taveres.
- cburgess

we'll see. MB sure has another big summer ahead of him. if not, it could be his last one as GM of the bleu-blanc-rouge imo

euh, not really no
- fidopro

You still haven't countered my point. Who's going in net if trading Price, but not rebuilding?

Well, you don't trade him for peanuts. You ask for a good player back obviosly. Like go to the NYI and say patches and 2 1st rd picks for taveres.
- cburgess

Or you run upstairs and say, "I'll bring you up a glass of wine and snack for a blow job.

I think you'd get the same answer..

You still haven't countered my point. Who's going in net if trading Price, but not rebuilding?
- apex123

Sign a free agent probably.

You still haven't countered my point. Who's going in net if trading Price, but not rebuilding?
- apex123

oh sorry, I'd give the net to Lindgren, as simple as that. just like Murray in PIT

You still haven't countered my point. Who's going in net if trading Price, but not rebuilding?
- apex123

Crawford is available.

Or you run upstairs and say, "I'll bring you up a glass of wine and snack for a blow job.

I think you'd get the same answer..
- pete26

wait. are you sure that was meant for this site?

wait. are you sure that was meant for this site?
- Gramps28

Sometimes I post in real time

Sign a free agent probably.
- cburgess

also true, nothing easier than to find a goalie.
Habs got Dubnik for peanuts a few years back and let him go.

My point is that with a better team up front, they won't rely as much on the goalie, and they will be much more entertaining to watch.
as for their winning percentage in the playoffs, tell me what the current strategie (of having the best goalie in the world) provided as results? could they do worst?

Sometimes I post in real time
- pete26

you have to keep asking though. you don't want to miss the one night a year the answer could be yes.

also true, nothing easier than to find a goalie.
Habs got Dubnik for peanuts a few years back and let him go.

My point is that with a better team up front, they won't rely as much on the goalie, and they will be much more entertaining to watch.
as for their winning percentage in the playoffs, tell me what the current strategie (of having the best goalie in the world) provided as results? could they do worst?
- fidopro

Price was taking us to the cup, here were are scratching our rear ends and smelling our fingers.

oh sorry, I'd give the net to Lindgren, as simple as that. just like Murray in PIT
- fidopro

As I mentioned in my other post, he has almost no NHL experience and even if he does pan out it'll well outside this teams "cup window".