Proposal from another board. It seems everyone thinks its a good deal.


Sam Reinhart, #6
Chris Tanev, #2

I'm all for this. Replace Reinhart with Nico or Patrick with the #2.
Move Kane Possibly for another D-man.
Sign Antipin

McCabe+ for Landeskog then?
- ImThatGuy

that's a horrible deal


I'd rather pay shat 8 per year and get a leader on the back end than a 20 minute a night player on a team worse than ours for 4.5 per

Proposal from another board. It seems everyone thinks its a good deal.


Sam Reinhart, #6
Chris Tanev, #2

I'm all for this. Replace Reinhart with Nico or Patrick with the #2.
Move Kane Possibly for another D-man.
Sign Antipin

McCabe+ for Landeskog then?
- ImThatGuy

That's 92 points we're losing....and those 92 points were not enough. Lande and Nico/Patrick even going to be able to match that?

Proposal from another board. It seems everyone thinks its a good deal.


Sam Reinhart, #6
Chris Tanev, #2

I'm all for this. Replace Reinhart with Nico or Patrick with the #2.
Move Kane Possibly for another D-man.
Sign Antipin

McCabe+ for Landeskog then?
- ImThatGuy

I really think they need to see what dead weight they can shed before they make a big splash

bogo, moulson, gorges, ennis

get 3 of them off the roster, then go after your d men FA or trade

I would not be shocked if Mccabe is traded if we land Alzner

That's 92 points we're losing....and those 92 points were not enough. Lande and Nico/Patrick even going to be able to match that?
- feetontheair22

IMO, the deals make this team better as a whole.
We lose a little on the front end but gain massive amounts on the back end.
AS the back end improves, so will our front end.

http://www.spotrac.com/nh...ee-agents/defenseman/ufa/

IMO, the deals make this team better as a whole.
We lose a little on the front end but gain massive amounts on the back end.
AS the back end improves, so will our front end.
- ImThatGuy

Its a gamble to be sure...but most of this poop is

IMO, the deals make this team better as a whole.
We lose a little on the front end but gain massive amounts on the back end.
AS the back end improves, so will our front end.
- ImThatGuy

tanev is a 4th d man on a team worse than us


grab russell or quincey and you will get an ok player for nothing


or make a splash and grab alzner or schultz

tanev is a 4th d man on a team worse than us


grab russell or quincey and you will get an ok player for nothing


or make a splash and grab alzner or schultz
- homiedclown

Anyone not wearing 15 or 55 needs to look over there shoulder I was told.

Anyone not wearing 15 or 55 needs to look over there shoulder I was told.
- SABRES 89

I can't imagine Lehner would get moved..

Anyone not wearing 15 or 55 needs to look over there shoulder I was told.
- SABRES 89

agreed, but I am not moving reinhart for the 4th best d man on the nucks

I can't imagine Lehner would get moved..
- feetontheair22

if petersen signs I can see it


stars

agreed, but I am not moving reinhart for the 4th best d man on the nucks
- homiedclown

Jesus Christ not this Tanev talk again

I can't imagine Lehner would get moved..
- feetontheair22

Don't know

Anyone not wearing 15 or 55 needs to look over there shoulder I was told.
- SABRES 89

No it isn't.

Anyone not wearing 15 or 55 needs to look over there shoulder I was told.
- SABRES 89

I wonder what ROR would fetch

I wonder what ROR would fetch
- homiedclown

He surprisingly doesn't have a NMC, at least I don't think

I wonder what ROR would fetch
- homiedclown

I don't think they would move him and his contract would make it hard to move however, he didn't sound to pleased that the Sabres were golfing yet again.

I don't think they would move him and his contract would make it hard to move however, he didn't sound to pleased that the Sabres were golfing yet again.
- SABRES 89

they have a lot of time to play golf

I wonder what ROR would fetch
- homiedclown

Why would you want to trade ROR? I understand his production was not good enough for what he is making, but I would have to think the revolving door on his left wing contributed to that.

Why would you want to trade ROR? I understand his production was not good enough for what he is making, but I would have to think the revolving door on his left wing contributed to that.
- staples

And he's just a really good player, even if the stats weren't great. Oreilly isn't the problem IMO. The fact that Carrier played with ROR and Okposo and got like 5 points is a problem. Get that line a LW

Proposal from another board. It seems everyone thinks its a good deal.


Sam Reinhart, #6
Chris Tanev, #2

I'm all for this. Replace Reinhart with Nico or Patrick with the #2.
Move Kane Possibly for another D-man.
Sign Antipin

McCabe+ for Landeskog then?

Out
McCabe
Reinhart
6OA
Kane
Additional asset for Landy

IN
Landy
Antipin
Tanev
D-man from
- ImThatGuy

Not sure why so many people love Tanev. I wouldn't move Reinhart for Tanev not unless they significantly sweetened the pot.

Anyone not wearing 15 or 55 needs to look over there shoulder I was told.
- SABRES 89

That makes sense to me. I would add ROR and likely Lehner to that list but what do i know.

Why would you want to trade ROR? I understand his production was not good enough for what he is making, but I would have to think the revolving door on his left wing contributed to that.
- staples

I just wondered what he would fetch

Not sure why so many people love Tanev. I wouldn't move Reinhart for Tanev not unless they significantly sweetened the pot.
- SabreWest

tanev is really good in his own end

but does nothing for the transition game