golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
apparently we arent allowed our own views or opinions here
theres a few of us here that had Laine the clear #1 despite the scouts....now theres not many who in hindsight wouldnt take him #1 - SMBDragon
Most would still take him #2. There's really no evidence to the contrary.
Matthews has more points, goals, plays a tougher position. |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
WE pick 5-7. - dbot
we've been screwed for the lotto before, probably due for some luck....I say we get #2 |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
yep its called the sh*t job he's done here. - SMBDragon
With all the great players. |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
or a roofie - golfingsince
oh my.... guess someone has a nasty secret
is it EK? |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Most would still take him #2. There's really no evidence to the contrary.
Matthews has more points, goals, plays a tougher position. - golfingsince
theres been articles in sports pages including tsn that said most GMs now would take laine 1oa.
Many posters here have also commented the same since. Seems the majority |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
With all the great players. - golfingsince
players are not responsible for his deployment issues or questionable love for certain low level players now are they? |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
theres been articles in sports pages including tsn that said most GMs now would take laine 1oa.
Many posters here have also commented the same since. Seems the majority - SMBDragon
You should provide a links for this BS.
Also, what posters here think really has no bearing on the matter. Aside from the fact most were pissed when we didn't take Shinkaruk at 9 overall over Horvat, there's a TO bias.
Matthews is about to lead his team to the playoffs as a rookie. Laine can't even lead his line in scoring. Maybe it's not as clear cut as you suggest, or it's clear cut the other way.
I've been an anti-leaf my entire life, but what you're saying has no factual basis. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
players are not responsible for his deployment issues or questionable love for certain low level players now are they? - SMBDragon
Most of the team is low level players, there's only so much he can do. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
You should provide a links for this BS.
Also, what posters here think really has no bearing on the matter. Aside from the fact most were pissed when we didn't take Shinkaruk at 9 overall over Horvat, there's a TO bias.
Matthews is about to lead his team to the playoffs as a rookie. Laine can't even lead his line in scoring. Maybe it's not as clear cut as you suggest, or it's clear cut the other way.
I've been an anti-leaf my entire life, but what you're saying has no factual basis. - golfingsince
At this point I think the Leafs chose wisely. Great (frank)ing consolation prize |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
At this point I think the Leafs chose wisely. Great (frank)ing consolation prize - CanuckDon
No doubt. However, getting a 1C is about as important a building block as there is. 1D is debatable...... |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
At this point I think the Leafs chose wisely. Great (frank)ing consolation prize - CanuckDon
Agreed. I'll still take Matthews, but both of them are franchise players. |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
You should provide a links for this BS.
Also, what posters here think really has no bearing on the matter. Aside from the fact most were pissed when we didn't take Shinkaruk at 9 overall over Horvat, there's a TO bias.
Matthews is about to lead his team to the playoffs as a rookie. Laine can't even lead his line in scoring. Maybe it's not as clear cut as you suggest, or it's clear cut the other way.
I've been an anti-leaf my entire life, but what you're saying has no factual basis. - golfingsince
really. You have no basis to even make that claim....careful what you say, you may make yourself look really bad |
|
|
|
At this point I think the Leafs chose wisely. Great (frank)ing consolation prize - CanuckDon
I'll take the centre any day. |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Most of the team is low level players, there's only so much he can do. - golfingsince
that still does not mean he should make dumb coaching choices repeatedly now does it?!
If its a crap roster you do your best to try to get better results and look great over achieving. Not screwing up further what is already bad.
|
|
|
|
Anyone have an idea which round Lane Zablocki's projected to go? Grit w/ the clutch gene... |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Anyone have an idea which round Lane Zablocki's projected to go? Grit w/ the clutch gene... - DrChristianTroy
Guessing 3rd-4th round(maybe late 2nd if someone loves him). His start to the playoffs will help his stock for sure. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Agreed. I'll still take Matthews, but both of them are franchise players. - Nucker101
We will get our franchise player in 2018 |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
We will get our franchise player in 2018 - CanuckDon
|
|
|
|
We will get our franchise player in 2018 - CanuckDon
Through UFA |
|
kaptaan
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Turning a new Leaf, CA Joined: 09.29.2010
|
|
|
Worrrd. - DrChristianTroy
I concur. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Through UFA - A_SteamingLombardi
Tavares must be licking his chops to come here...I know I would if I was him |
|
|
|
Guessing 3rd-4th round(maybe late 2nd if someone loves him). His start to the playoffs will help his stock for sure. - Nucker101
We won't be getting him then... Oh well. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Through UFA - A_SteamingLombardi
Through the waiver wire |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
We won't be getting him then... Oh well. - DrChristianTroy
Hard to predict with mid rounders, some guys that are ranked in the 3rd round don't get drafted until the 7th sometimes. |
|
|
|
Through the waiver wire - CanuckDon
45 goal scorer Reid Boucher? |
|