LeftCoaster
|
|
 |
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
|
@7th idk if Liljgren or Mittelstadt will be there to pick.
So I'd pick Necas prolly
- Nighthawk
Some mock drafts have Liligren going top three or four to Jersey or Colorado as they desperately need defence. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
I want one of Mittelstadt, Pettersson, Glass, Necas, Suzuki in the first round.
- DrChristianTroy
My order is Mittelstadt Necas Glass Pettersen & idk much about Suzuki |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I want one of Mittelstadt, Pettersson, Glass, Necas, Suzuki in the first round.
- DrChristianTroy
Problem is there are not many big name D in the second round so you might be commiting to three forwards in the top 60 picks and not paying attention to your D |
|
Flamin_Irishmin
Calgary Flames |
|
Location: Victoria B.C., BC
Joined: 09.15.2015
|
|
|
|
Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why?
- VANTEL
We didn't ask for the monologue of what your wife says when she has sex with you...
Stupid joke I know, but still (real) funny!!!  |
|
|
|
|
|
Some mock drafts have Liligren going top three or four to Jersey or Colorado as they desperately need defence.
- LeftCoaster
I seen him 7 th on the one I look at and they almost nailed it correctly last year. |
|
|
|
|
|
We didn't ask for the monologue of what your wife says when she has sex with you...
Stupid joke I know, but still (real) funny!!!
- Flamin_Irishmin
If you are into grade two humor it sure is |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
I seen him 7 th on the one I look at and they almost nailed it correctly last year.
- VANTEL
Nice. Which link? Thx |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
Problem is there are not many big name D in the second round so you might be commiting to three forwards in the top 60 picks and not paying attention to your D
- VANTEL
We could have something good fall to us in the 2nd & go BPA |
|
LeftCoaster
|
|
|
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
|
I seen him 7 th on the one I look at and they almost nailed it correctly last year.
- VANTEL
Might be an interesting draft where teams go off the board and draft for need with not much confidence in the rankings. |
|
|
|
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
|
If you are into grade two humor it sure is
- VANTEL
 |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
https://www.draftsite.com/nhl/mock-draft/2017/
Most people here don't like it but I do
- VANTEL
I refer to that site also but find many picks in strange places.
Eg Makar 14th & Mittelstadt 16th |
|
|
|
|
|
Might be an interesting draft where teams go off the board and draft for need with not much confidence in the rankings.
- LeftCoaster
I don't think there are any game changers this year at forward. I think there are nice players but second liners. I would rather the skilled Dman and a big forward like Ratcliffe and go after your Center next year with the first overall and 31 st. |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
|
I don't think there are any game changers this year at forward. I think there are nice players but second liners. I would rather the skilled Dman and a big forward like Ratcliffe and go after your Center next year with the first overall and 31 st.
- VANTEL
I don't think there are any 'obvious' game changers but you never know. |
|
|
|
|
|
Problem is there are not many big name D in the second round so you might be commiting to three forwards in the top 60 picks and not paying attention to your D
- VANTEL
I don't subscribe to the idea that you must draft a position you haven't drafted yet... Take the BPA. I like Gadjovich in the 2nd because he works hard & provides a ton of net presence. |
|
LeftCoaster
|
|
|
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
|
I don't think there are any game changers this year at forward. I think there are nice players but second liners. I would rather the skilled Dman and a big forward like Ratcliffe and go after your Center next year with the first overall and 31 st.
- VANTEL
There absolutely will be, just gotta find em. Did you think Brad Marchand would be a "game changer" when he was drafted third round? Or David Krejci, Schwartz, Tarasenko, Kuznetsov? Or Jamie Benn in the fifth round? There's a kid or two out there you've just gotta put the work into finding him and get a bit lucky.
All these mock drafts have Vegas picking third, which is highly highly unlikely with the lottery the way it is now. |
|
|
|
|
|
I refer to that site also but find many picks in strange places.
Eg Makar 14th & Mittelstadt 16th
- Nighthawk
They update regularly . Until they are out to lunch I will follow them |
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think there are any 'obvious' game changers but you never know.
- Marwood
Bang on |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
I don't think there are any game changers this year at forward. I think there are nice players but second liners. I would rather the skilled Dman and a big forward like Ratcliffe and go after your Center next year with the first overall and 31 st.
- VANTEL
Tippett i can see as a 1st line winger.
Patrick, Mittelstadt 1 C's maybe Necas also.
Vilardi, Glass, Pettersen 2 C's
Makar a PP QB
Top 2-3 D Liljgren Foote
Top 4 D Makar, Hague, Valimaki & possibly a handful of others |
|
|
|
|
|
Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why?
- VANTEL
relax, fk |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
I don't subscribe to the idea that you must draft a position you haven't drafted yet... Take the BPA. I like Gadjovich in the 2nd because he works hard & provides a ton of net presence.
- DrChristianTroy
Us picking high in the 1st its need then BPA there after |
|
|
|
|
|
There absolutely will be, just gotta find em. Did you think Brad Marchand would be a "game changer" when he was drafted third round? Or David Krejci, Schwartz, Tarasenko? Or Jamie Benn in the fifth round? There's a kid or two out there you've just gotta put the work into finding him and get a bit lucky.
All these mock drafts have Vegas picking third, which is highly highly unlikely with the lottery the way it is now.
- LeftCoaster
You are right but I was referring more to last year you had a clear cut three . McDavids draft you had a clear cut two.
Don't get me wrong I don't think this is a weak draft , I just think there are no obvious choices . |
|
|
|
|
|
relax, fk
- sxqhfeh
Bite me |
|
|
|
|
|
I don't subscribe to the idea that you must draft a position you haven't drafted yet... Take the BPA. I like Gadjovich in the 2nd because he works hard & provides a ton of net presence.
- DrChristianTroy
He is projected mid 3 rd round |
|
