|
|
|
|
google
- Marwood
The 14th of google |
|
|
|
|
|
They won't break it. I don't see them combining on another 60 goals between this season and next.
- Retinalz
What about after we give them the four year extension? |
|
WhiteLie
Referee
|
|
 |
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087
Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
|
To break a Gretzky record would be something. 
- dbot
They wont break the stupid brother record because of Wayne, but to take that one would be nice |
|
WhiteLie
Referee
|
|
|
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087
Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
|
They won't break it. I don't see them combining on another 60 goals between this season and next.
- Retinalz
I agree that they likely need another season after next to break it. I am not sure they retire after their contract is over though, I could see a 1 or 2 year deal from someone |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
 |
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
|
Are we back on for the lotto pick? 
- VANTEL
Anyone not in the playoffs is considered a lottery team |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
They won't break it. I don't see them combining on another 60 goals between this season and next.
- Retinalz
They r close on to the pace. We will see won't we lol |
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone not in the playoffs is considered a lottery team
- LeftCoaster
 No , really |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
I agree that they likely need another season after next to break it. I am not sure they retire after their contract is over though, I could see a 1 or 2 year deal from someone
- WhiteLie
IMO More likely 1yr deals being in the 35+ group. |
|
Beatle_john
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Corner of Kirk Maclean's Toe and Robert Reichel's face.
Joined: 01.09.2006
|
|
|
|
They wont break the stupid brother record because of Wayne, but to take that one would be nice
- WhiteLie
The only brother combo close to the Sedin's are the Sutters and it took 6 of them... maybe the Espisitos but how do you rank a goalie in the mix?
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMO More likely 1yr deals being in the 35+ group.
- Nighthawk
Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
The only brother combo close to the Sedin's are the Sutters and it took 6 of them... maybe the Espisitos but how do you rank a goalie in the mix?
- Beatle_john
Tony "0" Espisito the Canuck?
I shard the same home rink as him. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why?
- VANTEL
U think they will retire? Thats very possible also. |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
|
No , really
- VANTEL
We're right on track with the Toronto plan, Kadri 7th, Rielly 5th, Nylander 8th, Marner 4th & Matthew's 1st  |
|
|
|
|
|
U think they will retire? Thats very possible also.
- Nighthawk
I don't care if they retire, just don't bring them back here |
|
WhiteLie
Referee
|
|
|
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087
Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
|
The only brother combo close to the Sedin's are the Sutters and it took 6 of them... maybe the Espisitos but how do you rank a goalie in the mix?
- Beatle_john
This list is a bit old (and about scoring families), but they are closing in on the Richards apparently, right now combined they are 4 points shy of 2,000:
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/319574 |
|
WhiteLie
Referee
|
|
|
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087
Joined: 07.26.2010
|
|
|
|
IMO More likely 1yr deals being in the 35+ group.
- Nighthawk
I could see a team giving them security of 2 years if it isnt Vancouver. I think thats what got Naslund to NYR |
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
|
We're right on track with the Toronto plan, Kadri 7th, Rielly 5th, Nylander 8th, Marner 4th & Matthew's 1st
- LeftCoaster
Bo 9th, JV 6th, BB 23rd, OJ 5th, Villardi 6th...next year 1st you're saying?? |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
I could see a team giving them security of 2 years if it isnt Vancouver. I think thats what got Naslund to NYR
- WhiteLie
I don't think they care about security lol |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
|
Bo 9th, JV 6th, BB 23rd, OJ 5th, Villardi 6th...next year 1st you're saying??
- dbot
Sure
They actually picked good players though 
(joking btw...I like all the picks except JV) |
|
|
|
|
|
Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why?
- VANTEL
sedinary....4 more years !!!! 4 more years !!! 4 more years !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
sedinary....4 more years !!!! 4 more years !!! 4 more years !!
- Redmile247
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will assume Canucks will pick 7 th and 37 th in this years draft. Assuming we take a forward and a D who do you take as your forward and Dman?
If you are picking 37 the top Dman around there projected is Brooke. So do you prefer Midlestadt Brooke or Liljegren (or Foote or Makar ) and Ratcliffe ?
I take the higher Dman round one so Liljegren and Rattcliffe would be my choice |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
|
I will assume Canucks will pick 7 th and 37 th in this years draft. Assuming we take a forward and a D who do you take as your forward and Dman?
If you are picking 37 the top Dman around there projected is Brooke. So do you prefer Midlestadt Brooke or Liljegren (or Foote or Makar ) and Ratcliffe ?
I take the higher Dman round one so Liljegren and Rattcliffe would be my choice
- VANTEL
I think we draft third and take Elias Pettersson or Casey Mittelstadt. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
|
I will assume Canucks will pick 7 th and 37 th in this years draft. Assuming we take a forward and a D who do you take as your forward and Dman?
If you are picking 37 the top Dman around there projected is Brooke. So do you prefer Midlestadt Brooke or Liljegren (or Foote or Makar ) and Ratcliffe ?
I take the higher Dman round one so Liljegren and Rattcliffe would be my choice
- VANTEL
@7th idk if Liljgren or Mittelstadt will be there to pick.
So I'd pick Necas prolly |
|
|
|
|
|
I will assume Canucks will pick 7 th and 37 th in this years draft. Assuming we take a forward and a D who do you take as your forward and Dman?
If you are picking 37 the top Dman around there projected is Brooke. So do you prefer Midlestadt Brooke or Liljegren (or Foote or Makar ) and Ratcliffe ?
I take the higher Dman round one so Liljegren and Rattcliffe would be my choice
- VANTEL
I want one of Mittelstadt, Pettersson, Glass, Necas, Suzuki in the first round. |
|
