Good evening.
- pete26

same to you big guy

MIA

Habs Talk
- WaterBoy

I won't hold my breath, but that's what I would like to see for the playoffs

Patch - Danault - Radulov
Lekhonen - Shaw - Chucky
Byron - Plek - Gallagher
- fidopro

Why change the lines as they are now? Just have Radulov take the draws and then go back to the wing. Not a big deal and I would not change the Lehkonen-Danault-Shaw line...

same to you big guy
- mr.peanut

Wud up nut?

Why change the lines as they are now? Just have Radulov take the draws and then go back to the wing. Not a big deal and I would not change the Lehkonen-Danault-Shaw line...
- kev1586

My guess is, so he doesn't have to hold his breath?

My guess is, so he doesn't have to hold his breath?
- pete26

Good call.

Wud up nut?
- pete26

watching l'hockey, you?

Why change the lines as they are now? Just have Radulov take the draws and then go back to the wing. Not a big deal and I would not change the Lehkonen-Danault-Shaw line...
- kev1586

Because Chucky can't play center. it's not only the faceoffs, which he can't win to save his life, it's mostly that he doesn't know what to do in the d zone. he has absolutely no idea what he's doing.
why is it so important to have him play center anyway?!?

My guess is, so he doesn't have to hold his breath?
- pete26

Galchenyuk will be fine on that 1st line.

Because Chucky can't play center. it's not only the faceoffs, which he can't win to save his life, it's mostly that he doesn't know what to do in the d zone. he has absolutely no idea what he's doing.
why is it so important to have him play center anyway?!?
- fidopro

because it allows Daneault to slot in on the 2/3rd line and he's having impact.

watching l'hockey, you?
- mr.peanut

Hanging poop.

Hanging poop.
- pete26

have an alibi

because it allows Daneault to slot in on the 2/3rd line and he's having impact.
- Pie

because he didn't have an impact when playing with Patch and Radulov? right...

Hanging poop.
- pete26

cryptic

because he didn't have an impact when playing with Patch and Radulov? right...
- fidopro

He did, but the rest not so much. This way you can spread it out a bit. 8-2 in their last 10....change it

He did, but the rest not so much. This way you can spread it out a bit. 8-2 in their last 10....change it
- Pie

Patch and Radulov, 2 goals total in their last 6 games with Chucky. keep it

Patch and Radulov, 2 goals total in their last 6 games with Chucky. keep it
- fidopro

now do the rest of the team

now do the rest of the team
- Pie

nah, they're 8-2 in their last 10. they'll be fine

nah, they're 8-2 in their last 10. they'll be fine
- fidopro

You're mad. I apologize for suggesting your lines are simplistic/infantile/reactionary.

nah, they're 8-2 in their last 10. they'll be fine
- fidopro

If I may.

I think what pie is trying to say is by balancing out the scoring, they're a harder team to play against.

I don't disagree..

If I may.

I think what pie is trying to say is by balancing out the scoring, they're a harder team to play against.

I don't disagree..
- pete26

so why put Chucky with Patch and Radulov?!?

so why put Chucky with Patch and Radulov?!?
- fidopro

Because you can put Daneault somewhere else, and if Daneault is the only reason that line clicks then (frank) Pacioretty and Radulov.

so why put Chucky with Patch and Radulov?!?
- fidopro

To balance things out, and it's working.

Not sure what the problem is.

I'm back

To balance things out, and it's working.

Not sure what the problem is.
- pete26

oh! so they balance the scoring by placing their best 3 forwards on the top line, and by playing a kid at center which he obviously cannot do.
got it! my bad Pete