JC was on Tout le monde en parle last week and he proved once again that he's a (frank)ing moron who loves to hear himself talk.
- Not_Yan

#JeSuisJC

That's what I'd do as well.
- BashCH

They can but there's a couple issues with that also

Osti d'imbécile. C'était quand même jouissif de le voir être contredit non-stop par Ciccone et Dubé.
- Not_Yan

C'est dommage, parce qu'une émission de sport en après-midi ça s'écoute bien en travaillant, mais je suis pas capable de l'endurer

They can but there's a couple issues with that also
- obie

Don't think there's a perfect solution for them. Just trying to think of the less bad one.

They could but it would have to be strictly for picks
- obie

No it wouldn't.

They have 46 current contracts, 33 for next year.

They could acquire depth players that Vegas wouldn't pick, or young players/prospects that are exempt from the draft.

C'est dommage, parce qu'une émission de sport en après-midi ça s'écoute bien en travaillant, mais je suis pas capable de l'endurer
- stinger67

J'ecoute en ce moment JC + Rejean Mangeuuuux de maaarde Tremblay...

Don't think there's a perfect solution for them. Just trying to think of the less bad one.
- BashCH

Easy... trade one of their good young D after the season, before the draft for a young player and or picks that don't need protection.

No... It's a reflection of brain capacity
- obie

i've forgotten more than you'll ever know. i swing for the fences while you're still learning to hit off a tee and your arms are too short to box with god.

C'est dommage, parce qu'une émission de sport en après-midi ça s'écoute bien en travaillant, mais je suis pas capable de l'endurer
- stinger67

I like Mike Bossy's capsule.

No it wouldn't.

They have 46 current contracts, 33 for next year.

They could acquire depth players that Vegas wouldn't pick, or young players/prospects that are exempt from the draft.
- BINGO!

Nice...So trade Silverberg for Matt Martin? Yes that's a great solution

They can but there's a couple issues with that also
- obie

Sure, but they're minimal issues compared to the alternative.

It's just asset management and damage control.

Nice...So trade Silverberg for Matt Martin? Yes that's a great solution
- obie

It's a better solution than losing him for nothing, or trading for a player that you have to expose to the draft and would likely be picked...

It's a better solution than losing him for nothing, or trading for a player that you have to expose to the draft and would likely be picked...
- BINGO!

They're not trading Silfverberg or Rackell

Easy... trade one of their good young D after the season, before the draft for a young player and or picks that don't need protection.
- WaterBoy

Anyway D or F, Habs are not getting him...trades are too hard.

Easy... trade one of their good young D after the season, before the draft for a young player and or picks that don't need protection.
- WaterBoy

Either a D or a forward, but yeah.

Only issue is you aren't going to get full value, because other teams will know what you're doing, and a lot of teams won't be able to take on those kinds of contracts.

So you're going to have to bite the bullet and take what you can get, or just lose a guy for nothing.

They're not trading Silfverberg or Rackell
- WaterBoy

I think they will trade Vatanen at some point

They're not trading Silfverberg or Rackell
- WaterBoy

they will send vegas a 2nd and the knights will take cogliano

It's a better solution than losing him for nothing, or trading for a player that you have to expose to the draft and would likely be picked...
- BINGO!

You also need to find a team that can afford to protect Silverberg

They're not trading Silfverberg or Rackell
- WaterBoy

Concept is the same regardless of who they decide to trade, really.

Either a D or a forward, but yeah.

Only issue is you aren't going to get full value, because other teams will know what you're doing, and a lot of teams won't be able to take on those kinds of contracts.

So you're going to have to bite the bullet and take what you can get, or just lose a guy for nothing.
- BINGO!

They will get full value. No cap to deal with and teams will be lining up for some actual talent.

Go back to the Canes trade you (frank)ing redneck

Either a D or a forward, but yeah.

Only issue is you aren't going to get full value, because other teams will know what you're doing, and a lot of teams won't be able to take on those kinds of contracts.

So you're going to have to bite the bullet and take what you can get, or just lose a guy for nothing.
- BINGO!

Exactly and that's why Beaulieu, a 2nd and a 3rd is a pretty good return considering they will get robbed somewhere down the line

I think they will trade Vatanen at some point
- Not_Yan

Really, well that's (frank)ing stupid, you're (frank)ing stupid, I hate you, why don't you think like me?!

*can't argue properly

I think they will trade Vatanen at some point
- Not_Yan

Possible.

I'd take him.

You also need to find a team that can afford to protect Silverberg
- obie

I think the majority of teams who didn't royally (frank) themselves with NTC's and NMC's should be fine there.

Exactly and that's why Beaulieu, a 2nd and a 3rd is a pretty good return considering they will get robbed somewhere down the line
- obie

They aren't getting robbed.


*La nasa a trouvé 7 planète autour d'un soleil avant que Bergevin trouve un centre #1