Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Ryan Wilson: What if HBK was HSK? + Penguins related 30 Thoughts
Author Message
madmike71
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Joined: 12.21.2006

Feb 15 @ 9:43 AM ET
My friend said he saw Friedman say flower maatta would get job done for landeskog... anyone else see this or is this that article from a few days ago
- nh4442


Sign me up for that! Maatta is basically our 6th dman right now. I hate giving up on him, but it's a rare thing to trade a 6th dman for a 1st line winger.
Victoro311
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: San Diego, CA
Joined: 06.17.2014

Feb 15 @ 9:43 AM ET
Kulikov or a guy like him is likely. The only thing I think is certain is adding a 6/7D. Kulikov might have some 4D potential but since he's been hurt he's in a bit of a schultz situation from last year.
- sditulli

Kulikov would be a solid add. I like him a hell of a lot more than I liked Shultz. I hated Schultz and he proved me wrong. I think Kulikov is a bit more than just a bottom pairing defenseman. He would be the kind of stabilizing Lovejoy-like add that we need.
sditulli
Joined: 02.09.2015

Feb 15 @ 9:54 AM ET
Kulikov would be a solid add. I like him a hell of a lot more than I liked Shultz. I hated Schultz and he proved me wrong. I think Kulikov is a bit more than just a bottom pairing defenseman. He would be the kind of stabilizing Lovejoy-like add that we need.
- Victoro311


I felt schultz was a strange add since he needed coached up in a little bit of time. I always thought he had some talent, but as a rental was a tough fit since it was questionable he could contribute last year as a fill-in dman. Now he's likely our long-term third defenseman after likely signing a long-term deal in the next 6 months.
nh4442
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: @MyDaddysInTheAF, PA
Joined: 05.28.2010

Feb 15 @ 10:07 AM ET
That would cripple our defense for a luxury on offense. I get the displeasure towards Maatta the past two years, but we'd have to play Cole in the middle pairing if we did that. Let that sink in.

If we did that trade, Ruth better have a trade in his back pocket for Shattenkirk and a plan to extend him.

- Victoro311

Unless you throw in a high pick to get Barrie too...

But you're right they need a top 4 D. Shat, Barrie, Hamilton...
madmike71
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Joined: 12.21.2006

Feb 15 @ 10:14 AM ET
We would definitely need to add a defenseman.

But no way we can acquire and pay landeskog and shat.

Lovejoy not the fastest guy surprised maatta couldn't find a way to do what lovejoy did and let daley freelance.

The big addition at forward probably won't happen. But it does seem like 1-2 changed on defense are certain next year.

- sditulli



The Penguins don't need Shatty. We have two great RD already. Right now, Schultz and Cole are our 3 and 4 anyway. It's been that way for a while.

I'm convinced the Pens are going to prioritize signing Schultz in the offseason which changes how much money they want to tie up in Maatta. Plus, if they're sold on Schultz, you have to protect him in the expansion draft.
sditulli
Joined: 02.09.2015

Feb 15 @ 10:20 AM ET
The Penguins don't need Shatty. We have two great RD already. Right now, Schultz and Cole are our 3 and 4 anyway. It's been that way for a while.

I'm convinced the Pens are going to prioritize signing Schultz in the offseason which changes how much money they want to tie up in Maatta. Plus, if they're sold on Schultz, you have to protect him in the expansion draft.

- madmike71


That comes pretty close to forcing you to trade Maatta for a forward that you can protect before the expansion draft. I think Maatta has too much trade value to expose.
madmike71
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Joined: 12.21.2006

Feb 15 @ 10:28 AM ET
That comes pretty close to forcing you to trade Maatta for a forward that you can protect before the expansion draft. I think Maatta has too much trade value to expose.
- sditulli


Exactly. I'm skeptical that Colorado would want MAF, but I certainly could see them wanting Maatta.
j.boyd919
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Tampa, FL
Joined: 06.14.2011

Feb 15 @ 10:33 AM ET
My friend said he saw Friedman say flower maatta would get job done for landeskog... anyone else see this or is this that article from a few days ago
- nh4442


Doubtful, and probably not worth it to be honest. Pens don't have someone to step into Maatta's role.
j.boyd919
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Tampa, FL
Joined: 06.14.2011

Feb 15 @ 10:35 AM ET
Hopefully.

The Lovejoy thing was a joke......mostly. People will laugh, but I could see Lovejoy coming back here if Jersey ate some salary. Especially if Maatta goes to Colorado.

Tiops said we're looking at Kulikov. Again....FWIW.

- madmike71


TIOPS can suck it. Kulikov is trash.
j.boyd919
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Tampa, FL
Joined: 06.14.2011

Feb 15 @ 10:38 AM ET
Rather flip Wilson. I like bottom six Rust more than bottom six Wilson. Neither are top 6 forwards.
- Victoro311


I dunno, Wilson hasn't looked out of place when playing with Sid/Geno (120 min combined at 5v5 this season). The production might not be there, but the chances have been. And he looked good with Geno and Horny last night.
j.boyd919
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Tampa, FL
Joined: 06.14.2011

Feb 15 @ 10:40 AM ET
Unless you throw in a high pick to get Barrie too...

But you're right they need a top 4 D. Shat, Barrie, Hamilton...

- nh4442


A "High pick" (20-30th in 1st) is not acquiring Barrie.
nh4442
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: @MyDaddysInTheAF, PA
Joined: 05.28.2010

Feb 15 @ 10:40 AM ET
That comes pretty close to forcing you to trade Maatta for a forward that you can protect before the expansion draft. I think Maatta has too much trade value to expose.
- sditulli

If they would do that trade. Just say flower maatta 1st and Wilson for landeskog Barrie. Come expansion draft you can only have 7F 3D and 1 G right?

Sid
Geno
Landeskog
Kessel
Hagelin
Horn
Guentzal

Letang
Barrie
Dumo

Murray

madmike71
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Joined: 12.21.2006

Feb 15 @ 11:13 AM ET
If they would do that trade. Just say flower maatta 1st and Wilson for landeskog Barrie. Come expansion draft you can only have 7F 3D and 1 G right?

Sid
Geno
Landeskog
Kessel
Hagelin
Horn
Guentzal

Letang
Barrie
Dumo

Murray

- nh4442


We don't need Barrie. He's a luxury. If we trade Maatta we'll need to pick up a solid bottom pairing guy.

buckster2342
Pittsburgh Penguins
Joined: 07.13.2009

Feb 15 @ 11:14 AM ET
If they would do that trade. Just say flower maatta 1st and Wilson for landeskog Barrie. Come expansion draft you can only have 7F 3D and 1 G right?

Sid
Geno
Landeskog
Kessel
Hagelin
Horn
Guentzal

Letang
Barrie
Dumo

Murray

- nh4442

I dont believe guentzel or sheary need to be protected, which would allow us to protect rust or wilson
j.boyd919
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Tampa, FL
Joined: 06.14.2011

Feb 15 @ 11:27 AM ET
We don't need Barrie. He's a luxury. If we trade Maatta we'll need to pick up a solid bottom pairing guy.
- madmike71


Uhhh.. what? Barrie is exactly what the Penguins need. A top 4 Dman with term, locked up in case Schultz walks/regresses.
sditulli
Joined: 02.09.2015

Feb 15 @ 11:33 AM ET
If they would do that trade. Just say flower maatta 1st and Wilson for landeskog Barrie. Come expansion draft you can only have 7F 3D and 1 G right?

Sid
Geno
Landeskog
Kessel
Hagelin
Horn
Guentzal

Letang
Barrie
Dumo

Murray

- nh4442


I don't think flower maatta 1st and wilson is even worth barrie.

And the issue here is the need to protect schultz or figure out how to get lvs not to take him. Or trade maatta for a forward and resign and protect schultz. 4F and 4D protection isn't ideal.

Maata for Duchene could make sense then if colorado is interested (After the season).

We could then protect
Sid
geno
kessel
duchene
hagelin
horn
rust

letang
dumo
schultz

Then need to solve 4D in offseason
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4