http://www.hockeybuzz.com/boards/thread.php?thread_id=136839&page=3

Don't make poop up.
- Feds91Stammer

My bad. You said 4th line "producer", not 3rd (you nailed that one). You also quoted between 7 and 17 points not specifically 10 (you also nailed that one).

What does making a bet over the internet that won't be paid out prove?
- Feds91Stammer

Loser has to post nudes on hockeybuzz

TO TAMPA: Oscar Sundqvist, Eric Fehr and Pouliot
TO PIT: Tyler Johnson

You guys most likely don't know anything about Sundqvist, but you want him.
- Rinosaur

Replace Fehr with a high draft pick.

My bad. You said 4th line "producer", not 3rd (you nailed that one). You also quoted between 7 and 17 points not specifically 10 (you also nailed that one).
- Kucherovski

And he has 2 points in 7 games which is a 23 point pace...

Loser has to post nudes on hockeybuzz
- eichiefs9

I'll do that right now.

And he has 2 points in 7 games which is a 23 point pace...
- Feds91Stammer

You pick and choose anything you want right? He stinks, you were wrong, it's ok you're still next in line for an NHL GM job, don't worry! Hard to be a 4th line "producer" when you're not in the NHL.

TO TAMPA: Oscar Sundqvist, Eric Fehr and Pouliot
TO PIT: Tyler Johnson

You guys most likely don't know anything about Sundqvist, but you want him.
- Rinosaur

Change that Fehr to a 1st and its enticing. They don't want Fehr lol

You pick and choose anything you want right? He stinks, you were wrong, it's ok you're still next in line for an NHL GM job, don't worry! Hard to be a 4th line "producer" when you're not in the NHL.
- Kucherovski

I'm wrong in what way?

You pick and choose anything you want right? He stinks, you were wrong, it's ok you're still next in line for an NHL GM job, don't worry! Hard to be a 4th line "producer" when you're not in the NHL.
- Kucherovski

What was he wrong about? His predictions were accurate as a depth signing and his point production is on par, if he was getting playing time.

EDIT: You know what a depth signing is right?

I'm wrong in what way?
- Feds91Stammer

Wrong that he is a 4th line producer. You did not quote what pace he will be on you quoted 7-17 points. I don't care about his pace, he won't hit 7 NHL points this year playing in the AHL. So you were wrong about him being a 4th line producer and wrong about his 7-17 points.

Wrong that he is a 4th line producer. You did not quote what pace he will be on you quoted 7-17 points. I don't care about his pace, he won't hit 7 NHL points this year playing in the AHL. So you were wrong about him being a 4th line producer and wrong about his 7-17 points.
- Kucherovski

Not really. Most teams 4th liners bounce in and out of the lineup. Especially depth signings. Ignoring things like pace.. and UFA vs. RFA status... and age.. and production.. and reasonable expectations... just further proves your idiocy.

What was he wrong about? His predictions were accurate as a depth signing and his point production is on par, if he was getting playing time.

EDIT: You know what a depth signing is right?
- j.boyd919

I do yes, that also could be argued that it is wrong considering Condra has played more this year, Gabriel Dumont, Bournival. Could be said it was hardly a depth signing for the Lightning. May have been a depth signing for Syracuse but not Tampa.

Not really. Most teams 4th liners bounce in and out of the lineup. Especially depth signings. Ignoring things like pace.. and UFA vs. RFA status... and age.. and production.. and reasonable expectations... just further proves your idiocy.
- j.boyd919

Do you read this stuff first? I don't ignore reasonable expectations, I've actually pointed out it is NOT reasonable to expect 55 out of Johnson while you said yes. I've pointed out Kucherov is on a 3 year pace where he increases his points per game every year so that is reasonable expectation he would get more next year.

They bounce in and out of the lineup? What would you say Pittsburgs 4th line is? Kuntiz, Fehr, Wilson? They aren't bouncing in and out of the lineup all that often. I would say last year the Lightning used Brown, Boyle and Paquette on the 4th line, again didn't bounce in and out all that often. Boyle missed 6 games and Brown missed 5.

Wrong that he is a 4th line producer. You did not quote what pace he will be on you quoted 7-17 points. I don't care about his pace, he won't hit 7 NHL points this year playing in the AHL. So you were wrong about him being a 4th line producer and wrong about his 7-17 points.
- Kucherovski

Yes I was wrong because his pace is better than a 4th line rate.

Change that Fehr to a 1st and its enticing. They don't want Fehr lol
- j.boyd919

Well they'd be losing a center in Johnson and need to replace their 4th line C after he gets bumped up.

Yes I was wrong because his pace is better than a 4th line rate.
- Feds91Stammer

hahah you were wrong because 4th line producers need to be in the NHL. You were wrong because almost all forwards in Syracuse have jumped him as far as "great depth". Peca, Point, Dumont, Bournival. I guess if you meant he is top 10 guys to be called up you were right!!

Do you read this stuff first? I don't ignore reasonable expectations, I've actually pointed out it is NOT reasonable to expect 55 out of Johnson while you said yes. I've pointed out Kucherov is on a 3 year pace where he increases his points per game every year so that is reasonable expectation he would get more next year.

They bounce in and out of the lineup? What would you say Pittsburgs 4th line is? Kuntiz, Fehr, Wilson? They aren't bouncing in and out of the lineup all that often. I would say last year the Lightning used Brown, Boyle and Paquette on the 4th line, again didn't bounce in and out all that often. Boyle missed 6 games and Brown missed 5.
- Kucherovski

Uhh... Kuhnackl, Fehr, and Sestito have all rotated on the 4th line at some point. Especially Kuhn and Fehr.

Well they'd be losing a center in Johnson and need to replace their 4th line C after he gets bumped up.
- Rinosaur

That's what Sundqvist is for. You're not getting Johnson without a 1st.

I do yes, that also could be argued that it is wrong considering Condra has played more this year, Gabriel Dumont, Bournival. Could be said it was hardly a depth signing for the Lightning. May have been a depth signing for Syracuse but not Tampa.
- Kucherovski

Conacher 2 points in 7 games
Bournival 2 points in 17 games
Dumont 1 point in 7 games

hahah you were wrong because 4th line producers need to be in the NHL. You were wrong because almost all forwards in Syracuse have jumped him as far as "great depth". Peca, Point, Dumont, Bournival. I guess if you meant he is top 10 guys to be called up you were right!!
- Kucherovski

Peca 2 points in 9 games

I'll do that right now.
- Feds91Stammer

Uhh... Kuhnackl, Fehr, and Sestito have all rotated on the 4th line at some point. Especially Kuhn and Fehr.
- j.boyd919

Fehr has played 83% of Pittsburghs games, Kuhnackl has played 53% of their games, Conacher has played 14% so his "great depth" is that of well below Kuhnackl.

Peca 2 points in 9 games
- Feds91Stammer

Ok yes cool. Peca more games, Bournival more games, Point more games, next game Dumont will have more games. Seems as though he isn't really high on the depth chart or he would be playing more games than those guys.

I do yes, that also could be argued that it is wrong considering Condra has played more this year, Gabriel Dumont, Bournival. Could be said it was hardly a depth signing for the Lightning. May have been a depth signing for Syracuse but not Tampa.
- Kucherovski

So, just so we're clear here.. a depth signing, is signing a player who may not be a regular in the NHL, but would be ready for the call up if need be and not look out of place and produce in the appropriate role.. right?

So.. the thought process on singing Conacher was probably... he played well here before, and just in case the other guys in Syracuse aren't ready to go... Conacher can fill in so the guys in the AHL can get more ice time than 8 minutes a night. That.. is how GM'S view depth signings.

Ok yes cool. Peca more games, Bournival more games, Point more games, next game Dumont will have more games. Seems as though he isn't really high on the depth chart or he would be playing more games than those guys.
- Kucherovski

Yes clearly Cooper is smart by playing the guys that produce less points.