Arctic_AARDVARK
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Retired, ON Joined: 07.24.2011
|
|
|
from the previous blog..
some people actually think adding Lindholm wouldn't be a significant upgrade for the Leafs D - MaximusAurelius
Donald Trump is President....
Does it really surprise you? |
|
TheMussel
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 09.24.2013
|
|
|
from the previous blog..
some people actually think adding Lindholm wouldn't be a significant upgrade for the Leafs D - MaximusAurelius
People don't get the value of adding a guy like Lindholm.
The effect of adding him is double counted.
1. You remove Martin Marincin, which is an upgrade in itself... to nothing,
2. You add Lindholm, which is an upgrade over nothing. |
|
|
|
Donald Trump is President....
Does it really surprise you? - Arctic_AARDVARK
No he isn't. This is all a huge joke. Ha ha ha.... |
|
Arctic_AARDVARK
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Retired, ON Joined: 07.24.2011
|
|
|
People don't get the value of adding a guy like Lindholm.
The effect of adding him is double counted.
1. You remove Martin Marincin, which is an upgrade in itself... to nothing,
2. You add Lindholm, which is an upgrade over nothing. - TheMussel
You seem to be forgetting one crucial detail..
Lindholm isn't free.. |
|
gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown Joined: 02.19.2009
|
|
|
People don't get the value of adding a guy like Lindholm.
The effect of adding him is double counted.
1. You remove Martin Marincin, which is an upgrade in itself... to nothing,
2. You add Lindholm, which is an upgrade over nothing. - TheMussel
I want the Shat Attack.
Move JVR in off-season, sign Shattenkirk to a 2-year league max deal (we have a poop ton of cap for the next two years until the kids get paid). |
|
Arctic_AARDVARK
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Retired, ON Joined: 07.24.2011
|
|
|
No he isn't. This is all a huge joke. Ha ha ha.... - Steven_Seagull
I wish it were... |
|
|
|
I want the Shat Attack.
Move JVR in off-season, sign Shattenkirk to a 2-year league max deal (we have a poop ton of cap for the next two years until the kids get paid). - gravyface
would you really prefer Shattenkirk over Lindholm?
I understand the UFA free signing - but not looking at what Leafs would need to give up in a trade; would you prefer Shattenkirk or Lindholm? |
|
BetterCallSaul
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Captain Morgan Rielly Joined: 05.07.2013
|
|
|
I wish it were... - Arctic_AARDVARK
I wonder if his speech writers are (frank)ing with him, adding movie quotes in here and there. |
|
BetterCallSaul
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Captain Morgan Rielly Joined: 05.07.2013
|
|
|
would you really prefer Shattenkirk over Lindholm?
I understand the UFA free signing - but not looking at what Leafs would need to give up in a trade; would you prefer Shattenkirk or Lindholm? - MaximusAurelius
Moot, homey. Lindholm will be a Duck for a very long time. Shattenkirk may only be a Blue for a few more weeks. |
|
|
|
Moot, homey. Lindholm will be a Duck for a very long time. Shattenkirk may only be a Blue for a few more weeks. - BetterCallSaul
Ya only way Ducks move him is if someone willing to overpay...Marner gets u Lindholm.. |
|
|
|
Marner for Lindholm - Steven_Seagull
hah.
there's two players on this Leafs team that will not be traded 99.9999% sure.
Marner and Matthews.
I hope we see them on same PP line tonight.
Matthews, Bozak, Marner, Brown and Gardiner on PP1.
Nylander, Uncle Leo, JVR, Kadri and Zaitsev on PP2.
|
|
|
|
Marner for Lindholm - Steven_Seagull
Bump |
|
|
|
Ya only way Ducks move him is if someone willing to overpay...Marner gets u Lindholm.. - Fruitcakenipple
Marner gets you Ekblad+ |
|
|
|
hah.
there's two players on this Leafs team that will not be traded 99.9999% sure.
Marner and Matthews.
I hope we see them on same PP line tonight.
Matthews, Bozak, Marner, Brown and Gardiner on PP1.
Nylander, Uncle Leo, JVR, Kadri and Zaitsev on PP2. - MaximusAurelius
|
|
|
|
Bump - Steven_Seagull
I heard H5N1 is spreading again... |
|
|
|
Marner gets you Ekblad+ - MaximusAurelius
Matthews gets you backstage passes with Jesus and The Apostles live at Heaven. |
|
|
|
Marner gets you Ekblad+ - MaximusAurelius
No he gets u Lindholm if he's the player u want....It's the overpay to get thing.. |
|
|
|
I heard H5N1 is spreading again... - MaximusAurelius
I guess I know who I'm bunking with if I go to Europe |
|
|
|
No he gets u Lindholm if he's the player u want....It's the overpay to get thing.. - Fruitcakenipple
I'm quite sure Willie can get you LIndholm.
I'm looking at players unde 21y in NHL right now.
And it's McDavid, Matthews, Marner, Ekblad who are top4.
Funny how some people still don't realize how good Marner is.
He'll be Datsyuk level. |
|
|
|
I'm quite sure Willie can get you LIndholm.
I'm looking at players unde 21y in NHL right now.
And it's McDavid, Matthews, Marner, Ekblad who are top4.
Funny how some people still don't realize how good Marner is.
He'll be Datsyuk level. - MaximusAurelius
Really?..If i'm Ducks GM and Leafs are calling i want overpay...Marner..Ducks not forced to trade .. |
|
|
|
Really?..If i'm Ducks GM and Leafs are calling i want overpay...Marner..Ducks not forced to trade .. - Fruitcakenipple
I'm quite sure Ducks need to do something on D in order to not lose one of their D-men in the expansion draft.
Don't think they'll be able to trade Bieksa at trade deadline, so Vatanen / Fowler or Lindholm could be traded. |
|
BetterCallSaul
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Captain Morgan Rielly Joined: 05.07.2013
|
|
|
Really?..If i'm Ducks GM and Leafs are calling i want overpay...Marner..Ducks not forced to trade .. - Fruitcakenipple
I don't think Anaheim would make that deal either. They have Lindholm as their 1LD and either Fowler or Theodore as their 2LD. Keep one of those two and trade the other. |
|
Santo_44
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Joined: 10.20.2014
|
|
|
They'll get some nice players on D and in good players in goal (Gruhbauer would be my guess for starting goalie). Forwards meh. - MaximusAurelius
I thought that at first too.
But a few weeks ago I was listening to the radio and they broke down what the team could really look like. And it was very ugly.
Not to mention they are going to start with no prospect pool whatsoever.
And in a very weak top 5 in this years draft it was a bad year to bring them in. |
|
|
|
I thought that at first too.
But a few weeks ago I was listening to the radio and they broke down what the team could really look like. And it was very ugly.
Not to mention they are going to start with no prospect pool whatsoever.
And in a very weak top 5 in this years draft it was a bad year to bring them in. - Santo_44
|
|
Arctic_AARDVARK
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Retired, ON Joined: 07.24.2011
|
|
|
I thought that at first too.
But a few weeks ago I was listening to the radio and they broke down what the team could really look like. And it was very ugly.
Not to mention they are going to start with no prospect pool whatsoever.
And in a very weak top 5 in this years draft it was a bad year to bring them in. - Santo_44
good.. (frank) them.
A hockey team in Vegas? wtf... |
|