Oh great, here comes the MiB's trade Kadri blog tomorrow
- Steven_Seagull

interference imo

Okay that's a kick

darn

C'mon Andersen - need that 1

Edit: nvm, deflected
- Garnie

na..he should have had it..

Okay that's a kick
- Santo_44

Maybe not

interference imo
- daeth

and a kick. Although they constantly (frank) up these calls so... who knows.

Time to review. That's interference AND a kick.

Uggggg

JVR for Travis Hamonic? God we need help on D.

Snow is having a sales event. Everyone must go

I don't care about blocked shots much I guess
- daeth

Well, you need to not let the guy walk in....hence you need to be out there pretending to block it I guess.

Would be nice if the Leafs had a good starting goalie.

Time to review. That's interference AND a kick.
- lumlums

The goalie interference review has been a disaster this year.

I don't even know what it is anymore

So, I guess that you can actually interfere with the goalie, as long as it's the Leafs goalie

last touch was his stick but someone used their skate to move andersen in the crease. i don't get it.

So Nash is allowed to boot his pad and make him spin? Isn't that textbook interference?

Still 2 and 46

If that was a leaf goal it would have been called back on interference

The goalie interference review has been a disaster this year.

I don't even know what it is anymore
- Santo_44

Simple.

If the goalie has a Leaf on his jersey, it's a goal.

If the player has a Leaf on his jersey, it's not a goal.

Would be nice if the Leafs had a good starting goalie.




- Steven_Seagull

OR a ref playing for them

So Nash is allowed to boot his pad and make him spin? Isn't that textbook interference?
- markmark

yes but apparently it doesn't matter

If that was a leaf goal it would have been called back on interference
- bmoney411

And Kadri would get a penalty even if he wasnt on the ice.

So Nash is allowed to boot his pad and make him spin? Isn't that textbook interference?
- markmark

If Kadri did it...no goal.

last touch was his stick but someone used their skate to move andersen in the crease. i don't get it.
- daeth

Did we review and lose timeout or did the refs just review it for fun?

I missed it.

So Nash is allowed to boot his pad and make him spin? Isn't that textbook interference?
- markmark

Like I said above.

It's a disaster and they need to get rid of the review. You can't take away goals on soft interfierences but not on others.

Take it out completely and count on the refs to not be complete idiots on the obvious interfierences like the Malkin goal a few years ago

im surprised babcock isnt looking mad in the bench