fifty__missions
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Burkie's Rented Barn, ON Joined: 02.12.2013
|
|
|
I'd pass. Find a cheaper solution - poohcrumbs
Exactly. The cheaper solution is hoping he really wants to be a Leaf and having a chat on July 1st. |
|
|
|
(frank), you guys may as well start tossing Matthews and Marner in the trade discussions
Because trading Nylander is about as likely.
For real, though, just stop bringing it up. he's not going anywhere - WingmanWillie
Likelihood of Marner and MAtthews being traded is 0,0001%
Likelihood of Nylander being traded around 10-15%.
So not true. |
|
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON Joined: 09.20.2010
|
|
|
Nylander/Carrick would be a starter or JVR/Carrick maybe? - Garnie
for shats?
No...I dont think so....he has no term |
|
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON Joined: 09.20.2010
|
|
|
Exactly. The cheaper solution is hoping he really wants to be a Leaf and having a chat on July 1st. - fifty__missions
He'll sign with a new york team |
|
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON Joined: 09.20.2010
|
|
|
(frank), you guys may as well start tossing Matthews and Marner in the trade discussions
Because trading Nylander is about as likely.
For real, though, just stop bringing it up. he's not going anywhere - WingmanWillie
Not true at all.
Matthews and Marner...no chance of being traded.
Nylander, while I hope he isnt, much more likely to be used over the other two. |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
(frank), you guys may as well start tossing Matthews and Marner in the trade discussions
Because trading Nylander is about as likely.
For real, though, just stop bringing it up. he's not going anywhere - WingmanWillie
We're not trading him, but to get Shats...the blues aren't going to take Carrick and a 2nd or something. What do you do if he does get traded? Get a new handle?
|
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
for shats?
No...I dont think so....he has no term - Fakepartofme
obviously he'd have to agree to a contract 1st.
|
|
WingmanWillie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: A dog on the puck, just looking for a snizzbone Joined: 04.17.2015
|
|
|
Not true at all.
Matthews and Marner...no chance of being traded.
Nylander, while I hope he isnt, much more likely to be used over the other two. - Fakepartofme
it was an extreme comment, to be sure.
But I'm seeing his name in way too many proposals. It isn't happening |
|
WingmanWillie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: A dog on the puck, just looking for a snizzbone Joined: 04.17.2015
|
|
|
We're not trading him, but to get Shats...the blues aren't going to take Carrick and a 2nd or something. What do you do if he does get traded? Get a new handle? - Garnie
The Blues would take anything over nothing |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
The Blues would take anything over nothing - WingmanWillie
Maybe...more teams then TO trying to get him. I think they'll get a good player for him...but who knows. |
|
WingmanWillie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: A dog on the puck, just looking for a snizzbone Joined: 04.17.2015
|
|
|
We're not trading him, but to get Shats...the blues aren't going to take Carrick and a 2nd or something. What do you do if he does get traded? Get a new handle? - Garnie
That's why you haven't seen TheThrill around in a while |
|
Arctic_AARDVARK
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Retired, ON Joined: 07.24.2011
|
|
|
Not true at all.
Matthews and Marner...no chance of being traded.
Nylander, while I hope he isnt, much more likely to be used over the other two. - Fakepartofme
I'd only trade Nylander if someone like Ekblad was coming back.. |
|
bobbyisno1
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I'm excited to see that Joined: 08.28.2010
|
|
|
it's a deadline deal for STL.
either get nothing, or get a relative limited return.
(by the way i don't think leafs will make a trade for shattenkirk, i think they'll go after other options) - MaximusAurelius
Does that mean they're keeping Nylander.. |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
|
|
it was an extreme comment, to be sure.
But I'm seeing his name in way too many proposals. It isn't happening - WingmanWillie
people include him in trade proposals because Leafs have Marner and MAtthews, who are very effective and very good on defensive side as well.
Nylander, while projecting as a player with excellent offensive skills, is not that effective on the defensive part.
Nylander is 2 steps down from Marner and Matthews.
Leafs need a big upgrade on d.
Quite obvious that Nylander could be the one to be traded.
I personally wouldn't give him up in a trade for Shattenkirk though.
Leafs should target a younger d in exchange for Nylander (IF they consider to trade him at all) |
|
|
|
Does that mean they're keeping Nylander.. - bobbyisno1
quite sure the leafs will hold on to nylander at least for another season.
Mattias Ekholm is a guy I can see Leafs making a trade for. |
|
BorjeFan4Ever
Season Ticket Holder |
|
|
Location: not the BigSmoke anymore Joined: 10.29.2007
|
|
|
people include him in trade proposals because Leafs have Marner and MAtthews, who are very effective and very good on defensive side as well.
Nylander, while projecting as a player with excellent offensive skills, is not that effective on the defensive part.
Nylander is 2 steps down from Marner and Matthews.
Leafs need a big upgrade on d.
Quite obvious that Nylander could be the one to be traded.
I personally wouldn't give him up in a trade for Shattenkirk though.
Leafs should target a younger d in exchange for Nylander (IF they consider to trade him at all) - MaximusAurelius
Nylander + Corrado
for
Paryako + Yakupov then. |
|
TheMussel
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 09.24.2013
|
|
|
Why is Griffith back? - burn
Kapanen |
|
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON Joined: 09.20.2010
|
|
|
I'd only trade Nylander if someone like Ekblad was coming back.. - Arctic_AARDVARK
Oh it would have to be a great player coming back for sure.
Which makes it less likely to happen |
|
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON Joined: 09.20.2010
|
|
|
Nylander + Corrado
for
Paryako + Yakupov then. - BorjeFan4Ever
Corrado has no value. |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
We should have signed Grabner and played him on the 4th line this year. |
|
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON Joined: 09.20.2010
|
|
|
people include him in trade proposals because Leafs have Marner and MAtthews, who are very effective and very good on defensive side as well.
Nylander, while projecting as a player with excellent offensive skills, is not that effective on the defensive part.
Nylander is 2 steps down from Marner and Matthews.
Leafs need a big upgrade on d.
Quite obvious that Nylander could be the one to be traded.
I personally wouldn't give him up in a trade for Shattenkirk though.
Leafs should target a younger d in exchange for Nylander (IF they consider to trade him at all) - MaximusAurelius
oh hell no.
Nylander for Shat......no way!!! |
|
WingmanWillie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: A dog on the puck, just looking for a snizzbone Joined: 04.17.2015
|
|
|
You guys excited for Carrick on the top pair and Marincin-Zaitsev? |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
You guys excited for Carrick on the top pair and Marincin-Zaitsev? - WingmanWillie
yikes
|
|
|
|
You guys excited for Carrick on the top pair and Marincin-Zaitsev? - WingmanWillie
quite sure this pairing will get offensive topline of opponents. |
|