walshyleafsfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita Joined: 07.14.2011
|
|
|
Carrick is totally a top-four D. - Steven_Seagull
Never been sold on that kid |
|
daeth
Colorado Avalanche |
|
|
Location: 43 points, ON Joined: 09.15.2005
|
|
|
coughs the puck up because he's afraid of the fearsome Johnson |
|
Phenom
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: TITS baby, TITS - Trust In The Shanaplan, ON Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
Looked awfully like 6 or more on the ice for TBL there... - lumlums
How long was that shift for Gardiner/Carrick, 2 mins? |
|
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON Joined: 02.28.2011
|
|
|
Steven_Seagull
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Mitch Marner sucks Joined: 03.03.2016
|
|
|
How long was that shift for Gardiner/Carrick, 2 mins? - Phenom
3 mins too long |
|
dmnted
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Space for Rent Joined: 08.30.2006
|
|
|
good time for a PP goal boys
|
|
daeth
Colorado Avalanche |
|
|
Location: 43 points, ON Joined: 09.15.2005
|
|
|
Leafs still got this - Zezel
Probably |
|
BestRapperAlive
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: OEL is one of the greatest players of his generation - James Tanner Joined: 06.21.2012
|
|
|
Do we agree that Carrick sucks? |
|
burn
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON Joined: 08.02.2006
|
|
|
hagar58
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 07.12.2013
|
|
|
How long was that shift for Gardiner/Carrick, 2 mins? - Phenom
Too long |
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
How long was that shift for Gardiner/Carrick, 2 mins? - Phenom
Felt like a (frank)ing lifetime |
|
burn
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON Joined: 08.02.2006
|
|
|
Do we agree that Carrick sucks? - BestRapperAlive
No |
|
gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown Joined: 02.19.2009
|
|
|
How do you give up this many odd man rushes and chances when you're on the PP? |
|
Steven_Seagull
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Mitch Marner sucks Joined: 03.03.2016
|
|
|
Do we agree that Carrick sucks? - BestRapperAlive
Tanner thinks he's good, so that should tell you something. Third pairing at best. |
|
daeth
Colorado Avalanche |
|
|
Location: 43 points, ON Joined: 09.15.2005
|
|
|
Do we agree that Carrick sucks? - BestRapperAlive
Never liked him but he's probably better than I think |
|
gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown Joined: 02.19.2009
|
|
|
Do we agree that Carrick sucks? - BestRapperAlive
Nah. Whole team looks shaky and out of sync tonight. |
|
walshyleafsfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita Joined: 07.14.2011
|
|
|
Do we agree that Carrick sucks? - BestRapperAlive
Don't mind him as a cheap No. 6.
But other than that? Not for me |
|
daeth
Colorado Avalanche |
|
|
Location: 43 points, ON Joined: 09.15.2005
|
|
|
Both teams on the back end of a back to back and it shows |
|
Phenom
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: TITS baby, TITS - Trust In The Shanaplan, ON Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
Are we allowed to decline PPs? |
|
BestRapperAlive
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: OEL is one of the greatest players of his generation - James Tanner Joined: 06.21.2012
|
|
|
Consensus seems to be carrick does not in fact suck. He sure does tonight though |
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
Don't mind him as a cheap No. 6.
But other than that? Not for me - walshyleafsfan
The idea that we can't trade for a higher end guy because it would mean exposing Carrick is looking more and more foolish by the day.
I like the kid, but it's looking more and more like he'll be a third pairing guy with some PP time as needed. |
|
burn
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON Joined: 08.02.2006
|
|
|
The idea that we can't trade for a higher end guy because it would mean exposing Carrick is looking more and more foolish by the day.
I like the kid, but it's looking more and more like he'll be a third pairing guy with some PP time as needed. - lumlums
What on earth? Seems that would be pretty foolish as soon as that was said.
Currently carrick is the leafs 4th best dman by a lot. |
|
Phenom
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: TITS baby, TITS - Trust In The Shanaplan, ON Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
The idea that we can't trade for a higher end guy because it would mean exposing Carrick is looking more and more foolish by the day.
I like the kid, but it's looking more and more like he'll be a third pairing guy with some PP time as needed. - lumlums
Agreed. Dont mind leaving the kid exposed if we can get a true top 4 through trade. |
|
MountAlbert
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Mount Albert, ON Joined: 01.08.2013
|
|
|
i like that boil - Zezel
Not if it was on your back ! |
|
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news Joined: 03.14.2014
|
|
|
The idea that we can't trade for a higher end guy because it would mean exposing Carrick is looking more and more foolish by the day.
I like the kid, but it's looking more and more like he'll be a third pairing guy with some PP time as needed. - lumlums
Yeah - if we can add to top 4 and relace hunwick with carrick we'd be in pretty good shape. |
|