Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: Playoffs; possibility or pipedream?, Leafs vs Lightning
Author Message
walshyleafsfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita
Joined: 07.14.2011

Dec 29 @ 9:12 PM ET
Carrick is totally a top-four D.
- Steven_Seagull

Never been sold on that kid
daeth
Colorado Avalanche
Location: 43 points, ON
Joined: 09.15.2005

Dec 29 @ 9:13 PM ET
coughs the puck up because he's afraid of the fearsome Johnson
Phenom
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: TITS baby, TITS - Trust In The Shanaplan, ON
Joined: 08.12.2010

Dec 29 @ 9:13 PM ET
Looked awfully like 6 or more on the ice for TBL there...
- lumlums


How long was that shift for Gardiner/Carrick, 2 mins?
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON
Joined: 02.28.2011

Dec 29 @ 9:13 PM ET
Leafs still got this
Steven_Seagull
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mitch Marner sucks
Joined: 03.03.2016

Dec 29 @ 9:14 PM ET
How long was that shift for Gardiner/Carrick, 2 mins?
- Phenom



3 mins too long
dmnted
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Space for Rent
Joined: 08.30.2006

Dec 29 @ 9:14 PM ET
good time for a PP goal boys


daeth
Colorado Avalanche
Location: 43 points, ON
Joined: 09.15.2005

Dec 29 @ 9:14 PM ET
Leafs still got this
- Zezel

Probably
BestRapperAlive
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: OEL is one of the greatest players of his generation - James Tanner
Joined: 06.21.2012

Dec 29 @ 9:14 PM ET
Do we agree that Carrick sucks?
burn
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON
Joined: 08.02.2006

Dec 29 @ 9:14 PM ET
Huge save bibeau.
hagar58
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 07.12.2013

Dec 29 @ 9:15 PM ET
How long was that shift for Gardiner/Carrick, 2 mins?
- Phenom

Too long
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 06.25.2011

Dec 29 @ 9:15 PM ET
How long was that shift for Gardiner/Carrick, 2 mins?
- Phenom


Felt like a (frank)ing lifetime
burn
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON
Joined: 08.02.2006

Dec 29 @ 9:15 PM ET
Do we agree that Carrick sucks?
- BestRapperAlive



No
gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown
Joined: 02.19.2009

Dec 29 @ 9:15 PM ET
How do you give up this many odd man rushes and chances when you're on the PP?
Steven_Seagull
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mitch Marner sucks
Joined: 03.03.2016

Dec 29 @ 9:15 PM ET
Do we agree that Carrick sucks?
- BestRapperAlive



Tanner thinks he's good, so that should tell you something. Third pairing at best.
daeth
Colorado Avalanche
Location: 43 points, ON
Joined: 09.15.2005

Dec 29 @ 9:15 PM ET
Do we agree that Carrick sucks?
- BestRapperAlive

Never liked him but he's probably better than I think
gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown
Joined: 02.19.2009

Dec 29 @ 9:16 PM ET
Do we agree that Carrick sucks?
- BestRapperAlive


Nah. Whole team looks shaky and out of sync tonight.
walshyleafsfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita
Joined: 07.14.2011

Dec 29 @ 9:16 PM ET
Do we agree that Carrick sucks?
- BestRapperAlive

Don't mind him as a cheap No. 6.

But other than that? Not for me
daeth
Colorado Avalanche
Location: 43 points, ON
Joined: 09.15.2005

Dec 29 @ 9:16 PM ET
Both teams on the back end of a back to back and it shows
Phenom
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: TITS baby, TITS - Trust In The Shanaplan, ON
Joined: 08.12.2010

Dec 29 @ 9:16 PM ET
Are we allowed to decline PPs?
BestRapperAlive
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: OEL is one of the greatest players of his generation - James Tanner
Joined: 06.21.2012

Dec 29 @ 9:18 PM ET
Consensus seems to be carrick does not in fact suck. He sure does tonight though
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 06.25.2011

Dec 29 @ 9:18 PM ET
Don't mind him as a cheap No. 6.

But other than that? Not for me

- walshyleafsfan


The idea that we can't trade for a higher end guy because it would mean exposing Carrick is looking more and more foolish by the day.

I like the kid, but it's looking more and more like he'll be a third pairing guy with some PP time as needed.
burn
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON
Joined: 08.02.2006

Dec 29 @ 9:20 PM ET
The idea that we can't trade for a higher end guy because it would mean exposing Carrick is looking more and more foolish by the day.

I like the kid, but it's looking more and more like he'll be a third pairing guy with some PP time as needed.

- lumlums



What on earth? Seems that would be pretty foolish as soon as that was said.

Currently carrick is the leafs 4th best dman by a lot.
Phenom
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: TITS baby, TITS - Trust In The Shanaplan, ON
Joined: 08.12.2010

Dec 29 @ 9:21 PM ET
The idea that we can't trade for a higher end guy because it would mean exposing Carrick is looking more and more foolish by the day.

I like the kid, but it's looking more and more like he'll be a third pairing guy with some PP time as needed.

- lumlums


Agreed. Dont mind leaving the kid exposed if we can get a true top 4 through trade.
MountAlbert
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mount Albert, ON
Joined: 01.08.2013

Dec 29 @ 9:21 PM ET
i like that boil
- Zezel

Not if it was on your back !
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news
Joined: 03.14.2014

Dec 29 @ 9:21 PM ET
The idea that we can't trade for a higher end guy because it would mean exposing Carrick is looking more and more foolish by the day.

I like the kid, but it's looking more and more like he'll be a third pairing guy with some PP time as needed.

- lumlums


Yeah - if we can add to top 4 and relace hunwick with carrick we'd be in pretty good shape.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20  Next