Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: Nylander being nudged?
Author Message
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 06.25.2011

Nov 29 @ 10:19 AM ET
Canucks thread will be on lock down by 9:00 eastern
- Redmile247


Why not say 6:00 pacific? Why does everything have to be done to cater to the east? huh? HUH?


bobbyisno1
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I'm excited to see that
Joined: 08.28.2010

Nov 29 @ 10:20 AM ET
So the 1st round pick doesn't make much sense.

JVR for Hamilton is the hockey part of the trade.

JVR is an FA after 1.5 more years so need to sweeten the pot.

Throw in a conditional 2nd rounder if he re-signs.

Carrick will get exposed during Expansion draft if we get Hamilton so might as well throw him in and give Calgary a defender back.

Leivo doesn't have a spot on the team and could add some long term depth to the Calgary offense.


I don't see calgary biting on it though. Leafs aren't in a position yet to start mortgaging the future.

- TheMussel

Not sure Carrick has to be proteceted.
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news
Joined: 03.14.2014

Nov 29 @ 10:21 AM ET
So the 1st round pick doesn't make much sense.

JVR for Hamilton is the hockey part of the trade.

JVR is an FA after 1.5 more years so need to sweeten the pot.

Throw in a conditional 2nd rounder if he re-signs.

Carrick will get exposed during Expansion draft if we get Hamilton so might as well throw him in and give Calgary a defender back.

Leivo doesn't have a spot on the team and could add some long term depth to the Calgary offense.


I don't see calgary biting on it though. Leafs aren't in a position yet to start mortgaging the future.

- TheMussel


Yeah, this is pretty much why I don’t hate this trade as much as I initially did … I like your idea of the conditional 2nd.

From our perspective, Demott and Nielsen are still in the system. kapanen or leispic can be called up to take jvr’s place.
bobbyisno1
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I'm excited to see that
Joined: 08.28.2010

Nov 29 @ 10:21 AM ET
https://www.nhl.com/news/...n-draft-rules/c-281010592
MaximusAurelius
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: #FireDubas
Joined: 04.23.2012

Nov 29 @ 10:22 AM ET
Not sure Carrick has to be proteceted.
- bobbyisno1


only if he plays 21 more games.
he can have a half a year holidays on Robidas island if he wants to stay in Leafs org.
(that is, if Leafs have two other D-man to protect over Rielly).

Right now, with no trades, it seems Gardiner,Rielly, Carrick (if playing 21 more games) will be protected. Zaitsev is exempt.
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 06.25.2011

Nov 29 @ 10:22 AM ET
Maybe.

There were better players available at that #5 spot though.

- Scabeh


Like Sergachev, AMIRITE?
TheMussel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 09.24.2013

Nov 29 @ 10:23 AM ET
https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-expansion-draft-rules/c-281010592
- bobbyisno1


Assuming the Leafs protect 7 F, 3 D and a G,

it would be carrick or someone else that gets protected.

I don't see anyone else outside of Rielly or Gardiner that requires protection except Carrick
Scabeh
Montreal Canadiens
Location: The Slovakian Jagr, QC
Joined: 02.25.2007

Nov 29 @ 10:24 AM ET
Like Sergachev, AMIRITE?
- lumlums


He's one of them.

Nylander was another one. Tkachuk too....
bobbyisno1
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I'm excited to see that
Joined: 08.28.2010

Nov 29 @ 10:24 AM ET
only if he plays 21 more games.
he can have a half a year holidays on Robidas island if he wants to stay in Leafs org.
(that is, if Leafs have two other D-man to protect over Rielly).

Right now, with no trades, it seems Gardiner,Rielly, Carrick (if playing 21 more games) will be protected. Zaitsev is exempt.

- MaximusAurelius

It's all very confusing, in the rules it says they have to leave 1 defenseman exposed with over 40 games.
TheMussel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 09.24.2013

Nov 29 @ 10:26 AM ET
It's all very confusing, in the rules it says they have to leave 1 defenseman exposed with over 40 games.
- bobbyisno1


At minimum.

The teams don't expose players, they protect players.

Eligible players that aren't protected automatically get exposed. The clause you're talking about is in the event that, let's say, a team has 7 D-men and 6 are rookies and one is a vet, and they try to protect the vet, they can't do that because the remaining 6 are ineligible to be drafted by Vegas

In the case of the Leafs, you have (in my view)

Hunwick - Eligible
Polak - Eligible
Carrick - Protected
Rielly - Protected
Zaitsev - Ineligible (rookie)
Gardiner - Protected
Corrado - Ineligible (not enough games)
Marincin - Eligible
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news
Joined: 03.14.2014

Nov 29 @ 10:28 AM ET
only if he plays 21 more games.
he can have a half a year holidays on Robidas island if he wants to stay in Leafs org.
(that is, if Leafs have two other D-man to protect over Rielly).

Right now, with no trades, it seems Gardiner,Rielly, Carrick (if playing 21 more games) will be protected. Zaitsev is exempt.

- MaximusAurelius


the 21 games is to meet the 40/70 game team requirement to expose players with minimum number of games played.

carrick does need protection.
TheMussel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 09.24.2013

Nov 29 @ 10:31 AM ET
the 21 games is to meet the 40/70 game team requirement to expose players with minimum number of games played.

carrick does need protection.

- Tumbleweed


Carrick needs protection because he's a 3rd year pro. I agree.

Again, the Leafs don't expose players, they protect them.

There are rules for the types of players that are required to be exposed, but that doesn't mean Carrick is exempt from being drafted over someone who meets said requirements if they're both exposed.
MaximusAurelius
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: #FireDubas
Joined: 04.23.2012

Nov 29 @ 10:33 AM ET
It's all very confusing, in the rules it says they have to leave 1 defenseman exposed with over 40 games.
- bobbyisno1


Teams have to expose at least 1 D (with 40games played this years, or 70 in last two year), with a contract until at least July 2018, and which is not exempt (the young players with less than x nhl seasons).

As well at least 2FW with similar criteria and 1 goalie.

On D, it will be [at least] Marincin that will be exposed.

On FW, Leafs would either have to acquire FWs that meet the above description, OR expose 2 players out of the group of Bozak, Komarov, Martin, OR get Lupul / Leivo / Rychel up to the minimum of games. (or a combination of above).
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON
Joined: 09.20.2010

Nov 29 @ 10:33 AM ET
Actually, it was Wade Redden. Shows why they're a middling franchise that just treads water.
- PrinceLH

Went to a cup final a several years back.
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news
Joined: 03.14.2014

Nov 29 @ 10:34 AM ET
Carrick needs protection because he's a 3rd year pro.

Again, the Leafs don't expose players, they protect them.

There are rules for the types of players that are required to be exposed, but that doesn't mean Carrick is exempt from being drafted over someone who meets said requirements if they're both exposed.

- TheMussel


agreed.

maricin etc. already meet the minimum games requirement for exposure, so if the leafs want to protect carrick, there should be no rule preventing them for doing that.

vermie22
Joined: 07.13.2011

Nov 29 @ 10:37 AM ET
At minimum.

In the case of the Leafs, you have (in my view)

Hunwick - Eligible
Polak - Eligible
Carrick - Protected
Rielly - Protected
Zaitsev - Ineligible (rookie)
Gardiner - Protected
Corrado - Ineligible (not enough games)
Marincin - Eligible

- TheMussel



i) One defenseman who is a) under contract in 2017-18 and b) played in 40 or more NHL games the prior season OR played in 70 or more NHL games in the prior two seasons.


Hunwick, Polak don't have contracts for 17-18, so they can't count as one of the exposed D players unless they sign extensions. They will have to expose Marincin or Carrick I believe. Corrado is a RFA next year, so he also can't be included as the 1 that meets the above requirements.
TheMussel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 09.24.2013

Nov 29 @ 10:37 AM ET
Alright, now that we've gotten the daily expansion draft rule debate out of the way, I won't want to trade Nylander.

I still think he's gonna be amazing offensively, and if he doesn't end up being a Bergeron in his own end and the Leafs decide it's time to move on, then we can still trade him for greater than what we got for Kessel
TheMussel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 09.24.2013

Nov 29 @ 10:38 AM ET
i) One defenseman who is a) under contract in 2017-18 and b) played in 40 or more NHL games the prior season OR played in 70 or more NHL games in the prior two seasons.


Hunwick, Polak don't have contracts for 17-18, so they can't count as one of the exposed D players unless they sign extensions. They will have to expose Marincin or Carrick I believe. Corrado is a RFA next year, so he also can't be included as the 1 that meets the above requirements.

- vermie22


Fair, didn't take that into account.
Scabeh
Montreal Canadiens
Location: The Slovakian Jagr, QC
Joined: 02.25.2007

Nov 29 @ 10:38 AM ET
Carrick needs protection because he's a 3rd year pro. I agree.

Again, the Leafs don't expose players, they protect them.

There are rules for the types of players that are required to be exposed, but that doesn't mean Carrick is exempt from being drafted over someone who meets said requirements if they're both exposed.

- TheMussel


If the expansion draft happened on hockeybuzz.

I'd protect you.
MountAlbert
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mount Albert, ON
Joined: 01.08.2013

Nov 29 @ 10:38 AM ET
JVR Carrick 1st. Leivo for Hamilton?
- poohcrumbs

Too much
TheMussel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 09.24.2013

Nov 29 @ 10:39 AM ET
If the expansion draft happened on hockeybuzz.

I'd protect you.

- Scabeh


Is Howard Berger looking for participants for his website?
Redmile247
Calgary Flames
Joined: 03.17.2013

Nov 29 @ 10:40 AM ET
Why not say 6:00 pacific? Why does everything have to be done to cater to the east? huh? HUH?



- lumlums




Scabeh
Montreal Canadiens
Location: The Slovakian Jagr, QC
Joined: 02.25.2007

Nov 29 @ 10:43 AM ET
Is Howard Berger looking for participants for his website?
- TheMussel


God I miss that man.
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON
Joined: 09.20.2010

Nov 29 @ 10:43 AM ET
nylander is sergei berezin 2.0

his efforts on the back check are non existent

dont fall in love with a guy who is all offense and nothing else...

- Dozzer

Bingo.
But he's still young....lots of time to improve.
Scabeh
Montreal Canadiens
Location: The Slovakian Jagr, QC
Joined: 02.25.2007

Nov 29 @ 10:44 AM ET
Bingo.
But he's still young....lots of time to improve.

- Fakepartofme


For the record.

I think Berezin was awesome.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23  Next