explain the relevance of your question to the issue of bogus asylum seekers in possession of child porn.
- D0PPELGANGER

because it seems like you framed the issue to promote the idea that there are more criminals amongst these refugees than there are in the general canadian population. And I want to see if I guessed right or not. So just answer my question.

That particular refugee with child pornography needs to stay out, no question.

because it seems like you framed the issue to promote the idea that there are more criminals amongst these refugees than there are in the general canadian population. And I want to see if I guessed right or not. So just answer my question.

That particular refugee with child pornography needs to stay out, no question.
- SourceS.V.P.

and if they had a gun or if they had drugs. it's common sense. dErps is just a complete (frank)ing idiot and trying to produce an argument again. because he lives for that. because he's a loser.

because it seems like you framed the issue to promote the idea that there are more criminals amongst these refugees than there are in the general canadian population. And I want to see if I guessed right or not. So just answer my question.

That particular refugee with child pornography needs to stay out, no question.
- SourceS.V.P.

Okay I posted .............. " Handful Of Refugees Caught Bringing Child Porn Across NY-Quebec Border" .............. and YOU assumed I was promoting that there were more criminals among these bogus asylum seekers ............


First of all, they're technically all criminals for crossing the border into Canada illegally ..... and they've all been "arrested" by the police for doing so.

But that has nothing to do with the handful caught in possession of child porn.

I don't know about you, but I don't want anyone caught with child porn to be allowed into Canada, whether or not they're legal immigrants, or bogus refugees.

Perhaps you believe that if the percentage of child porn offenders among the bogus refugees is the the same as the percentage of those caught in possession of child porn in Canada, then it's somehow okay, or who knows what point you were trying to make ................. but there is nothing lower than people who are in possession of child porn, not matter how you seem to be trying to justify it...............if that is what you were trying to do.

what a (frank)ing dippoop.

Okay I posted .............. " Handful Of Refugees Caught Bringing Child Porn Across NY-Quebec Border" .............. and YOU assumed I was promoting that there were more criminals among these bogus asylum seekers ............


First of all, they're technically all criminals for crossing the border into Canada illegally ..... and they've all been "arrested" by the police for doing so.

But that has nothing to do with the handful caught in possession of child porn.

I don't know about you, but I don't want anyone caught with child porn to be allowed into Canada, whether or not they're legal immigrants, or bogus refugees.

Perhaps you believe that if the percentage of child porn offenders among the bogus refugees is the the same as the percentage of those caught in possession of child porn in Canada, then it's somehow okay, or who knows what point you were trying to make ................. but there is nothing lower than people who are in possession of child porn, not matter how you seem to be trying to justify it...............if that is what you were trying to do.
- D0PPELGANGER

I already said that I didn't want that guy with child porn in our country.

You should be grateful that I asked you my question, actually. You always whine about how people assume that you mean this and that. Now for once, someone(me) asks you what's your intent behind a particular post. So you should seize that. It's just one word : "yes" or "no". You still haven't done it.

That particular refugee with child pornography needs to stay out, no question.
- SourceS.V.P.

I don't know about you, but I don't want anyone caught with child porn to be allowed into Canada, whether or not they're legal immigrants, or bogus refugees.


- D0PPELGANGER

how? how do you not know? he just said it. you incredibly stupid bumhole.

I already said that I didn't want that guy with child porn in our contry.

You should be grateful that I asked you my question, actually. You always whine about how people assume that you mean this and that. Now for once, someone(me) asks you what's your intent is behind a particular post. So you should seize that.
- SourceS.V.P.

he's doing his "digging" thing where he already lost and he tries to change the subject and just digs himself a deeper hole.

like he has to do every day.

Just a picture of Obama speaking at KKK grand wizard Robert Byrd's funeral


- D0PPELGANGER

He wasn't a grand wizard, and he renounced the KKK, and as his career progressed, he distanced himself more and more from the right, supporting social progress, and civil liberties for all.

Interesting you attack him, and say nothing about the tangerine terror's inability to denounce David Duke, despite being given many opportunities.

Okay I posted .............. " Handful Of Refugees Caught Bringing Child Porn Across NY-Quebec Border" .............. and YOU assumed I was promoting that there were more criminals among these bogus asylum seekers ............


First of all, they're technically all criminals for crossing the border into Canada illegally ..... and they've all been "arrested" by the police for doing so.

But that has nothing to do with the handful caught in possession of child porn.

I don't know about you, but I don't want anyone caught with child porn to be allowed into Canada, whether or not they're legal immigrants, or bogus refugees.

Perhaps you believe that if the percentage of child porn offenders among the bogus refugees is the the same as the percentage of those caught in possession of child porn in Canada, then it's somehow okay, or who knows what point you were trying to make ................. but there is nothing lower than people who are in possession of child porn, not matter how you seem to be trying to justify it...............if that is what you were trying to do.
- D0PPELGANGER

He's not justifying anything. He's repeatedly stated that he does not believe people caught with child porn should be let into Canada. He's simply saying that you seem to be framing the argument in a way that paints all of them as pedophiles and dangerous criminals, you incomprehensible twat.

Seriously, we went over this when you weren't here and essentially all agreed that this shouldn't be happening and they should be processed through the proper channels. We shouldn't block people from coming to Canada, but we should make sure that everyone who comes in is sent through the proper procedures.

Funny how easy it was when you weren't here uncontrollably poopting yourself.

He wasn't a grand wizard, and he renounced the KKK, and as his career progressed, he distanced himself more and more from the right, supporting social progress, and civil liberties for all.

Interesting you attack him, and say nothing about the tangerine terror's inability to denounce David Duke, despite being given many opportunities.
- Feeling Glucky?

holy poop, dErps. when was the last time you posted something that actually helped your argument?

Okay I posted .............. " Handful Of Refugees Caught Bringing Child Porn Across NY-Quebec Border" .............. and YOU assumed I was promoting that there were more criminals among these bogus asylum seekers ............


First of all, they're technically all criminals for crossing the border into Canada illegally ..... and they've all been "arrested" by the police for doing so.

But that has nothing to do with the handful caught in possession of child porn.

I don't know about you, but I don't want anyone caught with child porn to be allowed into Canada, whether or not they're legal immigrants, or bogus refugees.

Perhaps you believe that if the percentage of child porn offenders among the bogus refugees is the the same as the percentage of those caught in possession of child porn in Canada, then it's somehow okay, or who knows what point you were trying to make ................. but there is nothing lower than people who are in possession of child porn, not matter how you seem to be trying to justify it...............if that is what you were trying to do.
- D0PPELGANGER

You respond very poorly to being challenged... despite a lifetime of experience.

He's not justifying anything. He's repeatedly stated that he does not believe people caught with child porn should be let into Canada. He's simply saying that you seem to be framing the argument in a way that paints all of them as pedophiles and dangerous criminals, you incomprehensible twat.

Seriously, we went over this when you weren't here and essentially all agreed that this shouldn't be happening and they should be processed through the proper channels. We shouldn't block people from coming to Canada, but we should make sure that everyone who comes in is sent through the proper procedures.

Funny how easy it was when you weren't here uncontrollably poopting yourself.
- BINGO!

You respond very poorly to being challenged... despite a lifetime of experience.
- Feeling Glucky?

holy poop, dErps. when was the last time you posted something that actually helped your argument?
- kicksave856

I prefer Dopppoop.

I prefer Dopppoop.
- Feeling Glucky?

he apparently does too because he consistently makes himself look like poop.

Okay I posted .............. " Handful Of Refugees Caught Bringing Child Porn Across NY-Quebec Border" .............. and YOU assumed I was promoting that there were more criminals among these bogus asylum seekers ............


First of all, they're technically all criminals for crossing the border into Canada illegally ..... and they've all been "arrested" by the police for doing so.

But that has nothing to do with the handful caught in possession of child porn.

I don't know about you, but I don't want anyone caught with child porn to be allowed into Canada, whether or not they're legal immigrants, or bogus refugees.

Perhaps you believe that if the percentage of child porn offenders among the bogus refugees is the the same as the percentage of those caught in possession of child porn in Canada, then it's somehow okay, or who knows what point you were trying to make ................. but there is nothing lower than people who are in possession of child porn, not matter how you seem to be trying to justify it...............if that is what you were trying to do.
- D0PPELGANGER

You know that saying about how assuming makes an ass out of you and me?

You're proving it wrong. You're just making an ass out of yourself.

You know that saying about how assuming makes an ass out of you and me?

You're proving it wrong. You're just making an ass out of yourself.
- Feeling Glucky?

what a beating. 2 days in a row.


the best part is he'll be back for more. monday morning at the latest. he (frank)ing loves it.

So I guess you missed these "opportunities" .


- D0PPELGANGER

And what about all the times he refuses to?

When you need to wring out a condemnation of the KKK and neo-nazi groups... there's a problem. It's not exactly a hard political choice to make, unless you want their support.

And way to ignore the rest of the post. I'm not going assume you were lying on purpose to try and paint Obama as a KKK sympathizer. I'll give you this opportunity to explain why you posted that. Go ahead.

And what about all the times he refuses to?


- Feeling Glucky?

i guess he missed those "opportunities"

i guess he missed those "opportunities"
- kicksave856

You know who doesn't miss opportunities?

Dopps. Any chance he has to make an ass of himself, he takes it.

You know who doesn't miss opportunities?

Dopps. Any chance he has to make an ass of himself, he takes it.
- Feeling Glucky?

it's the only thing he's good at.

it's the only thing he's good at.
- kicksave856

It's because he's not reactive. He doesn't just wait for the opportunity to present itself, he makes his own opportunities. Pulls himself up by his ass-straps.

It's because he's not reactive. He doesn't just wait for the opportunity to present itself, he makes his own opportunities. Pulls himself up by his ass-straps.
- Feeling Glucky?

well this went well.

see ya monday, ass hole.

He's not justifying anything. He's repeatedly stated that he does not believe people caught with child porn should be let into Canada. He's simply saying that you seem to be framing the argument in a way that paints all of them as pedophiles and dangerous criminals, you incomprehensible twat.

Seriously, we went over this when you weren't here and essentially all agreed that this shouldn't be happening and they should be processed through the proper channels. We shouldn't block people from coming to Canada, but we should make sure that everyone who comes in is sent through the proper procedures.

Funny how easy it was when you weren't here uncontrollably poopting yourself.
- BINGO!

it wasn't presented in a way dopps understands. like with cartoons.