I've honestly got no idea why the Sens made that trade. They could've had all those guys drop off the end of this year and offered Shattenkirk 6.9 mil per year and be in a much better position.
Fair enough not wanting to pay Greening, Cowen and Michalek for one more year, but how they came to the idea that Phaneuf was a player that could make them better and a contract they were fine to take on, is beyond me.
It's honestly one of the worst trades made in recent memory (and will only get worse).
Obviously no way near as bad, but the Brassard trade was a puzzler as well.
- walshyleafsfan
phaneuf's contract is a little rough, but the cap hit is much higher than the actual $$ (which is what is important to our penny pinching dbag of an owner) and the sens aren't a cap team....so not a huge deal there.
as for him as a player, I think he's a very very good 2nd pairing d-man and has looked pretty good in Ottawa. obviously leaf fans think he sucks because he was HORRIBLY mis-used and mis-cast in Toronto. he was brought in to be a top pairing elite d-man, and he's clearly not that.
Ottawa gave up scraps, hell less than scraps, to get a bonafide top 4 d-man.....I have no issues with that trade.
as for brassard, I didn't love the trade at first but brass has looked pretty good so far. zibby has been putting up points, but he's always been a streaky player. i'll reserve judgement on that deal until zibby can prove that he can be productive for more than 5 out or 20 games at a time.