senstroll
|
|
|
Location: New Fan, Needs to watch Ballet, ON Joined: 02.22.2008
|
|
|
No no don't watch.....let's just look at some new fangled #'s and take them as exact player evaluators. - Garnie
points are not new stats |
|
the_eye
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.22.2012
|
|
|
95 percent is a little bit generous no? - ClarksonDavid
Yeah maybe 90 percent, that excludes about 80 players, 95 percent excludes about 40. |
|
bixll
|
|
|
Location: New Glasgow, NS Joined: 09.04.2008
|
|
|
points are not new stats - senstroll
|
|
the_eye
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.22.2012
|
|
|
Lindholm better - senstroll
Maybe, we'll see after this year when Rielly gets to play all the power plays and when he has a decent partner ( zaitsev? ) |
|
ClarksonDavid
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Rielly wouldn't, crack top 4 on the sens team -PtotheY, SK Joined: 03.15.2014
|
|
|
Yeah maybe 90 percent, that excludes about 80 players, 95 percent excludes about 40. - the_eye
Still pretty generous I think, maybe the 1st overall in a considered weak draft.. didn't Mackenzie say that Patrick would have went like 4th or 5th this year and will most likely be a 2nd line guy? |
|
the_eye
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.22.2012
|
|
|
points are not new stats - senstroll
What points are in the defensively better category?
You stated Lindholm was better defensively. |
|
Lucas Neilson
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Atlantic Division Blogger, ON Joined: 06.26.2015
|
|
|
New blog!
happy hump day |
|
the_eye
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.22.2012
|
|
|
Still pretty generous I think, maybe the 1st overall in a considered weak draft.. didn't Mackenzie say that Patrick would have went like 4th or 5th this year and will most likely be a 2nd line guy? - ClarksonDavid
Yeah and Mathews would have went behind Eichel. |
|
bixll
|
|
|
Location: New Glasgow, NS Joined: 09.04.2008
|
|
|
Yeah and Mathews would have went behind Eichel. - the_eye
Rather have Matthews. |
|
senstroll
|
|
|
Location: New Fan, Needs to watch Ballet, ON Joined: 02.22.2008
|
|
|
What points are in the defensively better category?
You stated Lindholm was better defensively. - the_eye
you are mixing up replies to two different people on different things
anyways doesnt matter |
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
Yeah and Mathews would have went behind Eichel. - the_eye
I don't think that there's anything to support that. |
|
the_eye
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.22.2012
|
|
|
I don't think that there's anything to support that. - lumlums
C'mon lums, sarcasm..
You're smarter than this.... |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
points are not new stats - senstroll
Oh
You know who's even better....we should trade for Brayden McNabb. |
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
C'mon lums, sarcasm..
You're smarter than this.... - the_eye
Of course.
Just didn't think that you were smart enough to pull it off... |
|
bixll
|
|
|
Location: New Glasgow, NS Joined: 09.04.2008
|
|
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
Do you have to be intelligent to pull it off.... Garnie may be in trouble then.. - bixll
|
|
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON Joined: 09.20.2010
|
|
|
what about watching the games instead of just using stats - senstroll
Your comment has nothing to do with the post.
Watching the games, he's pretty darn good. |
|
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON Joined: 09.20.2010
|
|
|
Leafs aren't getting Trouba
Sorry to kill everyone's buzz.
Gonna roll with what we have, and keep on keeping on - WingmanWillie
No one thinks they are.
But you'll have to upgrade the D soon enough. |
|
|
|
Leafs aren't getting Trouba
Sorry to kill everyone's buzz.
Gonna roll with what we have, and keep on keeping on - WingmanWillie
and Marner will play in the O this year. |
|
bixll
|
|
|
Location: New Glasgow, NS Joined: 09.04.2008
|
|
|
and Marner will play in the O this year. - zazzle
|
|
walshyleafsfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita Joined: 07.14.2011
|
|
|
I believe Trouba would be a nice addition to TML. But any of the forward prospects the Leafs have would not be of interest to the Peg, with the plethora of young talent they have up front.
They want a like for like player to Trouba which the Leafs only have Rielly. And I think the WCH just proved that Rielly is ahead of Trouba already in their careers so that would be a non starter for the Leafs. I can't imagine the Leafs trading the guy who lead NA in ice time and played in all situtions for the 7th D on NA. Especially with the great deal he's on. So other than Rielly, who would the Leafs have that would interest Winnipeg?
I heard Bob Mac say they aren't interested in any forwards or players who are unproven. But also have to be in the 22-23 age range who can grow with their young group. Seems like the Leafs aren't a fit.
It is fun when a young promising player demands a trade though, like Drouin it gets people talking. - Mrbs71
So, as far as we know, Winnipeg are looking to trade away a 22-23 year old defencemen looking for about 7 mil per year, and all they are asking in return is a 22-23 year old defencemen of the same quality as Trouba, looking to make about 4.5-5 mil per year?
(frank), i bet their phone's ringing off the hook. |
|
Mike Augello
Commissioner Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Buffalo, NY Joined: 06.25.2006
|
|
|
BorjeFan4Ever
Season Ticket Holder |
|
|
Location: not the BigSmoke anymore Joined: 10.29.2007
|
|
|
The whole premise of the article is based on this pearl of wisdom:
"Toronto doesn’t have a right-hand shooting defender capable of playing top-four minutes in their system. "
Zaitsev seemed to do ok on Russian's National team playing top 2 minutes. - gravyface
which genius came up with that evaluation....
no need to answer - rhetorical. |
|