3-3

Does LE mean Loui Eriksson?? Cus he's only missed 20 games over the last 8 seasons - what do you think "frequently" means?

in terms of Gudbranson I think is definitely a player to be excited about - he brings size/strength to the D that we lack.
- Brooks_Light

Correct. I have a feeling I was mistaken his past injuries for someone else. Could have sworn the dude was made of glass. My bad.

3-3
- Retinalz

Nice, patient comeback by the Swedes after they got buried at the beginning of the game. Maybe there's something to be said for experience after all...

Sweden just needs one point to advance.

Nice, patient comeback by the Swedes after they got buried at the beginning of the game. Maybe there's something to be said for experience after all...

Sweden just needs one point to advance.
- Carol Schram

Hopefully Sedin line can connect and put NA away...

Nice, patient comeback by the Swedes after they got buried at the beginning of the game. Maybe there's something to be said for experience after all...

Sweden just needs one point to advance.
- Carol Schram

I thought 2-0 advances?

I thought 2-0 advances?
- Retinalz

If NA won in reg and Russia beats fins there would be 3 two win teams

Wow ...just wow

Wow ...just wow
- Redmile247

Yep. That 3-on-3 was UNREAL.

Daniel foiled on a breakaway at one end, then an unbelievable move by MacKinnon in front of Lundqvist for the winner.

Swedes advance; kids stay alive. Now it's up to Russia tomorrow against the Finns to determine who's the second team.

this sucks..

that was the sickest OT i've ever seen

Russia has to win in regulation...

that was the sickest OT i've ever seen
- Brooks_Light

it would have been pretty good if Sedin had scored... then it would have been great. but now it kinda sucks cuz the Swedes lost.

it would have been pretty good if Sedin had scored... then it would have been great. but now it kinda sucks cuz the Swedes lost.
- kaptaan

I thot that this tourney was a joke??? and you'd rather invest in Enron stocks? and that anyone who watched it was an idiot loser??

Russia has to win in regulation...
- kaptaan

Why do you hate them so much? that was exciting as (frank). Canada vs Sweden or North America would be a great game..

I just realized I was one of the few here cheering for Sweden. I also want team Europe

Sorry I am not cheering for Canada or team NA.

True to the Canucks

Yep. That 3-on-3 was UNREAL.

Daniel foiled on a breakaway at one end, then an unbelievable move by MacKinnon in front of Lundqvist for the winner.

Swedes advance; kids stay alive. Now it's up to Russia tomorrow against the Finns to determine who's the second team.
- Carol Schram

I just realized I was one of the few here cheering for Sweden. I also want team Europe

Sorry I am not cheering for Canada or team NA.

True to the Canucks
- VANTEL

I was cheering for Sweden but that was AWESOME hockey!
Incredible overtime!!

I need another jazz cigarette after that.

it would have been pretty good if Sedin had scored... then it would have been great. but now it kinda sucks cuz the Swedes lost.
- kaptaan

It would have been amazing you're right - i was actually cheering both ways, it was way too exciting to contain. Both teams moving on so thats awesome.

it would have been pretty good if Sedin had scored... then it would have been great. but now it kinda sucks cuz the Swedes lost.
- kaptaan

They already won by going to overtime

The outcome in overtime didn't matter to them

I thot that this tourney was a joke??? and you'd rather invest in Enron stocks? and that anyone who watched it was an idiot loser??
- Brooks_Light

I am enjoying what I have seenI like hockey. I watched other shows like Ted Dansons new ( horrible ) show while Canada was playing and tonight will be watching Survivor Big Brother finale , and Designated Survivor and not watching Team Canada. I still want Sweden to winso I still think the tournament is just ok .

Russia has to win in regulation...
- kaptaan

No ...win and Russia is in lose and NA is

I was cheering for Sweden but that was AWESOME hockey!
Incredible overtime!!

I need another jazz cigarette after that.
- Marwood

It was exciting but I have to admit I fell asleep for most of the third , but I blame old age over the quality of the game

Yep. That 3-on-3 was UNREAL.

Daniel foiled on a breakaway at one end, then an unbelievable move by MacKinnon in front of Lundqvist for the winner.

Swedes advance; kids stay alive. Now it's up to Russia tomorrow against the Finns to determine who's the second team.
- Carol Schram

The Lundqvist save on Connor was pretty good as well

If I had to pick a scenario being NA I think this isn't too bad ...the Finns are probably one of the only teams that would be out of it and still play hard and the Russians are proned to choke in winnable spots

The Lundqvist save on Connor was pretty good as well

If I had to pick a scenario being NA I think this isn't too bad ...the Finns are probably one of the only teams that would be out of it and still play hard and the Russians are proned to choke in winnable spots
- Redmile247

I haven't been paying attention, if Rus wins will it come down to goal differential then?

I was cheering for Sweden but that was AWESOME hockey!
Incredible overtime!!

I need another jazz cigarette after that.
- Marwood

I just wanted Sweden to be guaranteed a semifinal spot. Wasn't too worried about the final outcome, and I don't think the Sedins were either when they blew the zone to leave MacKinnon all alone in front of Lundqvist. They were thinking offense.

I'm OK either way with whichever other team advances from Group B. Team North America is fun to watch, but the Russians have had such a rough ride lately in international competition. I'd be OK with having them in the mix.

I am also cheering for Europe - because of their underdog status and the Canucks connections. But I also like Canada. So my three teams are all in.