never, means reopening the constitution and would require the unanimous consent of every province. Quebec is against that to start
- Symba007

This makes no sense

When politicians have no more friends they want to give state money to.
- BashCH

Who the (frank) is friends with Patrick Brazeau

This makes no sense
- Fredo

every province position
http://www.theglobeandmai...e-reform/article15433168/

WHAT THE PROVINCES SAY

British Columbia: Term limits, elections and Senate abolition require provincial support and fall under the “7/50” formula. Ottawa can repeal the property qualification.

Alberta: Term limits and abolition require provincial consultation under the “7/50” rule. Ottawa can establish elections (Alberta already holds consultative votes for Senate nominees). No position on the property question.

Saskatchewan: Ottawa can impose term limits, but only if they are 10 years or more. Ottawa can establish elections and repeal the property qualification. Senate abolition requires the “7/50” rule.

Manitoba: Term limits and elections require provincial consultation under the “7/50” rule. Senate abolition requires unanimous consent from the provinces. Ottawa can repeal the property qualification.

Ontario: Ottawa can impose term limits, but only if they are nine years or more. The “7/50” rule applies for elections. Senate abolition needs unanimous consent from the provinces. Ottawa can repeal the property qualification.

Quebec: Term limits and elections fall under the “7/50” rule, while abolition would require unanimous support. Quebec’s senators have a slightly different property requirement, which Quebec and Ottawa could agree to do away with.

New Brunswick: Term limits and elections require consultation with the provinces, and Senate abolition requires unanimity. Ottawa can repeal the property qualification.

Prince Edward Island: Term limits and elections require provincial consultation. Ottawa can repeal the property qualification. No current procedure would allow for abolishing the Senate, though at a minimum a change would require unanimous consent of the provinces.

Nova Scotia: Term limits and elections require provincial consultation. Senate abolition requires unanimity of the provinces. Ottawa can repeal the property qualification.

Newfoundland and Labrador: Term limits and elections follow the “7/50” rule. Senate abolition requires unanimous provincial approval. No position on the property qualification.

Who the (frank) is friends with Patrick Brazeau
- Fredo

Harper was, he gave him the job

Who the (frank) is friends with Patrick Brazeau
- Fredo

He's a native, politicians need to pretend they like those guys...it comes with the job.

He's a native, politicians need to pretend they like those guys...it comes with the job.
- BashCH

never, means reopening the constitution and would require the unanimous consent of every province. Quebec is against that to start
- Symba007

Yes well Quebec never signed the god damn constitution... reopening the constitution will also reopen old wounds for sure.

Yes well Quebec never signed the god damn constitution... reopening the constitution will also reopen old wounds for sure.
- Scabeh

Exactly...plus other provinces will take advantage of it to request their own stuff.

Exactly...plus other provinces will take advantage of it to request their own stuff.
- Symba007

Like?

Like?
- pete26

Laser guided turbo sharks

Laser guided turbo sharks
- Fredo

those are pretty cool.

Laser guided turbo sharks
- Fredo

Always wanted one of those.

those are pretty cool.
- Gramps28

You guys should open the 2nd amendement to include those

Always wanted one of those.
- pete26

And you think PEI doesnt?

Always wanted one of those.
- pete26

id settle for ill tempered sea bass

He's a native, politicians need to pretend they like those guys...it comes with the job.
- BashCH

You guys should open the 2nd amendement to include those
- Fredo

shows what you know about the 2nd Amendment. its allowed.

shows what you know about the 2nd Amendment. its allowed.
- Gramps28

shows what you know about the 2nd Amendment. its allowed.
- Gramps28

id settle for ill tempered sea bass
- DoubleDown

I'd settle for some blackened chilean sea bass.

Is that too racist?

BINGO!?

I'd settle for some blackened chilean sea bass.

Is that too racist?

BINGO!?
- pete26

You know that seabass will be immature and piss off the other bass.

I'd settle for some blackened chilean sea bass.

Is that too racist?

BINGO!?
- pete26

#triggered

yeah he should at least get to pop his pallet fire cherry
- DoubleDown

Adam.

I like having fires. It's relaxing. I can sit outside, have a beer, talk to my wife, talk to the neighbors that drop over once in a while, not have to worry about driving, and not spend a couple of hundred dollars at some fancy restaurant.

Basically what I'm trying to say is "Go (frank) yourself! Friendship OVER!"

I'd settle for some blackened chilean sea bass.

Is that too racist?

BINGO!?
- pete26

You know that seabass will be immature and piss off the other bass.
- Fredo