Ok Friend, lol.

I am a hockey fan first and foremost, but at the same time a writer should be accountable. At no time have I been rude or have a said something that wasn't the truth.

If Tanner wanted to explain his complete 360 on DeAngelo, then it would have been fine. Instead he keeps misrepresenting what he said in his last blog.

If somebody is going to write, especially on the Internet, they should be able to answer a simple question about the inconsistencies in their writing. And if they cannot take a simple question, then maybe a faceless blog site isn't the thing for them.

As mentioned repeatedly, I have no issue with Tanner personally, not in the least....so James, just tell us how you changed your mind so drastically from one day to the next with no additional information.

Ok Friend, lol.

I am a hockey fan first and foremost, but at the same time a writer should be accountable. At no time have I been rude or have a said something that wasn't the truth.

If Tanner wanted to explain his complete 360 on DeAngelo, then it would have been fine. Instead he keeps misrepresenting what he said in his last blog.

If somebody is going to write, especially on the Internet, they should be able to answer a simple question about the inconsistencies in their writing. And if they cannot take a simple question, then maybe a faceless blog site isn't the thing for them.

As mentioned repeatedly, I have no issue with Tanner personally, not in the least....so James, just tell us how you changed your mind so drastically from one day to the next with no additional information.
- Dollars2Donuts

Ok Friend, lol.

I am a hockey fan first and foremost, but at the same time a writer should be accountable. At no time have I been rude or have a said something that wasn't the truth.

If Tanner wanted to explain his complete 360 on DeAngelo, then it would have been fine. Instead he keeps misrepresenting what he said in his last blog.

If somebody is going to write, especially on the Internet, they should be able to answer a simple question about the inconsistencies in their writing. And if they cannot take a simple question, then maybe a faceless blog site isn't the thing for them.

As mentioned repeatedly, I have no issue with Tanner personally, not in the least....so James, just tell us how you changed your mind so drastically from one day to the next with no additional information.
- Dollars2Donuts

Heres what I wrote

"Murphy and Stone could be trade-bait.

Both are young and right-handed enough that they should create some interest on the market and bring back something interesting. An opening night roster of:

OEL - Schenn
Goligoski - Dangelo
Chychrun - Michalek

might actually be much better than it appears."

This was followed by the immediate signing of both players I suggested trading.

In your original post you refered to this as me saying Deangelo was a lock to make the team on the second pairing, and demanded some kind of explanation. You also accused me of flip flopping and not putting any thought into my articles.

But then repeatedly wondered why you didn't get an honest response. Go figure.

As you can clearly see from reading my original quote, I have nothing to explain.

So today I learn that the Dark Tower books by Mr.King should be hitting theatres in Feb 2017. Great news. I also learn some jabroni is one of the main characters. Another is Matthew Mccaugney (sp?). Guess which is Roland and which is the man in black.

So excited. So pissed.

So today I learn that the Dark Tower books by Mr.King should be hitting theatres in Feb 2017. Great news. I also learn some jabroni is one of the main characters. Another is Matthew Mccaugney (sp?). Guess which is Roland and which is the man in black.

So excited. So pissed.
- systemtool

If by "jabroni" you mean Idris Elba, a massive star. Then yeah, sure, he's a jabroni.

what team wouldnt like to bring in a top pairing dman?

would the coyotes be willing to move Domi+ or Strome + to grab one though?

Ok Friend, lol.

I am a hockey fan first and foremost, but at the same time a writer should be accountable. At no time have I been rude or have a said something that wasn't the truth.

If Tanner wanted to explain his complete 360 on DeAngelo, then it would have been fine. Instead he keeps misrepresenting what he said in his last blog.

If somebody is going to write, especially on the Internet, they should be able to answer a simple question about the inconsistencies in their writing. And if they cannot take a simple question, then maybe a faceless blog site isn't the thing for them.

As mentioned repeatedly, I have no issue with Tanner personally, not in the least....so James, just tell us how you changed your mind so drastically from one day to the next with no additional information.
- Dollars2Donuts

A complete 360° would leave him facing the same direction as when he started.

If by "jabroni" you mean Idris Elba, a massive star. Then yeah, sure, he's a jabroni.
- Wetbandit1

Yup. That nobody.

So today I learn that the Dark Tower books by Mr.King should be hitting theatres in Feb 2017. Great news. I also learn some jabroni is one of the main characters. Another is Matthew Mccaugney (sp?). Guess which is Roland and which is the man in black.

So excited. So pissed.
- systemtool

Wow ! You must have had a rough week when you found out the Ghostbusters were all gonna be chicks.

Wow ! You must have had a rough week when you found out the Ghostbusters were all gonna be chicks.
- James_Tanner

Actually I loved it. I'm a huge SNL fan. Perfect cast. Love all 4 choices for the chicks. Pissed me off though that Jones had to deal with all those people hating in her. She's hilarious. Almost saw it yesterday but finding dory was more appropriate for my 4 1/2 year old.

I'm a massive Dark Tower/ King fan. I'm not normally picky about casting. This one is an exception for me.

A complete 360° would leave him facing the same direction as when he started.
- Atomic Wedgie

Im dizzy!