Cruel trick by the hotstove using the same jersey as Bill does.
- TobyFlenderson

I know!

I read that post and was completely confused.

It all depends on whether or not you prefer using Crisco or you cut corners using a non-stick spray.
- jmatchett383

Are you trying pull me into another argument just so you can blame me for how thing escalate? I understand acting like this at a party but basically being a hockeybuzz tryhard 12 hours a day, I don't understand.

Are you trying pull me into another argument just so you can blame me for how thing escalate? I understand acting like this at a party but basically being a hockeybuzz tryhard 12 hours a day, I don't understand.
- roenick97

No, Abraham Lincoln was a much better president that John Adams.

No, I'm arguing that I don't agree with your opinion that Hextall feels differently about Schenn, and that your opinion is not supported by any facts. I've repeatedly stated , multiple times, that in my opinion, how the contract played out has zero bearing on how Hextall feels about Schenn. So I'm puzzled why you keep stating that I don't understand your point.

Now it's time for me to move on from this specific discussion.
- MJL

thank you

I know!

I read that post and was completely confused.
- johndewar

They changed it!

hot stove must be a democrat

Sounds about right. Good chance he will be playing in Vegas come 17-18

- BiggE

Well if he plays 14 games he meets the criteria for a guy they'll need to expose. If I was Vegas I would probably be more likely to claim Read or whomever ends up unprotected out of the Laughton, Cousins, Raffl, Wiese foursome

Well if he plays 14 games he meets the criteria for a guy they'll need to expose. If I was Vegas I would probably be more likely to claim Read or whomever ends up unprotected out of the Laughton, Cousins, Raffl, Wiese foursome
- Jsaquella

Right. He may not get claimed, but he'll definitely meet the exposure criteria so that they can protect Gudas.

Well if he plays 14 games he meets the criteria for a guy they'll need to expose. If I was Vegas I would probably be more likely to claim Read or whomever ends up unprotected out of the Laughton, Cousins, Raffl, Wiese foursome
- Jsaquella

Would you rather protect Laughton or Cousins?

Would you rather protect Laughton or Cousins?
- PhillySportsGuy

I'd rather keep Laughton. I think he has a higher upside. But this season could be a big decider for him. I don't need 30 goals, but a healthy season of 15/22/37 where his "2-way" play comes around would be nice.

Would you rather protect Laughton or Cousins?
- PhillySportsGuy

i lean Laughton, because I think he has a higher ceiling.

Right. He may not get claimed, but he'll definitely meet the exposure criteria so that they can protect Gudas.
- jmatchett383

I'd rather keep Laughton. I think he has a higher upside. But this season could be a big decider for him. I don't need 30 goals, but a healthy season of 15/22/37 where his "2-way" play comes around would be nice.
- jmatchett383

Agreed. Losing Cousins would leave them pretty weak at Center though. I see Laughton as a winger from this point on. If Konecny breaks through, I could see them moving Raffl to 3C.

Agreed. Losing Cousins would leave them pretty weak at Center though. I see Laughton as a winger from this point on. If Konecny breaks through, I could see them moving Raffl to 3C.
- PhillySportsGuy

That's a year from now. It wouldn't be that difficult to find a replacement for Cousins.