Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks Qualifying Offers Expire Friday, Trading for a Winger
Author Message
storm88
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Surrey, BC
Joined: 09.29.2011

Jul 17 @ 11:41 AM ET
That deal made JB look like a fecking genius.
- VanHockeyGuy


Totally.


Kane's problems aren't what JB looks for (or really any GM you would think). Just wouldn't make sense moving JV in a trade for Kane. JV is a younger cheaper version. Not there yet pts wise tho. But doesn't make any sense to me. Stay the course with your youth.
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Jul 17 @ 11:45 AM ET
Oops a brain fart.
Fix my D combos pls ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ‘

Edler EG
Hutton Tanev
Tryamkin Juolevi
Brisebois

- Nighthawk

You want a id developing to not play hockey for a season? He isn't ready. Also we have Larson. I think Juolevi needs 1 more year in juniors.
thundachunk
Location: Help
Joined: 12.31.2011

Jul 17 @ 11:47 AM ET
He wouldn't be part of a kane deal but he could be part of a Landeskog or B Schenn trade
- VANTEL

I have little interest in Schenn. He is not that good imo. Though all 3 have similar numbers. I feel Kane and Landeskog both could be 30 to 35 goal scorers consistently.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 11:48 AM ET
You want a id developing to not play hockey for a season? He isn't ready. Also we have Larson. I think Juolevi needs 1 more year in juniors.
- Retinalz

Isn't that his 2022 line up?
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Jul 17 @ 11:50 AM ET
A name haven't heard yet is Chris Krieder. He's the type of player Van is looking for. Brings lots of speed too.
- manvanfan

IDK if we can afford him.
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Jul 17 @ 11:51 AM ET
Kane for burros, sbisa, and virtanen.
- kaptaan

Just stop posting.
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Jul 17 @ 11:56 AM ET
Isn't that his 2022 line up?
- VANTEL

Edler in 2022?
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 11:58 AM ET
I have little interest in Schenn. He is not that good imo. Though all 3 have similar numbers. I feel Kane and Landeskog both could be 30 to 35 goal scorers consistently.
- thundachunk



Kane and Schenn would be an upgrade over Sven. Landeskog would be my choice.

Someone mentioned yesterday about Eriksson playing with Sutter and some turned it down quickly. Ideally if Hansen Sedin Sedin could repeat those numbers 60 goals then you could start to develop a six year relationship with Bo and Eriksson. Adding Landeskog would be ideal . It would damn well cost but 6 years of Landy Bo and Eriksson . When the twins do depart there is your new first line
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:00 PM ET
Edler in 2022?
- Retinalz

You know how hard it is to move players on this team
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.31.2015

Jul 17 @ 12:02 PM ET
You know how hard it is to move players on this team
- VANTEL

His contract expires before then. I hope we do not resign him. Juolevi will be a better option at that point.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:03 PM ET
His contract expires before then. I hope we do not resign him. Juolevi will be a better option at that point.
- Retinalz

I am sure he will be gone
thundachunk
Location: Help
Joined: 12.31.2011

Jul 17 @ 12:04 PM ET
Kane and Schenn would be an upgrade over Sven. Landeskog would be my choice.

Someone mentioned yesterday about Eriksson playing with Sutter and some turned it down quickly. Ideally if Hansen Sedin Sedin could repeat those numbers 60 goals then you could start to develop a six year relationship with Bo and Eriksson. Adding Landeskog would be ideal . It would damn well cost but 6 years of Landy Bo and Eriksson . When the twins do depart there is your new first line

- VANTEL

That was me and everyone got their panties in a knot.

Landeskog should be everyones choice. If not they are not right in the head.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:06 PM ET
That was me and everyone got their panties in a knot.

Landeskog should be everyones choice. If not they are not right in the head.

- thundachunk

It would cost a first and either JV Hutton or Boeser
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:11 PM ET
You want a id developing to not play hockey for a season? He isn't ready. Also we have Larson. I think Juolevi needs 1 more year in juniors.
- Retinalz

That's his 2018-2019 line-up.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:18 PM ET
Some more police officers killed in Baton Rouge this morning
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:24 PM ET
Kilorn 7 yrs 31.15 mil . Sorry Belcher
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:28 PM ET
Some more police officers killed in Baton Rouge this morning
- VANTEL

It's an ugly world right now. Very depressing.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 12:31 PM ET
It's an ugly world right now. Very depressing.
- Marwood

Yup crazy
Makita
Referee
Vancouver Canucks
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC
Joined: 02.16.2007

Jul 17 @ 12:32 PM ET
That was me and everyone got their panties in a knot.

Landeskog should be everyones choice. If not they are not right in the head.

- thundachunk


With a statement like that, why settle with Landeskog? Lets go for Duchene, who cares what the cost. And when we still haven't won the cup, we could trade all those guys for our prospects that another team develops.

Developing your own prospects is overrated, if you don't believe that you're not right in the head...
thundachunk
Location: Help
Joined: 12.31.2011

Jul 17 @ 12:36 PM ET
With a statement like that, why settle with Landeskog? Lets go for Duchene, who cares what the cost. And when we still haven't won the cup, we could trade all those guys for our prospects that another team develops.

Developing your own prospects is overrated, if you don't believe that you're not right in the head...

- Makita

You're right on both counts.
Makita
Referee
Vancouver Canucks
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC
Joined: 02.16.2007

Jul 17 @ 12:43 PM ET
You're right on both counts.
- thundachunk


Smartass
VanHockeyGuy
Location: โ€œWho are we to think weโ€™re anybody?โ€ - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Jul 17 @ 12:44 PM ET
It would cost a first and either JV Hutton or Boeser
- VANTEL


We should know in about a month.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Jul 17 @ 1:06 PM ET
That was me and everyone got their panties in a knot.

Landeskog should be everyones choice. If not they are not right in the head.

- thundachunk

I would rather see eriksson play with the Sedin's, I don't think Hansen could ever put up 60 or 70 even playing with the sedin's.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jul 17 @ 1:06 PM ET
With a statement like that, why settle with Landeskog? Lets go for Duchene, who cares what the cost. And when we still haven't won the cup, we could trade all those guys for our prospects that another team develops.

Developing your own prospects is overrated, if you don't believe that you're not right in the head...

- Makita

Every team makes trades to improve.
VanHockeyGuy
Location: โ€œWho are we to think weโ€™re anybody?โ€ - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Jul 17 @ 1:12 PM ET
From James Tanners blog. LMAO

"And thanks to my Mom for keeping the A.C blasting in the basement"
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next