6m per for Eriksson means no revolving door with the Sedins.
Only if Eriksson needs a breather.
If Burrows finds his offense why bump him up?
Makes no sense promoting him away from success.
I expect more juggling on Sutters line.
6m per for Eriksson means no revolving door with the Sedins.
Only if Eriksson needs a breather.
If Burrows finds his offense why bump him up?
Makes no sense promoting him away from success.
I expect more juggling on Sutters line. - Nighthawk
The Sedin line will probably be pretty well set, although there are alternatives if it goes in a prolonged slump or they need to spread the scoring out. The rest of the lines will probably be pretty fluid throughout the season.
The Sedin line will probably be pretty well set, although there are alternatives if it goes in a prolonged slump or they need to spread the scoring out. The rest of the lines will probably be pretty fluid throughout the season. - CubanBuffet
If the past couple years show that if the Sedins have a good partner it helps the rest of the team over trying to split up the scoring.
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
Jul 17 @ 10:29 AM ET
Seems awful similar to the 1st one - dbot
Rogue One has the potential to be very good if they go off their own formula and not just copycat a New Hope like Force Awakens did. Opportunity to re-introduce Vader (but not too much) and develop some other characters into the fold. I was mildly disappointed with Force Awakens and thought Abrams missed a lot of opportunity with the film…hoping it is different now that Abrams is off it.
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
Jul 17 @ 10:41 AM ET
They will compete by having depth to deal with injuries. - VanHockeyGuy
I hear you but do we actually have the depth to get through a massive injury bug around Jan-Feb? I don't see where the depth is.
2/3 past seasons injuries have killed us by mid season.
If JB can acquire that 20 goal LW he is looking for then I will say we have some depth.
But right now if you remove any 2 of our top 6 forwards and 2 of our bottom 6 forwards... plus maybe 2 dmen all injured at the same time I'm not sure where the depth is. There is some in Utica but enough to keep us competing for the WC?
We are still pretty thin outside of our top 6 forwards and top 2 D. But I do think an addition of a new winger will help for sure. But it will most likely come via trade where we won't actually be adding depth just swapping players.
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
Jul 17 @ 10:57 AM ET
I hear you but do we actually have the depth to get through a massive injury bug around Jan-Feb? I don't see where the depth is.
2/3 past seasons injuries have killed us by mid season.
If JB can acquire that 20 goal LW he is looking for then I will say we have some depth.
But right now if you remove any 2 of our top 6 forwards and 2 of our bottom 6 forwards... plus maybe 2 dmen all injured at the same time I'm not sure where the depth is. There is some in Utica but enough to keep us competing for the WC?
We are still pretty thin outside of our top 6 forwards and top 2 D. But I do think an addition of a new winger will help for sure. But it will most likely come via trade where we won't actually be adding depth just swapping players. - LordHumungous
I don't have huge aspirations for the team this season, i think they will be a lottery team again. I do however see them being better than last year. Injuries are inevitable, how the team adapts and who steps up is the real question?
