YuenglingJagr
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: under the bridge Joined: 10.05.2015
|
|
|
The high AHL salary could help if they try and put him through waivers. - MJL
another team cant claim him to play him in the AHL...theyd claim him to be on their NHL roster |
|
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Candyland, PA Joined: 09.20.2007
|
|
|
another team cant claim him to play him in the AHL...theyd claim him to be on their NHL roster - YuenglingJagr
No kidding! Misses the point of the AHL salary acting as a deterrent. Another team can certainly claim him, and then place him through waivers, to try and send him to the AHL. |
|
YuenglingJagr
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: under the bridge Joined: 10.05.2015
|
|
|
No kidding! Misses the point of the AHL salary acting as a deterrent. Another team can certainly claim him, and then place him through waivers, to try and send him to the AHL. - MJL
that makes no sense...because the Flyers could just take him back and put him in the AHL |
|
jmatchett383
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Newark, DE Joined: 03.09.2010
|
|
|
that makes no sense...because the Flyers could just take him back and put him in the AHL - YuenglingJagr
Wouldn't the Flyers have to do the same thing, and we'd keep having this yo-yo effect taking place? |
|
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Candyland, PA Joined: 09.20.2007
|
|
|
that makes no sense...because the Flyers could just take him back and put him in the AHL - YuenglingJagr
It makes perfect sense. That's how it works. I think there are rules in place for re-claiming a player you just placed on waivers. Coming out of training camp, every player that is not waiver exempt, needs to be sent through waivers to be re-assigned from the NHL camp, to the AHL. |
|
YuenglingJagr
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: under the bridge Joined: 10.05.2015
|
|
|
Wouldn't the Flyers have to do the same thing, and we'd keep having this yo-yo effect taking place? - jmatchett383
If the Flyers put him on waivers to assign him to the AHL and another team claims him, he becomes a part of their NHL roster. If they want to put him on waivers to send him to the AHL, the Flyers could claim him and immediately assign him to the AHL. (team that originally waived him)
His AHL salary has almost no bearing on whether or not he would get claimed |
|
jmatchett383
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Newark, DE Joined: 03.09.2010
|
|
|
I'd never tell anyone they can't take part in a rodeo or be a bullfighter...but I'm also not shocked when they get killed doing it. |
|
jmatchett383
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Newark, DE Joined: 03.09.2010
|
|
|
If the Flyers put him on waivers to assign him to the AHL and another team claims him, he becomes a part of their NHL roster. If they want to put him on waivers to send him to the AHL, the Flyers could claim him and immediately assign him to the AHL.
His AHL salary has almost no bearing on whether or not he would get claimed - YuenglingJagr
Why would the Flyers not need to put him through waivers when they reclaim him (assuming a second team does not claim him first after the first team that claimed him puts him on waivers)? |
|
YuenglingJagr
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: under the bridge Joined: 10.05.2015
|
|
|
Why would the Flyers not need to put him through waivers when they reclaim him (assuming a second team does not claim him first after the first team that claimed him puts him on waivers)? - jmatchett383
They waived him for the purpose of putting him in the AHL...the reason for that is just as much for the players as it is for teams. A guy like him who could play in the NHL could get claimed by a team who wants him in the NHL. It is not meant for other teams to get a guy for nothing just to stash him in the AHL. If he has a chance to play in the NHL, it lets him. If hes going to be assigned to the AHL, the Flyers retain his rights.
In some ways it is like the Rule 5 draft. You are taking a player from another team, but only if you actually have a spot for them |
|
mayorofangrytown
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Downingtown, PA Joined: 08.16.2006
|
|
|
Why would the Flyers not need to put him through waivers when they reclaim him (assuming a second team does not claim him first after the first team that claimed him puts him on waivers)? - jmatchett383
Third base! |
|
jmatchett383
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Newark, DE Joined: 03.09.2010
|
|
|
They waived him for the purpose of putting him in the AHL...the reason for that is just as much for the players as it is for teams. A guy like him who could play in the NHL could get claimed by a team who wants him in the NHL. It is not meant for other teams to get a guy for nothing just to stash him in the AHL. If he has a chance to play in the NHL, it lets him. If hes going to be assigned to the AHL, the Flyers retain his rights.
In some ways it is like the Rule 5 draft. You are taking a player from another team, but only if you actually have a spot for them - YuenglingJagr
So there is a rule that, if a player is waived by Team A, gets claimed by Team B, then gets waived by Team B and reclaimed by Team A, Team A can assign him to the AHL without have to waive him again? That seems like a possibility for some shady goings-on. |
|
jmatchett383
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Newark, DE Joined: 03.09.2010
|
|
|
Third base! - mayorofangrytown
Leave what you did last Friday night out of here! |
|
Jsaquella
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Bringing Hexy Back Joined: 06.16.2006
|
|
|
Yes, in cases like Weal, waivers protect the player. If a guy can be in the NHL-like Chris Porter from last year-most would rather do so. The risk of guys like Miele, Brennan or O'Neill not clearing are low. They're not going to take a NHL slot from a more qualified guy & unless there's a specific reason for taking one of them, most will clear.
Weal could get snagged, though. There's a reason neither LA or Philly risked waivers on him, despite him not playing much |
|
Jsaquella
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Bringing Hexy Back Joined: 06.16.2006
|
|
|
So there is a rule that, if a player is waived by Team A, gets claimed by Team B, then gets waived by Team B and reclaimed by Team A, Team A can assign him to the AHL without have to waive him again? That seems like a possibility for some shady goings-on. - jmatchett383
No a player has to clear waivers within 30 days to be assigned to the AHL. If he is claimed the new team must keep him in NHL. If they want to send him down he needs to go thru waivers again. |
|
jmatchett383
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Newark, DE Joined: 03.09.2010
|
|
|
No a player has to clear waivers within 30 days to be assigned to the AHL. If he is claimed the new team must keep him in NHL. If they want to send him down he needs to go thru waivers again. - Jsaquella
So let's say the Flyers waive him to send him to the AHL and he is claimed by Buffalo. Buffalo then decides to waive him to send him to the AHL and he is claimed by the Flyers. The Flyers would still have to waive him to send him to the AHL, correct? In that case, couldn't Buffalo and Philly keep waving and reclaiming him in a never-ending yo-yo effect? |
|
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Candyland, PA Joined: 09.20.2007
|
|
|
They waived him for the purpose of putting him in the AHL...the reason for that is just as much for the players as it is for teams. A guy like him who could play in the NHL could get claimed by a team who wants him in the NHL. It is not meant for other teams to get a guy for nothing just to stash him in the AHL. If he has a chance to play in the NHL, it lets him. If hes going to be assigned to the AHL, the Flyers retain his rights.
In some ways it is like the Rule 5 draft. You are taking a player from another team, but only if you actually have a spot for them - YuenglingJagr
You're correct in that a team claiming him, is doing so because they want him for their NHL team. What you're not considering, is that there is no guarantee that he remains there. So stating that his AHL salary has no bearing as a deterrent is not true. It does somewhat.
|
|
YuenglingJagr
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: under the bridge Joined: 10.05.2015
|
|
|
So there is a rule that, if a player is waived by Team A, gets claimed by Team B, then gets waived by Team B and reclaimed by Team A, Team A can assign him to the AHL without have to waive him again? That seems like a possibility for some shady goings-on. - jmatchett383
Not really because if another team wanted to claim him they could |
|
YuenglingJagr
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: under the bridge Joined: 10.05.2015
|
|
|
You're correct in that a team claiming him, is doing so because they want him for their NHL team. What you're not considering, is that there is no guarantee that he remains there. So stating that his AHL salary has no bearing as a deterrent is not true. It does somewhat. - MJL
What you're not considering, is that you're wrong |
|
jmatchett383
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Newark, DE Joined: 03.09.2010
|
|
|
Not really because if another team wanted to claim him they could - YuenglingJagr
Right. So, after the Flyers theoretically reclaim him, they'd still have to put him through waivers to assign him to the AHL, at which point another team could claim him. |
|
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Candyland, PA Joined: 09.20.2007
|
|
|
So there is a rule that, if a player is waived by Team A, gets claimed by Team B, then gets waived by Team B and reclaimed by Team A, Team A can assign him to the AHL without have to waive him again? That seems like a possibility for some shady goings-on. - jmatchett383
I'm not positive, but I believe there is a rule in place to prevent a team from re-claiming a player they just placed on waivers.
What I think happens out of camp, is if a player is waived and claimed out of camp, 12 days before the start of the season, if no other team claimed the player, I think they can assign the player to the AHL. If other teams also claimed the player, then he has to be offered to the other teams first, who also made a claim, before they can send the player down. Same thing if they wanted to trade him. Not 100% about this, but that's how I think it works. |
|
|
|
I'd never tell anyone they can't take part in a rodeo or be a bullfighter...but I'm also not shocked when they get killed doing it. - jmatchett383
Killing bulls for sport and to entertain people is barbaric. I have zero remorse for any of these fools who are matadors. Mess with the bull, and you get the horns. |
|
jmatchett383
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Newark, DE Joined: 03.09.2010
|
|
|
What you're not considering, is that you're wrong - YuenglingJagr
What you're not considering is that MJL stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night. I think you need to stand down. |
|
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Candyland, PA Joined: 09.20.2007
|
|
|
What you're not considering, is that you're wrong - YuenglingJagr
Prove it! |
|
johndewar
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: South Jersey, NJ Joined: 01.16.2009
|
|
|
johndewar
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: South Jersey, NJ Joined: 01.16.2009
|
|
|
Killing bulls for sport and to entertain people is barbaric. I have zero remorse for any of these fools who are matadors. Mess with the bull, and you get the horns. - PLindbergh31
|
|