Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: John Jaeckel: Awards And Rumors
Author Message
6628
Joined: 08.24.2009

Jun 23 @ 1:09 PM ET
Pound for pound Ladd is a vg fighter.
Also...Eager was a workout machine and when they took the military fitness test together Ladd won.

Bad ass means something different to everyone...Lucic is a meaner player and plays dirty if need be.

- Al


I hear ya. I understand the Ladd thing. He's more stable. From a fan's perspective he makes more sense. BUT, from a high level players perspective they probably would say we want both. Although if a choice had to be made they take Lucic first.
Ask the guys from years ago. In his prime you wanted Charley on your side. How many times did you see Manson come to the rescue back in the day. He made opposing players think twice.

Now I know it's not years ago, but ask Toews today and see what he says. It's still a tough game even though it's much faster.
golfbard
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: NY
Joined: 06.22.2007

Jun 23 @ 1:09 PM ET
Chris Kuc @ChrisKuc
In any Marcus Kruger trade talks, teams will likely ask #Blackhawks to retain some of center's salary.



Brian Hedger
@BrianHedger
Wonder if it comes down to Shaw or Kruger? As in, #Blackhawks tell Shaw: "Sign for this and we'll trade Kruger. Otherwise, we'll trade you."
93Joe
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Chicago, IL
Joined: 06.09.2015

Jun 23 @ 1:10 PM ET
I agree here-- sign Ladd AND Matt Martin for the same money as Lucic??
- jb3333

Please.
EnzoD
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Denver, CO
Joined: 02.19.2014

Jun 23 @ 1:10 PM ET
Yea, leave the adjective out. Vegas knights. Then everyone hears, vegas nights. It's all about the marketing.

GO MONEY

- hocktock


Or Vegas Blackout Knights? so many options. And like someone just said, Kings> Knights. Why not do the Las Vegas Aces as Aces > Kings..,.
EnzoD
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Denver, CO
Joined: 02.19.2014

Jun 23 @ 1:10 PM ET
Chris Kuc @ChrisKuc
In any Marcus Kruger trade talks, teams will likely ask #Blackhawks to retain some of center's salary.

- golfbard


So I guess his contract isn't market value after all?
hawkss81
Joined: 01.26.2013

Jun 23 @ 1:10 PM ET
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qBNukFUSPQ


Good times

- phantasmo


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2QtJ0wuCAM

EVEN BETTER TIMES
kwolf68
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Mt. Lebanon, PA
Joined: 12.18.2010

Jun 23 @ 1:10 PM ET
Chris Kuc @ChrisKuc
In any Marcus Kruger trade talks, teams will likely ask #Blackhawks to retain some of center's salary.

- golfbard


Here we go again...Schmaltz and Kruger for garbage and Hawks retain salary
jb3333
Chicago Blackhawks
Joined: 03.27.2013

Jun 23 @ 1:12 PM ET
I hear ya. I understand the Ladd thing. He's more stable. From a fan's perspective he makes more sense. BUT, from a high level players perspective they probably would say we want both. Although if a choice had to be made they take Lucic first.
Ask the guys from years ago. In his prime you wanted Charley on your side. How many times did you see Manson come to the rescue back in the day. He made opposing players think twice.

Now I know it's not years ago, but ask Toews today and see what he says. It's still a tough game even though it's much faster.

- 6628


Manson was feared---- Hawks usually had one (or three) true bad ass players-- again back in the day--
DirkGraham
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 11.02.2012

Jun 23 @ 1:12 PM ET
Or Vegas Blackout Knights? so many options. And like someone just said, Kings> Knights. Why not do the Las Vegas Aces as Aces > Kings..,.
- EnzoD



I prefer the Las Vegas All You Can Eat Steak and Lobster. Their first marketing move, acquire Big Buff.
6628
Joined: 08.24.2009

Jun 23 @ 1:13 PM ET
Better check with Kesler about Ladd--- I recall he dusted him one punch--
- jb3333


I was there and saw it. Nice one timer sure, but that was no rag doll job. But I wasn't talking about Kesler.
hocktock
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Over by dere.
Joined: 07.15.2015

Jun 23 @ 1:13 PM ET
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qBNukFUSPQ


Good times

- phantasmo



What a bonehead. His team up 3 to 0 and he picks a fight.

LOSER
JRoenick97
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Spokane, WA
Joined: 07.20.2012

Jun 23 @ 1:13 PM ET
So I guess his contract isn't market value after all?
- EnzoD

Anyone who thought it was was fooling themselves.
z1990z
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: NW USA
Joined: 02.09.2012

Jun 23 @ 1:17 PM ET
[quote=golfbard]Chris Kuc @ChrisKuc
In any Marcus Kruger trade talks, teams will likely ask #Blackhawks to retain some of center's salary.




Here is where McNeil gets thrown in..
Dabearshawks
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 03.02.2015

Jun 23 @ 1:17 PM ET
Crawford to Calgary for 2nd in 2016 + 3rd in 2017.

Shaw's rights to Buffalo for 2016 2nd + 2017 4th

Sign Lucic 4yrs x $5.75mil

Sign Campbell 1yr x $1.5mil


- EnzoD


Only issue I see here is Panarin not being extended.
Al
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: , IL
Joined: 08.11.2006

Jun 23 @ 1:17 PM ET
I hear ya. I understand the Ladd thing. He's more stable. From a fan's perspective he makes more sense. BUT, from a high level players perspective they probably would say we want both. Although if a choice had to be made they take Lucic first.
Ask the guys from years ago. In his prime you wanted Charley on your side. How many times did you see Manson come to the rescue back in the day. He made opposing players think twice.

Now I know it's not years ago, but ask Toews today and see what he says. It's still a tough game even though it's much faster.

- 6628


Agree on Manson and for same dough I pick Lucic. Issue for Ladd, if u can believe what has been out there is he passed on a big extension with the Jets...Like $5 mill + for 4/5 yrs...I think that ship has sailed for him.
DarthKane
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: 5.13.4.9
Joined: 02.23.2012

Jun 23 @ 1:18 PM ET
Chris Kuc @ChrisKuc
In any Marcus Kruger trade talks, teams will likely ask #Blackhawks to retain some of center's salary.



Brian Hedger
@BrianHedger
Wonder if it comes down to Shaw or Kruger? As in, #Blackhawks tell Shaw: "Sign for this and we'll trade Kruger. Otherwise, we'll trade you."

- golfbard



I'm sure they'll ask. But if it comes down to Trade Kruger (with salary retained) and re-sign Shaw or keep Kruger and trade Shaw then I ship Shaw out.
John Jaeckel
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: www.the-rink.com
Joined: 11.19.2006

Jun 23 @ 1:20 PM ET
Watch hawks and Calgary. They're talking.
golfbard
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: NY
Joined: 06.22.2007

Jun 23 @ 1:20 PM ET
[quote=golfbard]Chris Kuc @ChrisKuc
In any Marcus Kruger trade talks, teams will likely ask #Blackhawks to retain some of center's salary.




Here is where McNeil gets thrown in..

- z1990z



Of course, doesnt mean Stan will agree to it. Teams would be silly not to ask for that. It's all part of the negotiation process.
z1990z
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: NW USA
Joined: 02.09.2012

Jun 23 @ 1:20 PM ET
Watch hawks and Calgary. They're talking.
- John Jaeckel



Could this be a CC chat?? If so and Backlund is a target, then there is another C to backfill any loss of Shaw/Kruger. Of course Im prolly miles off.. again!
6628
Joined: 08.24.2009

Jun 23 @ 1:21 PM ET
Agree on Manson and for same dough I pick Lucic. Issue for Ladd, if u can believe what has been out there is he passed on a big extension with the Jets...Like $5 mill + for 4/5 yrs...I think that ship has sailed for him.
- Al


Have to believe you're right on with this.
hawkss81
Joined: 01.26.2013

Jun 23 @ 1:21 PM ET
Watch hawks and Calgary. They're talking.
- John Jaeckel


Always good especially if it's regarding kruger. They gave the hawks a 3rd for Bollig that makes Kruger worth at least a 2nd?
DarthKane
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: 5.13.4.9
Joined: 02.23.2012

Jun 23 @ 1:22 PM ET
Watch hawks and Calgary. They're talking.
- John Jaeckel



About?

McNeill?
SteveRain
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Connor Murphy Sucks, IL
Joined: 05.07.2010

Jun 23 @ 1:22 PM ET
So I guess his contract isn't market value after all?
- EnzoD


You and I knew that but many refused to look at a step away from the emotional connect that "Krooga" gives them. I like Kruger the player. I hate his deal, and especially hate it when the cap goes up a whopping 1+ million THIS year and more then lkely is FLAT next year at best.

So while many will sit here and bemoan it, from a ROI it's a smart move. Now the only reason he wont' be dealt iis because the return isn't suffice OR the RSA asked of the Hawks exceeds what they want to do. I would expect them to offset the latter with a sweetner, welcome Mr. McNeil.

In the end if I'm a NHL owner and a player I'm royally pissed off. The league has flat out lied regarding cap numbers and their predictions are way off. There aren't enough teams with ample budgets/cap space to sign guys to market deals and teams looking to dump bad deals have to throw in high sweetners to get it done.

A perfect storm of cap hell blowing up in Bettmnan's face and again.....Hawks will be right up against it next year and I think Bowman very well knows that and is trying to get AHEAD of the market giving up a lesser important piece in kruger vsCrawford or higher end core piece.

Could be totally off, but that IMO is what I get out of all this. And again...this very well could come down to shaw vs Kruger, both Q favories but who is more versatile should they need to fill ample holes in roster on the fly......
hawkeytalkman
Joined: 01.11.2016

Jun 23 @ 1:23 PM ET
About?

McNeill?

- DarthKane


About high performance arena urinal cakes

Rocky wants to make sure he is getting maximum value out of every cent
mrpaulish
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Itasca, IL
Joined: 01.18.2010

Jun 23 @ 1:24 PM ET
Watch hawks and Calgary. They're talking.
- John Jaeckel



Told ya those dummies would take McNeil !


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32  Next