Oh you want Drouin too? Now we are working up a block buster!

How about #6, #35, #66 and Backlund for Drouin & Bishop?
- The-O-G

Guys calm down! Lots of bishop to flames going around right now. Too expensive.... I wanna keep our 6th

Mason McDonald + Kylington + Ollas Mattsson

If you guys get bishop, I'm taking a hit out on him. Tonya Harding style

If you guys get bishop, I'm taking a hit out on him. Tonya Harding style
- Ihateallofu

Hahaha the poor Coilers......

I'm all for the Flames getting Bishop as long as I don't hear the words: Gaudreau, Monahan, Bennett, Brodie, Hamilton or the number 6!

Hahaha the poor Coilers......

I'm all for the Flames getting Bishop as long as I don't hear the words: Gaudreau, Monahan, Bennett, Brodie, Hamilton or the number 6!
- The-O-G

Agreed but it will hurt getting rid of Kyllinton or Rasmus both look like they could be studs. What about a 2017 1st

Agreed but it will hurt getting rid of Kyllinton or Rasmus both look like they could be studs. What about a 2017 1st
- bigbear89

NO

it's going to be a prospect and a couple 2nds. Sounds about right. Your 1st is too valuable. TBY needs cap space. However so does CGY. Somehow need to get Wideman off the books.
- storm88

Actually, Bishop's salary next year is actually not bad, similar to Fleury's. It'll be next year & by then Smid, Wideman, Raymond & Bollig are gone. So even if we pay Bishop 7.0 mill, it can be done.

http://www.tsn.ca/matthew...n-s-top-prospect-1.511597

Here's TSN's final list.....damn I wish we were in the top 5.

Imagine the Flames drafted Juolevi? Hahaha....our D core would be insane! It's almost worth it haha.

NO
- The-O-G

Why. It will be a late.one

Agreed but it will hurt getting rid of Kyllinton or Rasmus both look like they could be studs. What about a 2017 1st
- bigbear89

Actually, with Bishop at 5.95 mill & needing to be resigned to probably 7.0 mill next year, where does that leave Gilles? How about Hickey, #35 & #54 & Gilles for Bishop?
Yzerman loves having those high end seeds cultivating & Bishop replaces that potential in net.

This all could be a tactic to get Pitt to lower their price on Fleury. Honestly, Pitt owes us one for the Iggy trade

Actually, with Bishop at 5.95 mill & needing to be resigned to probably 7.0 mill next year, where does that leave Gilles? How about Hickey, #35 & #54 & Gilles for Bishop?
Yzerman loves having those high end seeds cultivating & Bishop replaces that potential in net.
- Kevin R

Sub out Gillies for Mason. I think that Gillies is the real deal.

it's going to be a prospect and a couple 2nds. Sounds about right. Your 1st is too valuable. TBY needs cap space. However so does CGY. Somehow need to get Wideman off the books.
- storm88

I am more than willing to let Flower go for a 2nd and either Poirier, Shinkaruk, or Klimchuk... leaning towards Poirier as my preferred from what I've read and heard from some Flames' fans saying.

Actually, with Bishop at 5.95 mill & needing to be resigned to probably 7.0 mill next year, where does that leave Gilles? How about Hickey, #35 & #54 & Gilles for Bishop?
Yzerman loves having those high end seeds cultivating & Bishop replaces that potential in net.
- Kevin R

Woah woah woah. Hold your fricken horses!!!!

How about Crawford instead? He has 4 more years @ $6M per.

I wouldn't want to trade Crawford, but the Hawks need to resign Panarin, possibly Shaw, and get another dman.

How about Crawford instead? He has 4 more years @ $6M per.

I wouldn't want to trade Crawford, but the Hawks need to resign Panarin, possibly Shaw, and get another dman.
- Dannyboy

For Wideman @ 1/2 salary.

BOOK IT

Hahaha the poor Coilers......

I'm all for the Flames getting Bishop as long as I don't hear the words: Gaudreau, Monahan, Bennett, Brodie, Hamilton or the number 6!
- The-O-G

Well then you probably won't be Getting him

How about Crawford instead? He has 4 more years @ $6M per.

I wouldn't want to trade Crawford, but the Hawks need to resign Panarin, possibly Shaw, and get another dman.
- Dannyboy

I am in the trade Crow camp personally

Michael Grosso ‏@RumorBreak · 29m29 minutes ago

*BREAKING*: Per source CGY has offered 2 2nd rounders + Backlund + prospects for Ben Bishop. Ball in TB's court. - fixed the typo.

This guy is decent. Doesn't really throw poop out there.

For Wideman @ 1/2 salary.

BOOK IT
- The-O-G

No thanks. Crawford is probably the best goalie "potentially" in the market. Anderson got 2 picks.

Michael Grosso ‏@RumorBreak · 29m29 minutes ago

*BREAKING*: Per source CGY has offered 2 2nd rounders + Backlund + prospects for Ben Bishop. Ball in TB's court. - fixed the typo.

This guy is decent. Doesn't really throw poop out there.
- Dannyboy

Pull the trigger!!!

How about Crawford instead? He has 4 more years @ $6M per.

I wouldn't want to trade Crawford, but the Hawks need to resign Panarin, possibly Shaw, and get another dman.
- Dannyboy

Never really thought of Crawford as a game changing goalie. He's played on great teams but is just a good goalie. in my opinion. Much like Luongo on team Canada, was he really that good to win the gold?

Michael Grosso ‏@RumorBreak · 29m29 minutes ago

*BREAKING*: Per source CGY has offered 2 2nd rounders + Backlund + prospects for Ben Bishop. Ball in TB's court. - fixed the typo.

This guy is decent. Doesn't really throw poop out there.
- Dannyboy

prospects is gonna be so good one day

Never really thought of Crawford as a game changing goalie. He's played on great teams but is just a good goalie. in my opinion. Much like Luongo on team Canada, was he really that good to win the gold?
- Flames in 6 04

Crawford was stellar in both runs


Actually thought tbay outplayed them for a chunk of last years final, but Crawford was great


This isn't an osgoods case. He's probably not elite, but really good nonetheless

Never really thought of Crawford as a game changing goalie. He's played on great teams but is just a good goalie. in my opinion. Much like Luongo on team Canada, was he really that good to win the gold?
- Flames in 6 04

he is better than you think, i think