Who's really trading away any top pair d-men though? Not saying Bogosian is your only choice, but I don't think teams are looking to push away their #1 or #2 guys anywhere.
- stashu

Which is why I think we will settle for Cam Fowler.

We just need to hope Risto turns out to be a true #1

I've thought about this too

Considering some of the great players he slags, and some of the mediocre ones he loves, it would go something like this;

Ok tanner you take gardiner, franson and kadri and I get weber, seabrook and Kesler
- Ihateallofu

Oh I forgot, he gets leddy and I get Keith too

I would love for Tanner to be a GM, I guarantee his team would finish bottom of the league.
- ImThatGuy

He'd trade for the best 2 dmen in the league other than OEL (no one, and I mean no one, is better than OEL), Jake Gardiner and Cody Franson.

Total number of games played divided by number of games in a season multiply that by his ppg.

It works out to 76 gp and 59 point for him
- dadeadhead

So u included the 48 game season instead of just simply extrapolating it to a regular 82 game season ? That skews the totals or misrepresents them anyways.


Anyways, all good

***** battles existential crisis ******
- Der Kaiser

When did this happen?

Tanner legitimately thinks Franson is a #2 on a good team, and that McCabe is awful.

Where's the nearest bridge?
- CaptainRivet

He's what my elementary teachers referred to as "Special"

When did this happen?
- CaptainRivet

So close on the heels of the whole down right nasty confusion, you have wounded me.

So u included the 48 game season instead of just simply extrapolating it to a regular 82 game season ? That skews the totals or misrepresents them anyways.


Anyways, all good
- Ihateallofu

No it doesn't because he played 48 of 48 games.

He's played 425 of 458 games. Divide it multiply by 82. It comes out to 76 games. Multiply that by his ppg and it comes to 59.

It's a true evaluation of games. You can't make the strike year an 82 game season as there to many factors. He played 48 of 48

69, 81, 80, 48, 78 = 356 gp in the nhl over the last 5 years

47, 63, 65, 37,76 = 288 pts

288/356 = 0.8 ppg

X 82


= 66

Which is why I think we will settle for Cam Fowler.

We just need to hope Risto turns out to be a true #1
- sbroads24

Or hope Chychrun isnt bogo


Chychrun, Fowler, Risto, McCabe in theory could be a decent group of 4

No it doesn't because he played 48 of 48 games.

He's played 425 of 458 games. Divide it multiply by 82. It comes out to 76 games. Multiply that by his ppg and it comes to 59.

It's a true evaluation of games. You can't make the strike year an 82 game season as there to many factors. He played 48 of 48
- dadeadhead

Well his lower totals are then skewed

Because you're including his 37 points in a 48 games season which obviously diminishes his totals when compared against and with totals in an 82 game season

He's scored at a .8 ppg over the last 5 years

Well his lower totals are then skewed

Because you're including his 37 points in a 48 games season which obviously diminishes his totals when compared against totals in an 82 game season

He's scored at a .8 ppg over the last 5 years
- Ihateallofu

So...comparable to Ennis then?

So...comparable to Ennis then?
- stashu

If ennis averages 65 per, then hell yeah

Or hope Chychrun isnt bogo


Chychrun, Fowler, Risto, McCabe in theory could be a decent group of 4
- Sabresfan-365

Agreed. I'd still like to add a speedy puck mover for the bottom pair. Hopefully that's Guhle.

If ennis averages 65 per, then hell yeah
- Ihateallofu

I don't even know, just bustin Vince's balls.

So close on the heels of the whole down right nasty confusion, you have wounded me.
- Der Kaiser

I do not understand old people lingo.

I don't even know, just bustin Vince's balls.
- stashu

Nah, it was well played

I have no idea ennis's ppg. I bet it ain't bad though. Talented player

I don't even know, just bustin Vince's balls.
- stashu

I'm calling a referee in here for this comment...

Agreed. I'd still like to add a speedy puck mover for the bottom pair. Hopefully that's Guhle.
- sbroads24

Correct me if I am wrong but isn't Nelson also pretty savvy with the puck on his stick? I don't know if either of them will become a "top PP QB" in the NHL caliber but I also don't think it is such a glaring hole that we trade away big pieces.

Well his lower totals are then skewed

Because you're including his 37 points in a 48 games season which obviously diminishes his totals when compared against and with totals in an 82 game season

He's scored at a .8 ppg over the last 5 years
- Ihateallofu

It doesn't diminish anything really.

His career ppg is .779. That includes 37 in 48.

His totals are his totals. Want better ones? Score more.

Nah, it was well played

I have no idea ennis's ppg. I bet it ain't bad though. Talented player
- Ihateallofu

Ennis is at a .6 ppg clip. Hall is at a .86 ppg clip

Nah, it was well played

I have no idea ennis's ppg. I bet it ain't bad though. Talented player
- Ihateallofu

Ennis is at a .6 ppg clip. Hall is at a .86 ppg clip

It doesn't diminish anything really.

His career ppg is .779. That includes 37 in 48.

His totals are his totals. Want better ones? Score more.
- dadeadhead

Well I always said over the last half decade.

So you're not only comparing apples and oranges by comparing totals in a 48 game season with and against ones in an 82, but you've even changed the parameters to include extra years altogether

As I've stated from the beginning, his ppg over the last 5 years in the Nhl is .8 ppg. Which averages out to 65 per year over a full season. I'm sorry if you don't like those facts. But I can't change them.

But you're more than welcome to change the parameters if u like. Maybe add in his numbers at the worlds? Or just pinpoint a 20 game stretch u few comfortable with?
Fine by me bruh!

It doesn't diminish anything really.

His career ppg is .779. That includes 37 in 48.

His totals are his totals. Want better ones? Score more.
- dadeadhead

That dude don't math so good.

Well I always said over the last half decade.

So you're not only using comparing apples and oranges by comparing totals in a 48 game season to ones in an 82, but you've even changed the parameters to extra years altogether

As I've stated, his ppg over the last 5 years in the Nhl is .8 ppg. Which averages out to 65 per year over a full season

But you're more than welcome to change the parameters if u like. Maybe add in his numbers at the worlds? Or just pinpoint a 20 game stretch u few comfortable with.
Fine by me bruh!
- Ihateallofu

This dude don't math so good.