What did I do again?

Did I make a joke about her gross, fake boobs?
- eichiefs9

I like my breasts organic not GMO.

I would stay away from both Martin and Okposo.

Martin: You are gonna be complaining about spending way too much money for a 4th line forward who gives you 14 points a year while spending over a hundred minutes in the penalty box. A career -46. He disappears in the playoffs. I would rather have Victor Stalberg on the 4th line at 750 grand a year. Martin is going to be a least twice that much. IMO, he just doesn't fit that slot on Broadway.

Okposo: Doesn't score enough with Tavares as his center. An awful defensive forward with a -60 for his career. Has averaged less than a hit per game for his NHL career which doesn't translate well to his supposed "power forward" tag.
Is not going to be worth the 6.5 to 7 million cap hit a year people are talking about. You can keep his Tavares-less 17 goals and 25 assists for that money.
- Downeaster

Don't want anything to do with KO

Martin I would sign for the right price, and if we didn't have Glass. Since we will have Glass, and some idiot will offer Martin 3 per, Its not going to happen anyway.

I like my breasts organic not GMO.
- MidnightMarauder

I've been married for 12 years, I'd take green alien tits at this point

I've been married for 12 years, I'd take green alien tits at this point
- jimbro83

- MidnightMarauder

cat tits I got a lot of

How crazy would it be if the Rangers actually signed Stamkos?

How crazy would it be if the Rangers actually signed Stamkos?
- rangerdanger94

I'd poop my pants

How crazy would it be if the Rangers actually signed Stamkos?
- rangerdanger94

He's going to TML....maybe at the end of that contract... maybe in 6-7 when he is a has been and is close to retirement...

How crazy would it be if the Rangers actually signed Stamkos?
- rangerdanger94

Will have to deal Nash, Staal, Girardi, and Lundqvist. Would have to trade some to the Lightning for Bishop.

Not sure I want another $7M+ deal on the team. Stammer would be $10M easily.

I'd poop my pants


- jimbro83

It's sad that I know where this gif comes from.

He's going to TML....maybe at the end of that contract... maybe in 6-7 when he is a has been and is close to retirement...
- nyrsucks

I want to void my bowels all over your teeth

It's sad that I know where this gif comes from.
- MidnightMarauder

like I said, married for 12 years

How crazy would it be if the Rangers actually signed Stamkos?
- rangerdanger94

So crazy that it's not going to happen. Three logical and legitmate destinations for him and the Rangers are not involved in that discussion.

Will have to deal Nash, Staal, Girardi, and Lundqvist. Would have to trade some to the Lightning for Bishop.

Not sure I want another $7M+ deal on the team. Stammer would be $10M easily.
- mames11

they could make Stamkos happen if they traded Nash and bought out Girardi.

but, that's very unlikely obviously

like I said, married for 12 years
- jimbro83

I can't even blame this on my wife. Only been with her for a little more than five years.

they could make Stamkos happen if they traded Nash and bought out Girardi.

but, that's very unlikely obviously
- jimbro83

A Nash trade I can see but not much else as far as big salaries moved, unfortunately.

Hank is staying put, Girardi likely here for at least one more year, etc. I could maybe see Marc Staal dealt but I don't think they would get away with that without acquiring some salary back.

I want to void my bowels all over your teeth


- eichiefs9

Great to see you are still spending hours and hours of your worthless days on this blog... teehee... enjoy your weekend...

A Nash trade I can see but not much else as far as big salaries moved, unfortunately.

Hank is staying put, Girardi likely here for at least one more year, etc. I could maybe see Marc Staal dealt but I don't think they would get away with that without acquiring some salary back.
- MidnightMarauder

Same with the Nash deal. If we took say a $4M player in return, Gorton would have to find a home for that player and get picks back in order to fully shed that $7M cap hit. I doubt picks and AHLers will be the return on Nash.

The whole thing just sucks. We gave up Dubinsky and Artem for this guy and now we just want to ship the guy away. Sucks.

Same with the Nash deal. If we took say a $4M player in return, Gorton would have to find a home for that player and get picks back in order to fully shed that $7M cap hit. I doubt picks and AHLers will be the return on Nash.

The whole thing just sucks. We gave up Dubinsky and Artem for this guy and now we just want to ship the guy away. Sucks.
- mames11

I think this offseason is a win/win with Nash. Either we trade him and get some new pieces in return, or he stays and has a good season next year.

I really think he's going to have a good season next year whatever team its for

Same with the Nash deal. If we took say a $4M player in return, Gorton would have to find a home for that player and get picks back in order to fully shed that $7M cap hit. I doubt picks and AHLers will be the return on Nash.

The whole thing just sucks. We gave up Dubinsky and Artem for this guy and now we just want to ship the guy away. Sucks.
- mames11

Anisimov and Dubinsky are role players though; the team has plenty of those. The Rangers still lack that go to guy on offense. Every cup contending team has at least one if not more.

Rangers have a lot of 1A type forwards but no clear cut #1. Nash should be, based on physical ability alone, but his lack of killer instinct is a huge detriment to his overall game.

I think this offseason is a win/win with Nash. Either we trade him and get some new pieces in return, or he stays and has a good season next year.

I really think he's going to have a good season next year whatever team its for
- rangerdanger94

You crack me up, dude....

I think this offseason is a win/win with Nash. Either we trade him and get some new pieces in return, or he stays and has a good season next year.

I really think he's going to have a good season next year whatever team its for
- rangerdanger94

Agreed, hope it's somehwere else though.

Two more years on his current deal and his yo-yo production lately, along with his age and injury history, suggest his level of consistency will not hold up.

Anisimov and Dubinsky are role players though; the team has plenty of those. The Rangers still lack that go to guy on offense. Every cup contending team has at least one if not more.

Rangers have a lot of 1A type forwards but no clear cut #1. Nash should be, based on physical ability alone, but his lack of killer instinct is a huge detriment to his overall game.
- MidnightMarauder

Nash, Brassard, Zuccarello, and Stepan are the only 1A forwards the Rangers have.

Kreider doesn't have the consistency that they do to be considered a 1A forward.

At the end of the day though, I think the defense last year was the ultimate reason the Rangers were so bad.

Nash, Brassard, Zuccarello, and Stepan are the only 1A forwards the Rangers have.

Kreider doesn't have the consistency that they do to be considered a 1A forward.

At the end of the day though, I think the defense last year was the ultimate reason the Rangers were so bad.
- rangerdanger94

Four out of twelve would be considered a lot.

If Miller exceeds last year's production, I think you can considered him a legitimate top six type forward.

Defense is definitely what did this team in last season. TAo go from a perennial top five defensive team to 17th overall is quite a horrible descent.

You crack me up, dude....
- nyrsucks