Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: Leafs Have No Reason To Regret Kessel Deal
Author Message
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: The centre of the hockey universe
Joined: 07.31.2006

May 12 @ 12:43 PM ET
What? Horton's contract does not count against the cap... He's LTIR. So how would this hamper the leafs in any way?
- Dozzer

I seem to recall someone suggesting that it can play havoc with your cap in the summer - something about you can't have a guy on LTIR during the summer. So although you can exceed cap by 10%, it still may be a factor.

Note: I don't know if this is true or not - just passing it along.
Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

May 12 @ 12:44 PM ET
1.2 Million is 1.2 million add on the Gleason and Gunnerson contracts and we are sitting at like 3.3 million in wasted cap space. The fact that they could move Clarkson and Dion without retaining and not Kessel is mind boggling
- orienbrady22


Except Gunnarson's hit comes off the books after this season.

Gleason's buyout ends 2 seasons from now... Right when the first batch of young guys are coming off their ELCs

Wow... It's almost like they planned it or something.
orienbrady22
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Windsor, ON
Joined: 02.14.2013

May 12 @ 12:44 PM ET
Different circumstances.
- BetterCallSaul



It is what it is. I'm pretty sure the general consensus when the trade came out was that we didn't get enough but at least Kessel was gone and that was the main thing which i agree with.
Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

May 12 @ 12:45 PM ET
I seem to recall someone suggesting that it can play havoc with your cap in the summer - something about you can't have a guy on LTIR during the summer. So although you can exceed cap by 10%, it still may be a factor.

Note: I don't know if this is true or not - just passing it along.

- Atomic Wedgie


I don't know either... But on the same token teams don't have to be cap compliant until pretty much right before the season starts no?
LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

May 12 @ 12:45 PM ET
I seem to recall someone suggesting that it can play havoc with your cap in the summer - something about you can't have a guy on LTIR during the summer. So although you can exceed cap by 10%, it still may be a factor.

Note: I don't know if this is true or not - just passing it along.

- Atomic Wedgie

Wasn't it you Wedgie that said the Leafs will never have a cap problem when it comes to signing players?

LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

May 12 @ 12:46 PM ET
I normally don't put too much stock into crap like this.

Except...

I attended a coaches' clinic put on by the Leafs in around October of last year.

At the end of it, Shanny was taking questions from the audience.

One guy stood up and said that he wasn't supposed to be the coach of his kid's team that year, but the coach's son got called up a level, so he sort of inherited the team.

Dude went on to say that there was a lot of things ingrained in the culture of the team that he didn't like, and wanted to change, but he was worried about being the guy who came in and disrupted what a lot of other families had built. So he asked Shanny if he had any advice, since he was trying to effect culture change.

Shanny paused, looked at the guy and said, "I don't know what the rules of your league are, but can you trade anyone to Pittsburgh?"

I poop you not.

And then Shanny smiled and said something like, "that's going to get me in trouble."

So you know I thought that Kessel took unfair criticism here. You know my feelings on a) Leafs Nation hating our best players and b) Canadians hating wingers.

But yeah, sometimes where there's smoke there's fire. And Shanny was sure sending out smoke signals that day.

- Atomic Wedgie

Did you read the article I linked to about Kessel?
Steven_Seagull
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mitch Marner sucks
Joined: 03.03.2016

May 12 @ 12:47 PM ET
Cup contending teams typically overspend the cap, not underspend – cap circumventing contracts, leverage other teams salary caps (salary rentention, trade deadline acquisitions), ltir guys until the playoffs etc.

The differences between teams at the top are so minimal. To put your team over the top, you need every dollar working for you and then some.

So yes, to me, $1.2M is a big deal.

- Tumbleweed



The Leafs will not be in any cap problems for a minimal of 6-7 years. Nylander, Marner, Matthews will all be RFAs until then. Just like I said to the other guy, stop overreacting.
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news
Joined: 03.14.2014

May 12 @ 12:47 PM ET
What? Horton's contract does not count against the cap... He's LTIR. So how would this hamper the leafs in any way?
- Dozzer


LTIR allows you to overspend the cap … problem is LTIR space is not bankable during the year, but actual cap space is.

At the TDL, teams typically have space to add players that they wouldn’t be able to at the beginning of the year. The leafs won’t be in that situation if they are using Horton’s LTIR space.
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news
Joined: 03.14.2014

May 12 @ 12:48 PM ET
The Leafs will not be in any cap problems for a minimal of 6-7 years. Nylander, Marner, Matthews will all be RFAs until then. Just like I said to the other guy, stop overreacting.
- Steven_Seagull


we'll be adding UFA's or players by trade.

Leafs will be a cap team well before 6-7 years.
Canada Cup
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Not here to sell jerseys , ON
Joined: 07.06.2007

May 12 @ 12:48 PM ET
So Corey Pronman is now putting Laine ahead of Matthews. Garth alert. Garth alert. Garth alert.
Steven_Seagull
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mitch Marner sucks
Joined: 03.03.2016

May 12 @ 12:50 PM ET
we'll be adding UFA's or players by trade.

Leafs will be a cap team well before 6-7 years.

- Tumbleweed



And what will the salary cap be by then? 88? 90? 1.2 is nothing.
RickJames77
Boston Bruins
Location: We’re Too Old, Boston
Joined: 04.03.2013

May 12 @ 12:50 PM ET
LTIR allows you to overspend the cap … problem is LTIR space is not bankable during the year, but actual cap space is.

At the TDL, teams typically have space to add players that they wouldn’t be able to at the beginning of the year. The leafs won’t be in that situation if they are using Horton’s LTIR space.

- Tumbleweed

Can you give an example? I'm not following...even a hypothetical example.

I don't remember any issues when we had Savard on LTIR, whether when it was signing UFAs or at the trade deadline.
LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

May 12 @ 12:50 PM ET
So Corey Pronman is now putting Laine ahead of Matthews. Garth alert. Garth alert. Garth alert.
- Canada Cup

With them being pretty close, I can't see the Leafs passing on the centre, they need them so badly.
Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

May 12 @ 12:51 PM ET
LTIR allows you to overspend the cap … problem is LTIR space is not bankable during the year, but actual cap space is.

At the TDL, teams typically have space to add players that they wouldn’t be able to at the beginning of the year. The leafs won’t be in that situation if they are using Horton’s LTIR space.

- Tumbleweed


Ok I might be misunderstanding this but a team can apply the LTIR space as soon as they get close to the cap ceiling... At any point of the year except the summer?

I won't deny that I might have this wrong.
orienbrady22
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Windsor, ON
Joined: 02.14.2013

May 12 @ 12:52 PM ET
The Leafs will not be in any cap problems for a minimal of 6-7 years. Nylander, Marner, Matthews will all be RFAs until then. Just like I said to the other guy, stop overreacting.
- Steven_Seagull




They might be pushing the cap trying to win a cup in 5-6 years and that 1.2 Mill could be the difference in gaining that final big piece. Plain and simple it hurts the team for 6 years and yes it does matter.
orienbrady22
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Windsor, ON
Joined: 02.14.2013

May 12 @ 12:53 PM ET
And what will the salary cap be by then? 88? 90? 1.2 is nothing.
- Steven_Seagull



If the cap does go up players will make more. The cap going up doesn't stop the Leafs from spending to it.
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news
Joined: 03.14.2014

May 12 @ 12:53 PM ET
Can you give an example? I'm not following...even a hypothetical example.

I don't remember any issues when we had Savard on LTIR, whether when it was signing UFAs or at the trade deadline.

- RickJames77



These guys exlain well.

http://www.broadstreethoc...jured-reserve-is-not-good

RickJames77
Boston Bruins
Location: We’re Too Old, Boston
Joined: 04.03.2013

May 12 @ 12:53 PM ET
Ok I might be misunderstanding this but a team can apply the LTIR space as soon as they get close to the cap ceiling... At any point of the year except the summer?

I won't deny that I might have this wrong.

- Dozzer

I'm a little confused now too


yayayaya I know , "That's not hard to do to you RJ"
senstroll
Location: Leafs AAV Champs, ON
Joined: 02.22.2008

May 12 @ 12:53 PM ET
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/phil-kessel-called-out-by-leafs-coach-for-rejecting-gameplan-130649936.html
- LeafMan


oh right that stuff from Feschuk ...
Steven_Seagull
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mitch Marner sucks
Joined: 03.03.2016

May 12 @ 12:54 PM ET
They might be pushing the cap trying to win a cup in 5-6 years and that 1.2 Mill could be the difference in gaining that final big piece. Plain and simple it hurts the team for 6 years and yes it does matter.
- orienbrady22



Nope.
RickJames77
Boston Bruins
Location: We’re Too Old, Boston
Joined: 04.03.2013

May 12 @ 12:55 PM ET
These guys exlain well.

http://www.broadstreethoc...jured-reserve-is-not-good

- Tumbleweed

To be honest, this was what I thought you meant, but wasn't sure.
LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

May 12 @ 12:55 PM ET
oh right that stuff from Feschuk ...
- senstroll

Spott confirmed he had asked Kessel to change his defensive breakouts, this actually happened.
MaximusAurelius
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: #FireDubas
Joined: 04.23.2012

May 12 @ 12:56 PM ET
LTIR allows you to overspend the cap … problem is LTIR space is not bankable during the year, but actual cap space is.

At the TDL, teams typically have space to add players that they wouldn’t be able to at the beginning of the year. The leafs won’t be in that situation if they are using Horton’s LTIR space.

- Tumbleweed


so you're saying we should've kept Clarkson bc of the fact it would create extra capspace during season (as opposed to whole season)...?
very logical...
Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

May 12 @ 12:56 PM ET
With them being pretty close, I can't see the Leafs passing on the centre, they need them so badly.
- LeafMan


Agreed. Also, the only reason I bet this happening is due to production at the worlds.

Where Laine actually gets to play with quality linemates and Matthews gets at best fringe NHLers
burn
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON
Joined: 08.02.2006

May 12 @ 12:57 PM ET
LTIR allows you to overspend the cap … problem is LTIR space is not bankable during the year, but actual cap space is.

At the TDL, teams typically have space to add players that they wouldn’t be able to at the beginning of the year. The leafs won’t be in that situation if they are using Horton’s LTIR space.

- Tumbleweed



If the time comes when the leafs need to add a player at the deadline, they put Horton on ltir and have 5mil in cap space.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50  Next