Have you ever seen "The Other Guys"?

Alright boys, shake your Richards, this pissing contest is over.
- BetterCallSaul

Yup. Lol. Best part when the rock and Samuel Jackson are on the roof and see a tiny shrub and say ' you thinking what I'm thinking' and then jump

I still like the Las Vegas Aces, but we can't talk about this right now. It's hockey related.
- BetterCallSaul

I could have sworn one of them said 'I'm done,' about an hour ago.

It's so sad when someone has to LIE instead of admitting they're wrong.

This is my last post to your stupid posts. If you don't have the brain to understand this, you have no hope. You think science from 2005 is just gone. You have no clue what you are talking about.

I still cannot believe you said 2005. Like that matters. The evidence matters that's it. The scientific paper (which there's more of Clearly says that Chromosome 23 and 20 are highly linked to male pattern baldness and a newer one says 7 is linked as well).

Why don't YOU do research. You clearly have no clue what you are talking.

GIVE ME ONE STUDY! JUST ONE. That says 23 is not linked and refutes that article.

Oh wait you can't you just talk out of your ass.

http://onlinelibrary.wile...userIsAuthenticated=false

Here's another quote from the above link "Male-pattern baldness (androgenetic alopecia, AGA) is the most common form of hair loss among humans. Research has shown that it is caused by genetic factors. Numerous studies have unequivocally identified two major genetic risk loci for AGA: the X-chromosomal AR/EDA2R locus, and the PAX1/FOXA2 locus on chromosome 20."


This is my last post to your stupid posts. If you don't have the brain to understand this, you have no hope. You think science from 2005 is just gone. You have no clue what you are talking about.

I still cannot believe you said 2005. Like that matters. The evidence matters that's it. The scientific paper (which there's more of Clearly says that Chromosome 23 and 20 are highly linked to male pattern baldness and a newer one says 7 is linked as well).

Why don't YOU do research. You clearly have no clue what you are talking.

You can't even give me one article that says 23 is not linked and refutes that article.

Oh wait you can't you just talk out of your ass.

http://onlinelibrary.wile...userIsAuthenticated=false

Here's another quote from the above link "Male-pattern baldness (androgenetic alopecia, AGA) is the most common form of hair loss among humans. Research has shown that it is caused by genetic factors. Numerous studies have unequivocally identified two major genetic risk loci for AGA: the X-chromosomal AR/EDA2R locus, and the PAX1/FOXA2 locus on chromosome 20."


This is the ONLY post I edited and did it before your reply (you caught it in between). I edited to remove the all caps. That's it the content is the same

WHERE did I say that x chromosome is the ONLY one.
- KesselRules

I never said the bolded... show me where I did.
I never refuted your article... show me where I did.

I refuted your ORIGINAL statement, which you actually went back and edited. You know you edited it dude. You and I both know it.
EDIT: I doubt anyone cares, He may not have edited his original quote. He is still wrong, but I might have wrongly accused him here of something he didn't do.

Show me ONE incorrect statement I have made in this arguement.

On second thought, don't bother, you aren't qualified to make that determination.
and I am not continuing this discussion with someone who would rather lie than man up.

Yup. Lol. Best part when the rock and Samuel Jackson are on the roof and see a tiny shrub and say ' you thinking what I'm thinking' and then jump
- PatC80

Great movie. Underrated.

So hockey is secondary to male-pattern baldness
- PatC80

Only if you're Al Iafrate.

Great movie. Underrated.
- BetterCallSaul

It's so sad when someone has to LIE instead of admitting they're wrong.
- KesselRules

Yes, yes it is.

I can't wait to ask someone to tell us which of our quote was edited, and how



EDIT: I should be care what I wish for... I doubt anyone cares, He may not have edited his original quote. He is still wrong, but I might have wrongly accused him here of something he didn't do.

I never said the bolded... show me where I did.
I never refuted your article... show me where I did.

I refuted your ORIGINAL statement, which you actually went back and edited. You know you edited it dude. You and I both know it.

Show me ONE incorrect statement I have made in this arguement.

On second thought, don't bother, you aren't qualified to make that determination.
and I am not continuing this discussion with someone who would rather lie than man up.
- Aetherial

WHAT STATEMENT! SHOW ME. SHOW ME THEM. If it's not that. You are a liar.

How about male pattern baldness in not x linked.

My gf and I have verbatim this exact same argument all the time.
- Zezel

That must be a horribly boring relationship Zez.

Yes, yes it is.

I can't wait to ask someone to tell us which of our quote was edited, and how


- Aetherial

So I edited your reply too.

You're not even showing the difference.

You have yet to prove one piece of evidence.

NY Post is breaking it...sportsnet article is being edited right now. Don't know where tsn is at on this.....bob hasn't tweeted it.
- mykokes

Seems fishy that comes up out of nowhere......and from the NY Post of all sources.

That must be a horribly boring relationship Zez.
- Phenom

Nah, they are both bald, just not in the same place.

So I edited your reply too.

You're not even showing the difference.

You have yet to prove one piece of evidence.
- KesselRules

Interesting...

You were smart enough to change it back again, but not smart enough to change your follow up statement.

Page 25:

I was talking in context of the x chromosome when I said only. I CLEARLY SAID PROBABLY IN THE BEGINNING
- KesselRules

.

Page 9:

He probably won't. Baldness is on the X chromosome and he can only get it from his mother as his dad gave him the Y.
- KesselRules

(changed back to the original again, LOL!)

Oh yeah, you said "probably" and followed it up with something factually incorrect.


EDIT: I doubt anyone cares, He may not have edited his original quote. He is still wrong, but I might have wrongly accused him here of something he didn't do.

Nah, they are both bald, just not in the same place.
- sloppyseconds2

- Phenom

I actually am bald, mostly. It's on both sides of my family though, all the way through, so I had no genetic hope in hell

Nah, they are both bald, just not in the same place.
- sloppyseconds2

she shaves her back

(frank) Will Ferrell.

I actually am bald, mostly. It's on both sides of my family though, all the way through, so I had no genetic hope in hell
- Aetherial

the healing has begun

Lebrun tweeted Daly quoted as saying the report is the most ridiculous and irresponsible story he's ever been associated with.


And that's saying something coming from him.

(frank) Will Ferrell.
- Tee-Dot

I hope he's in the next poopty star wars movie

I actually am bald, mostly. It's on both sides of my family though, all the way through, so I had no genetic hope in hell
- Aetherial

We know. Remember that drunken night where a whole bunch of us showed pics of ourselves on here?

Tool looks like Bobby Lou.

Don't know if this is late or not... but Richards was questioned about Oxycodone at the border?

If that is the problem, I can't see how the Kings can simply terminate. Doesn't the CBA prescribe a course of action here?

We know. Remember that drunken night where a whole bunch of us showed pics of ourselves on here?

Tool looks like Bobby Lou.
- Tee-Dot

I can't help but picture Tool looking like Al Bundy, I imagine people who were not on the thread that night think I look like Nigel Tufnel.

Interesting...

You were smart enough to change it back again, but not smart enough to change your follow up statement.

Page 25:
.

Page 9:

(changed back to the original again, LOL!)

Oh yeah, you said "probably" and followed it up with something factually incorrect.
- Aetherial

Thank you. This all started because I said Nylander probably won't get it due to the x chromosome and said the only is in context of the x.

You then went on a tirade that I changed it. When right after I posted a screen shot of EXACTLY your reply right here.

Thank you. You just proved you're either an idiot or a liar.


If you read the context of the message it was a reply to Nylander's dad being bald so he'll be bald. I said the most likely was his dad had it on the X and his mother won't pass it on.


BUT THANK YOU. EVERYONE CAN SEE NOW I DIDN'T CHANGE IT AND YOU ARE A LIAR OR A BUFFOON.