- PoketheBear

I like the part where Bruins gagged the lead away. Good times.

Someone needs someone from up above to try and talk sense into Claude's head. Bullpoop call but there's no way it should've come to that I agree.

Chiarelli should've waived Campbell and Paille months ago.

Resign McQuaid right now for Christ sake.

- PoketheBear

It looks like Perry bumps Rask's shoulder and spins him off balance enabling the goal.

I did watch Kessler, did he ever interfere/lay on his stick/hold his stick with his glove.

Way to blow it stripes.

I like the part where Bruins gagged the lead away. Good times.
- glove_was_stuck

Well I wasn't too sold on it until that view, Kes definitely bumps the shoulder, that's 100% Goalie Interference. Especially how soft this league calls Goalie Interference

Well I wasn't too sold on it until that view, Kes definitely bumps the shoulder, that's 100% Goalie Interference. Especially how soft this league calls Goalie Interference
- MrBeanTown

That was actually Perry bumping Rask. Kesler had a hold of Bergy's stick. You can see him let go of it after they score. What an a$$ Kesler is.

Ty nailed it this is just a microcosm of our season. Between this, the puck in the netting vs Cbj, all the called back goals, the injuries and probably some other abnormal stuff that went against us that I'm forgetting, its been a (frank)ed up season.

- PoketheBear

Clear GI, should be a no-goal. But then again Carey Price can initiate contact with the defender and get a goal waived off so who the (frank) knows anymore. This rule is so poorly written yet it continues to be a problem yet the NHL won't even allow reviews to make sure they get it right

Michael Felger posted on csnne.com........even strength time on ice.

Carl Soderberg: 16:48
Loui Eriksson: 16:38
Patrice Bergeron: 16:35
David Krejci: 16:22
Brad Marchand: 16:06
Reilly Smith: 13:49
Max Talbot: 12:08
Gregory Campbell: 11:52
Chris Kelly: 11:27
Milan Lucic: 8:39
Ryan Spooner: 8:21
David Pastrnak: 8:06

Laid back too much with the lead. In the past we go for "the kill", but we play like the puck is a grenade with this line-up.

The question becomes, do you play the team leading goal scorers in March and try to score to stretch the lead........or do you play the less skilled "vets" and try to cling to the one goal lead.

Wish we would evolve more on this point, but that's just one guys observation.

and do people still want to talk about how much better Bart is playing
- 77emac77

How about we speak about seidenberg being a -8 in the last 4 games. Seriously, the guy has been on the ice for every goal against as of late

How about we speak about seidenberg being a -8 in the last 4 games. Seriously, the guy has been on the ice for every goal against as of late
- TylerSeguin19

That Tampa game was a perfect example as Chara and Seidenberg get split right down the middle and beat for a goal.

Seindenberg was on the ice for a goal against with every defense partner.

But lets point out mistakes for the whipping boy, because he is the biggest problem with this defense. I think it's wishful thinking that if, "we just had an upgrade for Bart everything would be okay."

I cringe a lot more on the constant mistakes our three vets (Mquaid, Chara and Seidenberg) make than the kids.

The rest of them are old and crippled they at least have an excuse Bart SUCKS and always has. The fact that he was even resigned and not sold off for a pittance is ridiculous.

All we can do is hope Morrow is ready, Seids bounces back and we can pick up a decent dman in free agency or by trade.

The rest of them are old and crippled they at least have an excuse Bart SUCKS and always has. The fact that he was even resigned and not sold off for a pittance is ridiculous.

All we can do is hope Morrow is ready, Seids bounces back and we can pick up a decent dman in free agency or by trade.
- PoketheBear

He is the fourth D man.......FOURTH.

Think about it for a second.

If you get a better player than Bart,

Then you are likely getting a better player than the FOURTH D man.

So you are getting a number two or three.

Hence, number two or three D men are obviously not easy to find or we would have one to replace Seidenberg.