Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Eric Engels: CHaracter Defines These Canadiens
Author Message
Yeti1181
Referee
Edmonton Oilers
Location: I'm AWESOME, AB
Joined: 07.27.2012

Oct 22 @ 10:53 AM ET
WINnipeg
- Fredobface

LOSER bay

You lost to the Oilers
number_23
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Euuuuh, un porc-épic?
Joined: 10.15.2008

Oct 22 @ 10:54 AM ET
fredo vs. fido


- dt99999



Looks like they're making love...
DoubleDown
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Not to point any fingers but Tyson Barrie has looked awful in the blue and white for the Leafs., QC
Joined: 07.28.2006

Oct 22 @ 10:54 AM ET
I mentioned in it in the first paragraph.

Of course, the unknown is two-fold:
How will they be at defending a lead?
What do they have to do better to get ahead?

But, it's more hypothetical than real, so we'll wait to see, and address it then.

In the meantime, do you guys watch Sons of Anarchy?

- EricEngels


coming out with more energy would be a start. they did against Colorado but last night was a brutal opening 10 minutes. also not sure if you were at the BC but it seemed like a very subdued crowd.
stinger67
Montreal Canadiens
Location: QC
Joined: 07.03.2008

Oct 22 @ 10:54 AM ET
Eric Engels: CHaracter Defines These Canadiens
- EricEngels


They miss Gionta and Gorges so much.
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens
Location: I'm bi. Why limit yourself with half of the possible delicious pleasures of life - Fredo, ON
Joined: 02.26.2007

Oct 22 @ 10:55 AM ET
They miss Gionta and Gorges so much.
- stinger67

and Parros
Biggus Dickus
Montreal Canadiens
Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
Joined: 02.13.2010

Oct 22 @ 10:55 AM ET
They miss Gionta and Gorges so much.
- stinger67

Pleks really misses Gionta on his wing
dt99999
Montreal Canadiens
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim
Joined: 11.18.2008

Oct 22 @ 10:55 AM ET
Looks like they're making love...
- number_23



just showing good sportsmanship.




by making love.
Habs Talk
Montreal Canadiens
Joined: 10.03.2005

Oct 22 @ 10:55 AM ET
coming out with more energy would be a start. they did against Colorado but last night was a brutal opening 10 minutes. also not sure if you were at the BC but it seemed like a very subdued crowd.
- DoubleDown


they were watching all the offsides, the same way you were. And yeah, when you see quotes in the blog, that's a strong indication I was there, unless they're attributed to someone else who gathered them...
number_23
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Euuuuh, un porc-épic?
Joined: 10.15.2008

Oct 22 @ 10:56 AM ET
Rene Bourque first.

I still think Lars has the speed/size/shot.

In the past everybody said he shoud not play the wing because he sucks there. Well right now he's sucking at center, his very limited playmaking skill is showing off.

He needs to learn to play wing/ cut to the net and a center that can feed him the puck in stride.

- Fredobface


I'm a bit worried about a centre (eller) who doesn't have the wherewithal to play wing... shows his limited hockey smarts and awareness... playing wing is a lot simpler that centre...how come a 18 year old at the time (Galchenyuk) was able to do it, but a guy 5 years older (so theoretically more experience) still struggles with it???

3M
Location: Antigua
Joined: 06.30.2009

Oct 22 @ 10:56 AM ET
[quote=Biggus Richardus]

No, but good try.
Fredobface
Tampa Bay Lightning
Location: Pacioretty is a gamebreaker, you need guys like that -DD, QC
Joined: 12.09.2008

Oct 22 @ 10:57 AM ET
And Bourque doesn't?!?
- fidopro

Dude, Bourque has 38 points and is a -25 in 135 games with the CH.

Give up.
twiztedmike
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.06.2007

Oct 22 @ 10:57 AM ET
I'm a bit worried about a centre (eller) who doesn't have the wherewithal to play wing... shows his limited hockey smarts and awareness... playing wing is a lot simpler that centre...how come a 18 year old at the time (Galchenyuk) was able to do it, but a guy 5 years older (so theoretically more experience) still struggles with it???
- number_23

ALL PLAYERS #81 SUCK!!!!!!
yemrots
Location: Leafs need a backup goalie more than a stud defenceman this year
Joined: 03.04.2008

Oct 22 @ 10:57 AM ET
WINnipeg
- Fredobface

YES!!!!
dt99999
Montreal Canadiens
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim
Joined: 11.18.2008

Oct 22 @ 10:57 AM ET
I'm a bit worried about a centre (eller) who doesn't have the wherewithal to play wing... shows his limited hockey smarts and awareness... playing wing is a lot simpler that centre...how come a 18 year old at the time (Galchenyuk) was able to do it, but a guy 5 years older (so theoretically more experience) still struggles with it???
- number_23

did a stray bullet graze your head or something?
number_23
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Euuuuh, un porc-épic?
Joined: 10.15.2008

Oct 22 @ 10:58 AM ET
did a stray bullet graze your head or something?
- dt99999




non, pourquoi?

You don't agree?
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC
Joined: 08.10.2008

Oct 22 @ 10:58 AM ET
Dude, Bourque has 38 points and is a -25 in 135 games with the CH.

Give up.

- Fredobface


You give up!

They both suck equally. They both have size, speed and shot like you say but Bourque most go and Eller stay???

Come on...
3M
Location: Antigua
Joined: 06.30.2009

Oct 22 @ 10:58 AM ET
You can still make improvement on the team. It's not because they have a good record that they are perfect.

Right now the third line is useless. We are gonna need an third line that provides secondary scoring or can shutdown the opponent in the grind of the season.

- Fredobface


There's no pleasing some people.
Biggus Dickus
Montreal Canadiens
Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
Joined: 02.13.2010

Oct 22 @ 10:59 AM ET
No, but good try.
- 3M

your not ndp are you?

For what it is worth I believe Harper's time is up. I will be voting for Liberals this run
number_23
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Euuuuh, un porc-épic?
Joined: 10.15.2008

Oct 22 @ 10:59 AM ET
You give up!

They both suck equally. They both have size, speed and shot like you say but Bourque most go and Eller stay???

Come on...

- fidopro



We have to prioritize...Bourque first, Eller second. You now.

yemrots
Location: Leafs need a backup goalie more than a stud defenceman this year
Joined: 03.04.2008

Oct 22 @ 10:59 AM ET
they were watching all the offsides, the same way you were. And yeah, when you see quotes in the blog, that's a strong indication I was there, unless they're attributed to someone else who gathered them...
- EricEngels

Wohh!!! Don't stress over DoubleDummy over there.
3M
Location: Antigua
Joined: 06.30.2009

Oct 22 @ 10:59 AM ET
Exactly...right now we are cruising with a NOTHING contribution from Bourque/Eller... imagine if we have a positive contribution from Bournival or whoever else...
- number_23


You know their record would be with a contribution from Bourque/Eller? 6-1-0. Rocket Richard himself wouldn't have made a difference against Tampa.

Team has 6 wins; STFU and be happy about it.
number_23
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Euuuuh, un porc-épic?
Joined: 10.15.2008

Oct 22 @ 11:00 AM ET
There's no pleasing some people.
- 3M



Keep your approach to women's sexual needs out of these boards...

dt99999
Montreal Canadiens
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim
Joined: 11.18.2008

Oct 22 @ 11:00 AM ET
Wohh!!! Don't stress over DoubleDummy over there.
- yemrots

yeah, love how we have to look for clues in the blog.


it's like one of those little mystery books where you have to look at a pic in the mirror to get the answer.
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC
Joined: 08.10.2008

Oct 22 @ 11:00 AM ET
We have to prioritize...Bourque first, Eller second. You now.
- number_23


DEAL!
Habs Talk
Montreal Canadiens
Joined: 10.03.2005

Oct 22 @ 11:01 AM ET
Wohh!!! Don't stress over DoubleDummy over there.
- yemrots


there was no malice in that response.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93  Next